Jump to content

With The 11" Coil In Iron You Really Don't Know...


Jackpine

Recommended Posts

I'm on a high recovery rate, it's 6 better to figure out the size of the subject ... like the recovery speed 4 ... here's the signal longer and it's more compact-less readable ... for me, sometimes I switch to 5khz-a more iron signal ... ID is also run-less firmly ... Equinox has a feature with a optic overload indicator in only one program on Beach2 - and there is a TX execution ..- I try to do it in the - user profile program and compare it ..
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Phrunt --

 

Here's one thing that might help a bit... I can say that using pinpoint mode helps quite a bit, at least for me.  Listening closely to the "length" of the pinpoint signal really helps me out with sizing. 

It's ironic; in my opinion you often don't NEED to go to pinpoint mode on the EQX for the specific purpose pinpointing; it is (to me) easy to "pinpoint" targets without using pinpoint mode, as I find the EQX to be so "accurate" so as to render pinpoint mode unnecessary on many targets.  BUT -- USING pinpoint mode offers some other "clues" that I find very helpful, and thus -- I DO use pinpoint mode on many, many targets.  One thing that helps for me, is the modulation of the audio is better in pinpoint mode; thus, it helps me get more information about depth of the target.  And then, there's the sizing advantage I mentioned; for me, pinpoint definitely is another tool to help with "sizing" the target -- which helps to allow me not to dig certain large targets that I'm not interested in.

Steve

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, phrunt said:

My biggest issue is not knowing how big an object is under the Equinox, I can easily mistake a full drink can for a small coin, target ID's the same (21-22 for cans, same for our gold coins), signal feels the same, I have no idea how to tell the difference.... with my T2 I could easily tell how big something is, and if it was huge like a coke can I would get a coil overload so I knew not to bother, it's not the coin I was hoping for, it's huge.

I try lifting the coil up higher above the ground in the air to check if its a can but a shallow coin can give me the same sort of air level as a can deeper does, so that doesn't really work....

Am I doing something wrong, is there a way I can work out what's a can and what's a coin?  I haven't found the depth meter all that reliable sorting this out and I've dug 6 cans now... what on earth full cans are doing underground I don't know and they're almost always beer cans ? ....

The only thing that is possibly setting them apart from coins is the sound is sometimes choppy, not sharp like a coin, but then I worry its a coin on edge or deeper where harder to get a good signal or surrounded by iron or something...... 

 

2 minutes ago, steveg said:

Phrunt --

 

Here's one thing that might help a bit... I can say that using pinpoint ode helps a ton, at least for me.  Listening closely to the "length" of the pinpoint signal really helps, for me.  It's ironic; in my opinion you don't NEED to go to pinpoint mode, with the EQX for the specific purpose pinpointing; it is (to me) easy to "pinpoint" targets without using pinpoint mode, as I find the EQX to be so "accurate" so as to render pinpoint mode unnecessary on many targets.  BUT -- USING pinpoint mode offers some other "clues" that I find very helpful, and thus -- I DO use pinpoint mode on many, many targets.  One thing that helps for me, is the modulation of the audio is better in pinpoint mode; thus, it helps me get more information about depth of the target.  And then, there's the sizing advantage I mentioned; for me, pinpoint definitely is another tool to help with "sizing" the target -- which helps to allow me not to dig certain large targets that I'm not interested in.

Steve

Agree with Steve's recommendation, pinpoint mode gives away large shallow objects big time.  Pinpoint coil sweep and audio modulation easily tell me I am swinging over a shallow can vs. a coin.  I have even used Gold mode at sites littered with big iron because the VCO pitch-like audio behaves in a similar fashion (though pinpoint is a non-motion mode so it is easier to "trace" a large target outline, than gold mode, which gives a cruder representation of the size of the target).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seldom if ever use PP to size a target.  In fact I mostly try it just to see if it will PP the desired target rather than near by iron and it does a good job picking those out.  Once in a while I will interrogate a really iffy signal using PP to see if it's false signal off the edge of iron but that's only on the head scratchers where rotating leaves some doubt and I usually dig it anyway.  

Not may deep cans around here so lifting the coil works for me most of the time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At first I was using the PP a quite bit to size objects, actually I still do. I like to hear that quick little response to know it's a coin size object.

One thing I've learned from watching a video that another member posted here, is to watch those coins on edge. They will pinpoint wide one way off the side of the coil. Kinda sounds like one big object but if you listen closely its like a double beep that blends together, those are coins straight up and down. 

I guess a straight up and down coin exposes the most surface area to the coil when its off to the side.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Alluminati said:

At first I was using the PP a quite bit to size objects, actually I still do. I like to hear that quick little response to know it's a coin size object.

One thing I've learned from watching a video that another member posted here, is to watch those coins on edge. They will pinpoint wide one way off the side of the coil. Kinda sounds like one big object but if you listen closely its like a double beep that blends together, those are coins straight up and down. 

I guess a straight up and down coin exposes the most surface area to the coil when its off to the side.

This I think I've heard quite a bit in soft dry beach sand.  However in that type of sand I will never really know if the coin was actually standing on edge down below once I've scooped it.   But knowing this happens now will help demystify why some might sound off this way and maybe why sometimes the side of the coil seems to initially find it.  Thank you for explaining this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, TennesseeDigger said:

This is great news! I like the Equinox a lot, and I have found old deep square nailes, while giving off a high tone, are bouncy and not consistent in signal relay.

what is the 6”  coil MSRP?

$179

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By ColonelDan
      I've read several threads on the soon-to-be-fielded Deus 2 and how it will compare to the Equinox. There have been many good views on this topic so I thought I'd share mine. As you read this, keep in mind the views expressed here are worth just as much as you've paid for them. 😁

      1. Wireless vs Wired: I'm 99% a salt water beach hunter with my EQX 800 and the way I grid a beach, I often go from the damp sand to the wet sand and then into the surf (only about 1 foot deep due to concerns over water intrusion so I keep the control box dry). Given that, a Deus II for me would have to be constantly wired from coil to control box in order to work in the surf. For that reason, a totally wireless capability would not be that enticing since the wire from coil to box would be a permanent configuration.

      2. Waterproof: I owned a Deus and found it to be a solidly engineered machine so I'm not a skeptic where XP claims of being waterproof are concerned. Were I to make a wager, I'd bet on much better waterproof performance in the Deus II than was the original ML waterproof claim for the EQX. Being truly waterproof is important for me and not because I hunt deeper than 1 foot in salt water these days because I don't. Ours is an outdoor hobby so I think all detectors should be waterproof...at the very least, reliably weatherproof. How many times have you been caught in the rain or dropped your detector in a puddle of water? Even if you are a land hunter and never go near any water, replacing a damaged or inop machine due to moisture intrusion isn't a trivial thing.

      3. Build quality: The Deus I had was quality built, rugged and reliable. No coil ear issues, wobbly shafts or arm cuff breakage. In my view, it was a much more rugged detector than Minelab products in certain areas. XP doesn't seem to pinch pennies as did Minelab on simple things. Recall the original skimpy gaskets they put in the CTX 3030 that caused flooding of the battery box. The issue was solved when they came out with merely a little thicker gasket! Their use of cheap coil ears, arm cuffs and wobbly shafts on the EQX series is another example. For a few pennies more per unit, they would have saved untold thousands in warranty replacement costs in both the CTX and EQX series machines. Although they are among the very best where software technology is concerned, I never understood that "penny wise pound foolish" approach in their physical build design.

      4. Overall Performance: This is where the EQX was superior to my original Deus. The multi-frequency/multi IQ of the EQX vs the selectable single frequency of the Deus was an obvious choice in my salt water beach hunting environment. I eventually sold my Deus for that reason. Now, if XP has really overcome that limitation in the Deus II with their FMF feature, I'll be happily impressed.

      5. Final Thoughts: I'm with the others who will take a "wait and see" approach. But, given my past experience with XP engineering, I have no doubt the Deus II will be a very capable salt water beach detector. Will it generally outperform the Minelabs? TBD. Will it be found that XP pinched pennies on their build quality? I say no. It will be a well built unit. Will it be more comfortable to use than the Minelabs? Yes. Will it be more complex in its settings options than the Minelabs? Yes. Will it's overall performance justify the higher price tag compared to the current EQX? TBD but that will be determined solely by and in the eye of the beholder as the saying goes.

      Just a few thoughts from my foxhole...  
    • By UT Dave
      I'd like to increase my knowledge and skill in tuning my Nox 800 for specific conditions.
      Those of you who tune your machines off the factory defaults, please share what you have!  Not what your settings are, but how you arrive at those settings.
      For instance, is there a relationship between different settings, such, that a preferred order of operations is suggested for optimal results?  I noise cancel, then ground grab, then adjust sensitivity.  FE2, Recovery, Threshold, is there a best practice for the order in which they are set?
      How do you know when you should increase or decrease FE2 or Recovery?  What factors or indicators go into that decision?
      I've arrived at my current default beginning state, by trying to make things first "worse" in my test garden.  By adjusting each setting individually up and down though the full range of adjustment, noting whether signal got better or worse at each step, to get what I considered the best signal on a deep silver coin.  But doing so in a controlled situation with a known target like that is one thing, knowing how to read variable conditions and how to tune accordingly is quite another.
      How do you make your tuning decisions in the field?  What are the settings you most frequently find need adjusted to accommodate search conditions?
      - Dave
    • By Veisal
      Here are some improvements to the ergonomics of the minelab equinox 600/800 made with a 3D printer 
       
       






    • By Momokahn
      Just like the college sports transfer portal, I too have decided to change my mind.😁  I was set on buying the new NM Legend.  Instead I visited a local MD dealer today and had a chance to test drive the dealers Equinox 800. The Equinox 800 checked every box and then some.  It will get me where I want to be in metal detecting.  The dealer was pretty impressed on how I was able to navigate through the controllers menus and settings. It is on order and will be here next week.  Now for the "goodies" getting thrown in for free.  Both editions of Andy Sabisch's Handbooks on the Equinox 600/800, a Minelab Hat (I love hats), and any magazine, current or past editions that are in stock.  And there are a lot in stock.  Excited is an understatement.
    • By Dan(NM)
      I had a very productive day hunting a city park in a nearby town. Took me 7 1/2 hours to round up all these keepers. The v nickel is the fifth one I've taken out of this park in the last 2 weeks. Ended up with a nickel trifecta to boot.  I think I'm going to get the 5x10 coil due to the amount of iron and debris in the places that are producing the coins. I did pretty good by going nice and slow and digging all iffy tones. I was very surprised to see the Canadian quarter come out, that's the second one I've found this year.
      Nox 800
      Park 1
      Recovery 3
      Iron Bias 0
      Sens 23
      Manual GB 30
      2 Tones
      Tone break at 10
      No Disc-wide open


    • By Dan(NM)
      I went back to a park that's been producing some good finds. Today was a very unusual nickel day. Ended up with 3 silver war nickels, a v nickel, an unidentified coin, 4 Wheaties and a religious medallion. I didn't really have a goal this year for silver coins but with today's finds that puts me at 112 for the year. Running park 1...2 tones..no disc...manual gb at 30..recovery speed 3..iron bias at F2-0.. tone break at 10...sens 23.  All war nickels hit at 15, the V hit 12-13, the unidentified coin(?) hits at 12.

×
×
  • Create New...