Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
phrunt

100 Khz Detectors Even Better?

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Buzzard said:

If I remember right the Gold Bug 2 is 71khz and that is the highest of any detectors that I know of.

There have been higher, like the Compass Yukon at 100Khz.

https://www.kellycodetectors.com/catalog/demo-yukon-99b

Compass Yukon-B discovers gold, silver, copper, coins-on land, under dirt, snow, rocks, cement, in shallow water. Yukon-B is a T-R balance circuit incorporating both transistors and integrated circuits. Operating at 100kHz-modulated with 250Hz .Batteries commonly available 9v and 1.5 V penlight. 40-50 hours on 9v, 50-60 hours on 1.5v. Coil is waterproof high impact ABS plastic. White for heat reflection. Audio is distinctive tonal quality for optimum ear pick-up Uncomplicated and easy to set up and tune with only 3 knobs; power on/off volume, metal and/or mineral tuning, and indicating light on/off.

s-l1600.jpg

I wish I had one of these! So cool, so very cool! 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Simon,

The big difference is these early 100 kHz T/R models are "BGB" or "Before Ground Balancing" and they put out nowhere near the power of modern detectors. They had to be operated at a specific height over the ground, and any variation either caused a false signal, or detuned the detector. They were extremely difficult to run in mineralized ground due to this. Depth on coin type targets is just a few inches. Sensitivity to small gold was non-existent. They were also prone to tuning drift and so required constant threshold updating.

The old T/R (Transmitter/Receiver) models did have the ability to largely ignore nails since nails were treated the same as ground. There are some cult owners that have them due to this. I had a Compass Yukon up until a few years ago, but that ability is overrated and no match for modern trash sifters like the Deus. Long story short interesting stuff but dinosaurs by today's standards.

My first detector, the White's Coinmaster IV was similar but Compass was generally acknowledged as having taken that particular old tech as far as it could go.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So my big question is that people love the GB2 and it's 71khz frequency. Competitors of it haven't gone near the 71khz mark, staying below it by a reasonable margin, is there a reason for this happening and them at least not matching it? 

Frequency seems a good marketing tool more than anything in these higher frequencies so why hasn't Fisher come out with a Gold Bug 3 with 100khz to make a bold statement?

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a diminishing point of returns above 40 kHz. 100 kHz would basically add instability and get even less depth than a Gold Bug 2 (not a depth demon) while only enhancing the ability to detect bits so tiny you need a microscope to see them. Minelab went with 45 kHz for this very reason. Target id spread also continues to compress the higher you go, making ferrous/non-ferrous discrimination more challenging.

If you have the hankering get the Deus HF elliptical coil, tops out at 81 kHz. Which kind of blows a hole in the original premise of the post - the Gold Bug 2 is not the highest frequency nugget machine available. Yet I would put the Gold Bug 2 up against the Deus HF because the Bug sports a 6" elliptical concentric coil that is half the magic. Frequency is not everything. Transmit power, coil type, and above all the efficiency of the ground balance circuit and more all have a role to play.

Buying a detector based solely on operating kHz makes as much sense these days as buying a computer based solely on processor speed. Even less sense when you consider what is going on with multifrequency.

As always just my not so humble opinions....

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Macro Gold Racer at 56 kHz is a nice running detector.. Great for gold but I actually did very well Coin hunting with it too.

Bryan

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When it comes to the tradeoffs in frequency vs size/depth for gold machines, that is an area where it seems like a multi-frequency gold machine (like the Nox but maybe with the frequencies shifted a bit higher to catch the really small stuff) should shine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you master the Equinox with 6” coil it will outperform most if not all single frequency units. There is no need to “shift” anything higher - it already does the job on the really small stuff. The cumulative effect of several frequencies working in tandem does appear to exceed the punch that can be delivered by any one single frequency. People scoff at the “obsolete” statement made by Minelab but I don’t see any point in going back to single frequency myself. That’s just me however - your mileage may vary. The main problem with the Equinox is that it is a heavier lift to master the machine than the single frequency units due to the complex interplay between the various settings. A future dedicated nugget detector based on Multi-IQ will no doubt be simpler to operate and feature stock coils made specifically for nugget detecting.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

If you master the Equinox with 6” coil it will outperform most if not all single frequency units. There is no need to “shift” anything higher - it already does the job on the really small stuff. The cumulative effect of several frequencies working in tandem does appear to exceed the punch that can be delivered by any one single frequency. People scoff at the “obsolete” statement made by Minelab but I don’t see any point in going back to single frequency myself. That’s just me however - your mileage may vary. The main problem with the Equinox is that it is a heavier lift to master the machine than the single frequency units due to the complex interplay between the various settings. A future dedicated nugget detector based on Multi-IQ will no doubt be simpler to operate and feature stock coils made specifically for nugget detecting.

Good to hear, since I already have the Nox 600 and also the 6" coil. (I'm thinking seriously about adding the 800, which would also give me the gold modes, although I understand Park 2 and Field 2 do a reasonable job on gold.) With effective nugget hunting added to its resume, the Equinox certainly does come closer to doing everything than any other VLF machine. I do wonder, though, whether the tracking systems of some of the dedicated gold machines might give them an edge, at least in convenience.  For example, the Gold Monster 1000's success is apparently due in part to its aggressive (and effective) tracking system.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have a Gold Monster, Gold Kruzer, and Goldmaster 24K on hand. There is something nice about that old fashioned all metal mode I will always like. They are all capable units so it really depends on just what you desire in a detector. I can be successful with any of them and what works best in one location may not have "an edge" at another location. All ground and all gold is not the same, so in general I find pursuing such microscopic edges to be a waste of time. My skill as a prospector vastly outweighs such small differences that exist between most VLF models.

If you seek power, then get a GPZ 7000 and be done with it. Once you use one of those all VLF units pale by comparison and then you would see why I don't worry much about the fine details on what are in reality second tier models anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      High Frequency Gold Nugget Detector Roundup
      Our cup runneth over!
      Just a few years ago the market for "over 30 kHz nugget detectors" was quite limited. For a long time there were only a few options:
      Fisher Gold Bug 2 (71 kHz) $764 with one coil
      Minelab Eureka Gold (6.4, 20, & 60 kHz) Discontinued $1049 when new with one coil
      White's GMZ (50 kHz) Discontinued $499 when new with one coil
      White's GMT (48 khz) $729 with one coil
      Things were that way for over a decade. Then in 2015 Makro introduced the Gold Racer (56 kHz) $599 with one coil. Sister company Nokta released the AU Gold Finder (56 kHz) $799 with two coils
      Then in 2017 we see the Minelab Gold Monster 1000 (45 khz) at $799 with two coils. And although not a dedicated nugget detector, the Deus high frequency coil options (up to 80 kHz) were also released, $1520 for complete detector with one HF coil.
      Now in 2018 we get another general purpose machine, the Equinox 800, that can hit 40 khz, $899 with one coil. And just announced...
      the Makro Gold Kruzer (61 kHz) $749 with two coils and
      the White's Goldmaster 24K (48 khz) $699 with two coils
      These last two announcements have made barely a ripple in the prospecting world, or at least going by other forums that seems to be the case. There are various reason for that (forums not being prospecting oriented or being Minelab centric) but still the lack of buzz is interesting. I do believe people are both burned out by all the new introductions and that the market is saturated with high frequency models. Leaving out the general purpose machines to sum up the current options it looks like the current "sweet spot" for pricing is a high frequency model at $749 with two coils.
      Makro Gold Racer 56 kHz - $599 one coil
      White's Goldmaster 24K 48 kHz - $599 one coil
      White's Goldmaster 24K 48 kHz - $699 two coils
      White's GMT 48 khz - $729 one coil
      Makro Gold Kruzer 61 kHz - $749 two coils
      Fisher Gold Bug 2 71 kHz - $764 one coil
      Minelab Gold Monster 1000 45 kHz - $799 two coils
      Nokta AU Gold Finder 56 kHz - $799 two coils

      High frequency nugget detectors compared

      White's Goldmaster 24K, Minelab Equinox 800, Gold Monster 1000, Makro Gold Kruzer

      Minelab Gold Monster, Fisher Gold Bug 2, Makro Gold Racer, Nokta Impact
    • By green
      I've been trying to make a PI detector as a learning exercise in another forum(Geotech). Asked the question below but haven't got a reply. Maybe someone here could answer the question. 
      Nugget sizing info:
      We are often asked how many pieces per gram or ounce. It is very hard to predict how many pieces there are per gram or ounce as the # of nuggets by weight varies quite a bit per batch. But in general you can expect around 1-2 pieces of gold for 4 mesh, 2-4 pieces of 6 mesh per gram, 7-12 pieces of 8 mesh per gram and around 15-20 per gram for 10 mesh. You can expect many more pieces for smaller 12 (around 20-25), 14-16 (around 30-50 or more) pieces and hundreds for fine gold. Every batch is very different and each piece of gold is natural and of course therefore unique. Some may be flat and light or rounded and very dense (heavy).

      How small a nugget can a good PI detect? What mesh size would make good test targets for smaller nuggets? 8 mesh, 10 mesh, both or other?

      Any guess on typical TC for 8 or 10 mesh nuggets?
    • By Ridge Runner
      I myself like the looks of screen of my MX Sport but not the weight. It would be great for it to trim some fat off of it. Out of all the ID numbers it has to offer I’d like to be able to notch out one at a time. 
      We all know that different frequencies is better than others depending on what you’re detecting. If I can I’d like it to be multi frequency where I can run in all and single one if I do wish.
       What I want is a detector that it will do the major part of my detecting. My thing I’m a coin hunter first be it on a beach are around some old homestead . I’ve never been a relic hunter but it would have to offer the same for that person too .
      I love nugget hunting but it’s just not a lot of gold in Texas but it would be great to have some high frequencies to nugget hunt. I don’t see the need that I should have to buy another detector for what little I do get to nugget hunt.
       We all different and our wants runs different too.I know too it’s other detectors offer the things I’m wanting from White’s right now but I’d like to see America made on the side.
       Chuck 
    • By 1515Art
      Detecting heavy metal.

    • By dsrtdwg1
      Today I tried something different, trying to cherry pick only deep high tones. Had the 6 inch coil on my 800, very trashy small 100+ year old park.
      Set  it on Park 1, noise cancel, manual GB, 5 tones with the first 3 segments set to 0 volume 1 tone the last 2 were both set to max volume and tone,
      set the recovery speed at 5 and 0 iron bias. My question to those that  know is, am I losing depth with this kind of setting? It seemed to work well, I have been 
      trying to figure out  how to park hunt deep silver,.All the pieces in the image were only giving tone, no numbers and were all carrot deep. Suggestions?

    • By Steve Herschbach
      When I saw a video showing the Makro Gold Racer recovery speed using two nails and a gold ring, it caused me to reflect on the various internet nail tests. Nearly all employ modern round nails, when these items rarely present issues.
      The common VDI (visual discrimination scale) puts ferrous items at the low end of the scale, and items with progressively increasing conductivity higher on the scale. The problem is the size of items also matters. Small gold is low on the scale, and the larger the gold, the higher it reads on the scale. A silver quarter reads higher than a silver dime, etc.
      All manner of ferrous trash including medium and smaller nails fall where they should when using discrimination and are easily tuned out. The problem is large iron and steel items, and ferrous but non-magnetic materials like stainless steel. Steel plates, large bolts, broken large square nails, axe heads, hammer heads, broken pry bar and pick tips, etc. all tend to read as high conductive targets. Usually it is just the sheer size pushing it higher up the scale.
      Detectors also love things with holes, which makes for a perfect target by enabling and enhancing near perfect eddy currents, making items appear larger than they really are. Steel washers and nuts are a big problem in this regard, often reading as non-ferrous targets.
      Oddball shapes cause problems, particularly in flat sheet steel. Old rusted cans often separate into irregular shaped flat pieces, and roofing tin (plated steel) and other sheet steel items are my number one nemesis around old camp sites. Bottle caps present a similar issue in modern areas. These items produce complex "sparky" eddy currents with both ferrous and non-ferrous indications. Many thin flat steel items produce remarkably good gold nugget type signals in old camp areas.
      Two general tips. Concentric coils often handle ferrous trash better than DD coils. A DD coil is often the culprit when dealing with bottle caps where a concentric coil often makes them easy to identify. Another thing is to use full tones. Many ferrous items are producing both ferrous and non-ferrous tones. Blocking ferrous tones allows only the non-ferrous tone to be heard, giving a clear "dig me" signal. This was the real bane of single tone machines with a simple disc knob to eliminate ferrous objects. You still heard the non-ferrous portion of the signal. Multi tones allows you to hear the dual ferrous/non-ferrous reports from these troublesome items, helping eliminate most of them.
      Certain detectors can also show multiple target responses on screen at once, like the White's models featuring the SignaGraph (XLT, DFX, etc.) and CTX with target trace. These displays show target "smearing" that stands out differently from the clean VDI responses produced by most good items. A machine with a simple VDI numeric readout can only show you one number at a time and the only indication you might get is "dancing" numbers that refuse to lock on. Usually though the predominate response overrides and fakes you out. This is where a good high end visual display capable of putting all VDI response on screen simultaneously can really help out.
      I have been collecting these odd iron and steel items to practice with and to help me evaluate which machines might do best in ferrous trash. The main thing I wanted to note here is contrived internet videos with common round nails often present a misleading picture. Many machines do very well on nails yet fail miserably on flat steel.
      Steel Trash Testing


×