Jump to content
Ridge Runner

Is The Day Of A Single Frequency Detector Past ?

Recommended Posts

It is so many single frequency detectors out there and yes some do have more you can access. It really don’t make any difference it’s still one frequency at a time.

What I can’t understand is more are being made and if not on the market already like we’ve seen this year . It will be another nugget and coin detector should be out by the end of November. Oh it’s telling how many frequency you can hunt in but still one at a time.

I know I sound like a broken record saying one at a time but that’s the truth of the matter.

 When Minelab came out with the Equinox they raised the bar at a higher level that others have yet to reach . This is what all of the other detector companies have to strive for . If they can just equal the Equinox will keep them in the running. 

I don’t see Minelab just sitting back without looking at the Equinox saying how can we make it better. 

I myself is swinging a single frequency detector and I do like it . I’m not saying they don’t have a place in the detector market but over time will be less and less . 

 I’ve owned a Equinox 800 and I loved it but had it with the wait on a small coil so I sold it. If some others don’t come out with something to equal it in early 2019 I’ll get me another Nox .

Chuck

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CZ two at time.  DFX two at a time.  Minelab BBS & FBS three channel at a time, V3 three at a time.   Equinox two at a time.

What the Equinox brings to the table that is different from past multifreq is the ability to select which two freqs are matched together via the program selections.

HH
Mike

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike

 Everyone you said is inside other than the Nox  a sardine can and got the weight to go with it.

 Who said the Equinox can run only in two frequency ? It is what you call a true Mult Frequency detector.

 Like history it’s in the pass and some not all detectors are too .

 Chuck 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what one can do One frequency-every frequency has its own advantages and disadvantages, while Multifrequency .. can use these benefits and suppress the inconveniences. The next multifrequency is much more information and data about the signal that is to be processed into the detector .. Even a single-frequency detector can be very good if it is properly designed and set on a given field ...and the same type  of searching...
 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marketing speak requires a different dictionary.   Rather than tell you outright which of the five frequencies are being combined/processed for a certain target group for a certain program, they just say the program is 'weighted' toward that target group.   Fairly easy to deduce which ones are in play for each program just by looking at the target group of the program.   I'm not saying its a bad detector or that its not a true multi-frequency detector.  

What I would like see in true simultaneous multi-frequency detectors is the ability to select frequencies to correlate target responses with.   The Whites V3 correlate feature is big step forward in multi-frequency discrimination processing.   I hope someone will build upon that someday and take it to the next step or build more functionality around it.  

HH

Mike

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure the Equinox runs all 5 frequencies at once, this is proven at my house when in gold mode and multi frequency which is heavily weighted to the 20 and 40khz. I get bad interference from my house however when you bounce through all the single frequencies 5khz is the problem one and the others are stable so it shows even in gold mode in multi frequency 5khz must be enabled.

That's one of the reasons why in the Equinox v2 or if we are extremely lucky with a firmware update they give you a way to disable a certain frequency when in multi frequency.  I've stumbled across the same situation detecting near ski lifts where 5khz is causing me issues in multi so I've had to drop back to single frequencies or really lower my sensitivity but I've found dropping back to 15khz and leaving my sensitivity high has worked the best for me in that situation.  It's not a big problem and it doesn't pose a problem often but there is always ways to improve on perfection ?

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike

 I have to agree with you that White’s has some great platforms to work off of but will they do it. That’s the big question.

 Chuck 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, phrunt said:

I am sure the Equinox runs all 5 frequencies at once, this is proven at my house when in gold mode and multi frequency which is heavily weighted to the 20 and 40khz. I get bad interference from my house however when you bounce through all the single frequencies 5khz is the problem one and the others are stable so it shows even in gold mode in multi frequency 5khz must be enabled.

Park MF is 7.8k+39k.

Beach MF is 7.8k+18.5k.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if there is even a possibility of many other manufacturers doing multi frequency machines? I would think there is only so many ways it could be achieved and you can bet Minelab have a patent on the method they're using. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Geotech said:

Park MF is 7.8k+39k.

Beach MF is 7.8k+18.5k.

Nice little nugget there.

How about Gold and Field, how do the "weighings" change these numbers, or is that done after the fact?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By garikfox
      These discontinued Minelab products are really cool to look at and read about. I was amazed.
      The Golden Hawk looked cool! Wonder what the Klondike looked like.
       

      https://www.minelab.com/usa/support/knowledge-base/discontinued-products
    • By Ridge Runner
      If what we see of the face of the Vanquish is true with eighteen notch points then it’s bundled.
       This happens in lower end detectors but not totally true being it came in higher cost detector too  My Sport  wasn’t cheap but it too has the problem of having notch bundle .
       I have the ORX and to cut out anything I start at the bottom and work my way up . Like others I can’t pick what I want delete what I don’t want.
       The only one that we all know that will let you notch out what you don’t want and leave the others is the Nox .
       This is the main reason I don’t like my Sport is because of that. Don’t get me wrong I’d like it to run in more than one frequency but I knew that ahead of my purchase.
        I guess you couldn’t make me happy if you would hang me with a new rope. 
      Just thinking out loud again! So why don’t you do the same here.
       Chuck 
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Check this beauty out. Five km range and depths of up to 75 meters. And only $2500! 


    • By pinpointa
      Hi Guys,
      How many detector brands have Mixed Mode.  Thanks in advance.
       
    • By Andyy
      Just thought... it would be interesting if the technology ever came about where you could run one detector as either a VLF or a PI (orZVT).  What machines would you combine?
      I would go GPZ and Equinox
    • By GB_Amateur
      I started this project 2 or 3 years ago (so long I can't remember).  Spurred on by recent field experiences and also a recent thread on Equinox settings I've finally finished it. I don't know if it's a completely new idea.  I call it a 'test-stand' as opposed to 'test garden' just to distinguish it from the standard test gardens many of you either already have or at least are familiar with.  There are other similar variable depth test gardens out there (seen on YouTube).  This one has the advantage of continuous depth capability.  It also allows 3-d target orientation angle (similar to pitch, roll, yaw of airplane).  It's based upon the 30-60-90 triangle (remember that from geometry/trigonometry class in high school?):

      Here is a sketch which shows how to implement this concept:

      Shown in the sketch, buried at an angle, is a PVC pipe.  A test target can be slid into the pipe a distance 2*d which will result in it being located at depth d.  I used two sections of pipe (ID = 1.57 in., OD = 1.90 in.), side-by-side to allow me to put neighboring targets in the ground with some option of how close the two targets are separated.  Think of this as burying a double barrel (side-by-side) shotgun with the stock end deep in the ground.  All you see are the ends of the two barrels.  The concrete (bag of Kwicrete) locks the pipes in place.  Here's a closeup of those extruding barrels:

      Besides the tape measure (units of inches) you also see a hand-graded scale at left which I'll explain shortly.  Here is an overall view:

      The two PVC caps, attached together, are for keeping water, dirt, and varmints out of the pipes when not in use.  You'll notice a 1.5 in. diameter wooden dowel rod inserted into one of the pipes. More detail on that shortly, but the target is inserted into the dowel near its end and then the dowel is slid into the pipe.  Holes for locating pins (you can see one of those -- gray plastic -- inserted to register the intended depth) are 1 inch apart leading to a depth resolution of 1/2 inch.  (Again, refer to the 30-60-90 diagram to understand the relationship between insertion length and actual depth into the ground -- a 2::1 ratio.)
      Next I show the business end of the dowel rod:

      The black foam fills the chamber and holds the target (in this case a silver dime) in place.  The hole in the dowel is actually lined with a plastic film canister (remember those from 35 mm film days?) which has been modified to conform to the circular cross-section of the dowel and thus be able to fit into the pipe.  The second slightly smaller) large hole was put in there originally for a second target but so far I haven't used it -- likely of limited value.  You can see the registration holes.  The first one has a red '2'  (difficult to see) just above it; the next (representing 2.5" depth) isn't labeled; the third one has a '3'; etc.  These represent the resultant depth of the target when a registration pin is put in that hole and then the rod slid into the pipe until the registration pin keeps the dowel from going deeper.
      Although the chamber packing material can be made up of many materials, I chose ethafoam (polyethylene foam) high quality packing material.  You typically find this in higher end electronics packaging such as with desktop computers.  More commonly it is white but in this case I used black.  I initially cut plugs with hole saw (see next photo) and then trim with a pocket knife as needed to fit the pipe:

      Ok, so now you're still wondering what that specially graded (homemade 'yardstick') is for.  Again, referring back to the 30-60-90 triangle drawing, the 3rd side of the triangle is also related to the depth.  It is squareroot of 3 times the depth.  (Squareroot of 3 = 1.73.)  That yardstick will indicate how far downrange (along the ground surface) that the target is located.  This helps when you get an iffy response on your detector and want to confirm or deny that the surface location of the target is consistent with its depth.  The units written on the scale are associated with the depth of the target.  You can see from the sketch above that the max depth is 15".  The largest common US coin that will fit the chamber (with some force...) is a half dollar.
      I didn't keep track of the cost but it's probably $30 or so, mostly for the PVC pipe and caps and the dowel rods plus a bag of Sacrete.  (I'm counting labor as free.  😁)
      OK, now that I (finally!) finished this test-stand it's time to get busy making measurements.  I'll be posting those here on the forum as they become available.
       
×
×
  • Create New...