Jump to content
phrunt

Question About Ace 350 Shaft Being Too Close To Coil

Recommended Posts

I have been playing with my Garrett Euroace (Ace 350) for the past couple of days, working it out and learning the machine to teach my daughter how to use it.  I was air testing some modern coinage to see what notches on the target ID scale they come up as so I could set up her discrimination. I got lazy and started waving them on the detector side of the coil, I noticed I was able to detect the coins all the way up to past where the shaft changes from plastic to metal, this is at 40cm, 15.7 inches in the old digits, this was with the coil straight too so when it's tilted it's even closer to the metal part of the shaft.

This means the coil is obviously seeing the metal shaft, if the coil is moving such as adjusting it's tilt I noticed the detector gets a target in when in all metal, if I use my heavy coin discrimination pattern it doesn't false when the coil moves.  I was wondering why this was falsing when the coil moves was happening yesterday until today when I was able to duplicate it when I discovered by accident I could detect coins past where the shaft changes to metal, it's the coil picking up the metal shaft!!! If I move the coil with it sitting on my table, even the slightest bit it rings off on the shaft! 

I realize I've not got the stock coil on there and the Nel Tornado is known as a deep coil but this is now a problem for me and the only solution I can think of is to notch out the discrimination point where the shaft sits so it can't see it, but then it may miss good targets in that range too.

I don't want to put the stock coil back on it, the stock coil wasn't too great and I really like this Tornado coil.

20181102_151618.jpg.95fdcba7a060ac1e3ee53ec90f24b71d.jpg

Are there aftermarket shafts for Garrett that have a longer lower shaft? or is there some shaft from another detector I could mount it on that is longer in the plastic part?  I'm not a big fan of the shaft anyway, it doesn't even have Cam locks so a replacement shaft wouldn't be such a bad option.

20181102_151557.thumb.jpg.3ab34e23d2a3745b5d84b8dd04760aae.jpg

Here is a quick video showing a coin detecting past the shaft change over point, the amazing thing is the Target ID for the coin is bang on where it should be even at that depth.

 

 

Any help with this one would be appreciated as I've now given the detector to my daughter who decided she likes detecting now (finally) as she has a yellow bumble bee looking detector that can discriminate virtually everything out except our gold coins 🙂

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, if the coil moves against the shaft, it can produce false signals ... if the coil has a sufficiently long range ... "You can use a camlock to remove the free movement of the coil, or you can use a long lower shaft .., I made a few measurements of my Ace 400. Perhaps it will help you...the bottom of the Garrett bar has a diameter of 20.0-20.15mm and a length of 50cm. You can use the bottom rod from the Equinox minelab 60cm... or other 20mm Rod...

november 3 iphone 5S 2018 003_DxO.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect, so I just need a Ace 400 lower rod which they've made longer than the 350 lower rod probably for my exact problem, i guess when they made the Ace 350 they never expected coils to go so deep. I guess it might be easier to get an Equinox lower Rod, thanks very much! Very helpful.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can only get camlock, and adjust the bar from ACE 350 ..

November 4 iphone 5S 2018 001_DxO.jpg

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'll try find somewhere selling Cam locks then 🙂

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps you could put a dab of epoxy on the button of the camlock to make it go tighter.

You can see now why I made my shaft out of Kevlar.

I tread lightly because so many use Carbon fiber right to the coil and even using clunky metal cam locks now, to each his own. I feel like I am going to have to preemptively defend myself, but I will remind others that I am entitled to follow the form follows function mantra just as they are entitled to use metal coil bolt like in the old days.

Does it matter? When we are talking about finding treasure, how would you ever know?

Here is what you can do to test it.

1. Test a coin for depth, let's say it goes to 12"

2. Place a beer can beside coil and repeat step 1.

The result is you can't see the coin at all!

At the very least placing more metal near your coil is going to negatively affect your depth and sensitivity to small items.

Interesting conversation, thanks for sharing.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Alluminati ....We also try to eliminate any metal that is within reach of the coil by using the lower carbon rod - the result is also weight loss, improved equilibrium and also the stiffness of the detector. Yes aramid-Kevlar also stands behind the idea...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EL NINO77, do you have a piece of carbon rod handy that you can put a silver coin inside of the tube and see what happens when you try to detect it?

I don't have anything nearby that I can think of that is carbon fiber.

If you can still detect the coin inside the tube to your satisfaction, then you should be alright. If the coin disappears then you have problem.

Carbon fiber is electrically conductive, you can induce a electrical current through it in a magnetic field. In water, particularly salt water you may experience galvanic corrosion if metal parts are not isolated from it. 

How conductive it is will depend on your particular tube, how much of it is resin, how long are the fibers and how they are oriented.
You may note that on the CTX, ETrac, Anderson shaft etc they have plastic for the last 4"-6" of their carbon shaft. This gets the carbon well up and almost behind the coil. I suspect this is about the practical limit for that particular sized, 11" coil. With a smaller coil you could probably go a little closer with carbon. 

For comparison, I have a detector here from 1985 with a 8" coil and an aluminum lower shaft. It has a 4" plastic yoke attached towards the rear of the coil with a plastic bolt.  It looks like good rule of thumb would be to keep any conductive rod at least half your coil diameter away, keep it out of the radius of your coil.

Conversely, Kevlar is a synthesized polyamide similar to wool and silk. It is organic, transparent to radio waves making it the preferred choice in applications like this.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the truth of the carbon composite can affect the working coils, on my carbon rod equinox  I have a plastic ABS head. My first modified detector had a glass fiber rod.

sony sola 1073 (600 x 337).jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By phoenix
      Clearly, with the huge amount of interest that is being shown in the after market coils for 7000, it`s obvious that there is a market out there for coils other than 14'' and 19".       I don`t take the 19" out much because I have had very little success with it and with my bad wrists it`s just too damn heavy, but Minelab did tell us in the early days of marketing the 7000 that they would be releasing a 11" coil down the track, and now there is another company that nobody has ever heard of making a huge range of coils that are lighter and have so far been very well received by the public.
      What`s going on Minelab?
    • By GB_Amateur
      I have a Vaquero with the stock 8"x9" concentric coil.  I'm wondering if I should get a DD.  There are quite a few out there, for example the Tesoro 5"x10" (stock on the Lobo SuperTraq) and similar size (open structure, though) by Mars and also Cors/Nel.  I'm only interested in coin hunting with this detector.  Anyone out there with experience care to comment whether or not I'll see (hear!) much difference if I get one of the DD's?
    • By AussieDigs
      G’day Guys,
      Can anyone say if this coil is a mono or DD please? It was supplied by the seller with the QED.
      Thanks.
      Al.

    • By araratgold
      Gidday All,
      Managed to get two hours in today before rain chased me home with the 17 inch Russian X coil.
      Blew me away just how good this coil is ! I purposely picked a small area of State forest that I have flogged for the last 10 years, with all 3 different GPX detectors, with coils from 11-25 inches, the SDC, and even a QED. This spot has yielded many ounces of gold to me from 0.05g up to 33g. I had declared it " dead ", as my last 10 or so efforts with the standard GPZ14 and GPZ19 have yielded nothing more.
      2 hours in today, nearly back to the car, and I get an obvious signal. This was slightly downhill from a small patch of small reef gold, in an area that I have literally smashed.
      Coil was about 2 inches above the ground because of sticks and clumpy grass. Removed said obstacles and signal firmer. 4 inches in and I am in nice gravel, target now screaming, out pops what turns out to be buck shot. Bugger, but this is from a spot that I have NEVER managed to get a target in ! 
      Moved about 10m along and same thing, another obvious target, once again coil 2 inches over the ground. Dug in and same again, 4 inches down in nice gravel, target screaming louder than the buckshot, out pops what turns out to be an 0.65 gram bit of reef gold ! I'll be buggered, I thought ! 
      Rain then chased me home.
      Coil was very sensitive, being able to pick up my 0.11g test piece at 2 inches. I tried knocking the coil against a tree a few times and no bump sensitivity. 17 round weighs the same as the GPZ14. All in all, a fantastic coil. Don't know what the Russians have done differently, but Minelab need to have a good hard look ! 
      Further testing to come when our shitty weather finally breaks.
      Cheers, Rick
       

    • By nugget hunter nz
      So just spoke to the guy I get my minelab threw and aparently the new russian could that people are getting great results with on the gpz ane bow in process of testing some for the gpx so will be interesting to see how they go
    • By kiwijw
      Monday two weeks back I headed to the spot where I had done well with the 15 x 14 X coil getting 12 bits off an old flogged patch first time going over it with the 15 x 14 coil.

      Over Easter Weekend I went back & searched a bit wider with the 15 x 14 X coil. Getting 17 pieces.

      Monday two weeks back I decide to try the 10 x 9 coil over the first area I used the 15 x 14 coil. Mrs JW came along for the day.
      I parked up in the same spot as the first time & went straight to the spot where I got 4 bits all in a 2 foot square area. High Yield/Normal. Sensitivity on 19. I had hardly put the coil on the ground when I got a signal. Of course I was thinking shotgun pellet. You will see a hole above the coil from my last dig here that the rabbits have dug back out & top left disturbed ground from the previous digs.

      This signal was to the left of the coil.
      Small gold it was

      Not two feet away another very faint signal right up against a tuft of tussock grass. I pushed the grass over with my boot as best I could to get the coil in closer & confirm a signal. Definitely a signal but I hacked the grass out to pin point it better & to get the coil over the top of it & right down on to the ground. Signal improved.

      Down a good 6 inches, maybe a tad more.

      The tufts of grass are dying off but still pretty stiff for the coil to flatten down. With the 15 x 14 coil I couldn't get the coil down on to the ground among this grass. The 10 x 9 I was able to negotiate a lot better.

      I ended up getting 7 bits in this very small area. It was just crazy.
      Some quite deep for their small size

       

      I then moved on to another little area & managed a couple more.

       

       

       

      A total of 9 before calling it quits & the long drive home.

      The piece top right intrigued me. You will notice the sun glistening off one face. It was almost a perfect crystalline pyramid shape. With equal square four sided base terminating four faces at the top pyramid apex point. 
       

       

      9 for just over 2 grams.

      Fairly rough reef gold, but damned if I can find the source. I have been trying for 7 years. Cheers
      Good luck out there
      JW 🤠
×
×
  • Create New...