Jump to content
Ridge Runner

How Much Are You Willing To Pay For The Orx

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Alluminati said:

I think they are scared to venture from the path they carved with the Deus.

The Orx should of had a wired coil and been less money.

I would pay $600 Canadian for one. ($450 US dollars)

I think they should have just offered it for less money period. 

Using a wired coil means that they would have had to move the "brains" to the control unit (it presently exists in the coil), would have made the existing Deus coils incompatible, and they would have had to have sunk Research and Development dollars into the new coil designs and control packages which would have driven up hardware and software costs in the end. 

I think the wireless coil paradigm of Deus is an important selling point, keeps weight down, and allows re-use of Deus coils which might make ORX an attractive less expensive alternative backup unit to their Deus units.  But again, they missed the mark on their MAP.

They were facing a dilemma similar to ML.  How do you introduce a new, affordable mid-range detector to challenge the market place without obsoleting your current "high end" detector line.  I think ML figured out a way to thread that needle with Equinox and a little marketing (along the lines of touting how Multi IQ is a game changer yet FBS still brings something to the table that Multi IQ does not, um OK).

XP took a different tack.  They made a less capable detector (solely via software limitations) with the same basic hardware s Deus (save for a lighter stem and rod and less capable wireless headphones) but could not bring themselves to lower the price enough to be competitive for fear of having to also lower the Deus cash cow price. 

Lets face it. With the hardware being basically the same, limiting the software you provide on the unit should not inherently limit the per unit cost (i.e., unit cost to manufacture is not driven by the software on the unit and basically minimal R&D was invested).  That is also why I really scratch my head on the price delta between 600 and 800.  That price delta is not driven by the lesser software driven capability of the 600.  It is driven simply by the 800 wireless hardware (BT headphones and WM wireless receive module) the 600 package lacks.  The detector hardware package is basically exactly the same for both 600 and 800 save for the LCD screen pattern and the extra "user profile" button.

However, I wouldn't mind getting an ORX at the right price point as a cheaper backup to the Deus, but it is also missing just a couple "essential" features IMO.  Namely, pitch audio and audio response adjustments that enable adjustment on the modulation of the tone ID audio with depth (otherwise, you have a target size/depth modulation problem similar to what Equinox has now).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing, why would they compete against themselves even if it does save RnD?

A cheaper wired machine with the Deus performance would do better in a 2nd and 3rd world market IMO which is the target market. Incidentally it would make it more palatable in north America, UK and EU too.

It doesn't have to be wired mind you, I'm just going by the old assumptions that it is cheaper, nowadays a couple little IC's might actually be cheaper then 6' of good copper wire. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Alluminati said:

That's the thing, why would they compete against themselves even if it does save RnD?

A cheaper wired machine with the Deus performance would do better in a 2nd and 3rd world market IMO which is the target market. Incidentally it would make it more palatable in north America, UK and EU too.

It doesn't have to be wired mind you, I'm just going by the old assumptions that it is cheaper, nowadays a couple little IC's might actually be cheaper then 6' of good copper wire. lol

Yeah, I agree with you that wired is an easier, less costly approach as a starting point, but if you've already got the bugs worked out with wireless approach, why bother.  Those wireless chips are inexpensive.  Complete do it yourself configurable Raspberry PI microprocessor units with built in WIFI and Bluetooth modules go for about $35 US.  The more I think about his the more I think, why bother with the ORX at all XP.  Just lower the price on the Deus and be done with it (provide the less capable ORX wireless headphones with Deus if you want a tangible reason to lower the Deus price further).  Note that at present the ORX wireless headphones do not work with the Deus controller and the Deus wireless headphones will not work with the ORX controller.  SMH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a $499 price for it would have been more ball park for what it is. $899 is too high for what I would spend on one.  Then again I wasn't really wow'ed by the Deus and think it should be more of that $700-800 price range for the full package, remote, headphones, and your choice of coil.  I would like to retry one with a HF or X35 coil with the higher frequencies.  Was supposed to get to borrow one with HF coil from a buddy but haven't yet.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

The XP HF 9.5" x 5"elliptical really holds its own and typically exceeds the performance of the 6" Equinox coil in restricted swing situations and mineralized ground when hunting relics.  I know because I have tested them head to under the same brutal iron and mineralized soil conditions.  I call the XP HF elliptical the "laser pointer" because the combination of 28 khz operation and lightning fast Deus/ORX recovery really make the coil a killer in trash pits, around logs, and in hot soil.  The Equinox 6" coil has no real advantage over the 9.5" HF elliptical and honestly I wish ML would have come out with an elliptical similar in dimension to the XP offering that would provide the restricted swing advantage and separation ability of the narrow elliptical shape with the ground coverage afforded by the 9.5" long dimension.  A missed opportunity by ML in my opinion.  

Since Orx is aimed at prospectors I should point out prospectors want small coils because they are physically smaller and fit into crevices, nooks, and crannies where larger coils can’t go. They are also hotter on the tiniest stuff. It’s not a separation issue. The lack of a small coil that every competing nugget detector offers is a pretty big ding against the Orx from a prospecting perspective. My Gold Bug 2, the 3.5” x 6.5” was practically glued to the machine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

Since Orx is aimed at prospectors I should point out prospectors want small coils because they are physically smaller and fit into crevices, nooks, and crannies where larger coils can’t go. They are also hotter on the tiniest stuff. It’s not a separation issue. The lack of a small coil that every competing nugget detector offers is a pretty big ding against the Orx from a prospecting perspective. My Gold Bug 2, the 3.5” x 6.5” was practically glued to the machine.

Thanks, Steve.  I mispoke and should have clarified that what I meant by separation is swing separation or more correctly swing "clearance" (i.e., the ability to swing the coil side to side in tight spots).  In that respect, the Deus elliptical coil actually has slightly more swing clearance with the 5" width coil than the Equinox 6" diameter round coil.  Agree, a shorter coil would allow for more crevice clearance.  Obviously, separation is fixed on a DD by the receive/transmit coil overlap width at the center of the coil.

ORX may be geared toward the prospector, but ORX or not, XP has always promoted the HF coils as primarily prospecting coils (as you know, ORX uses the same Gold Field program as Deus, so there is nothing obviously superior about the ORX vs. Deus as far as prospecting is concerned).  If that is the case I wonder why XP has not pursued a coil form factor smaller than 9.5x5" for prospecting?  It has been almost 2 years since the original release of the HF coils.  I wonder if they are out of touch with what the prospector's need or want or whether prospecting is actually driving a significant percentage of Deus/ORX/Depar sales considering the limited coil offerings.

Welcome your thoughts on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chase, I was not talking Equinox really just Orx versus other prospecting detectors. A roughly 4" x 6" coil is standard for small nugget machines. I agree about more coils for Equinox, but again, back to Orx.

I see nothing Orx does better for gold prospecting versus Deus, which is why I started the prospecting thread asking what other prospectors think. Just one glaring example - no ground tracking on Orx? Not a big deal per se but I would have not left a feature like that off a gold prospecting machine. And no ground notch? It appears to me that XP is not will to let Orx be absolutely superior to Deus even when it comes to gold prospecting. A Deus with a HF coil appears to be a better gold prospecting machine than an Orx, and that is sure not how I would have done it. Just the opposite. I would have made sure Orx matched Deus in every way for gold prospecting, then made it even more compelling. This should not even be a question, and the fact it is does not help.

I visit most all the major gold prospecting forums regularly, and the simple fact is nobody but me is discussing the Equinox in the gold prospecting world. Almost zero mention, and the lack of positive responses on my prospecting thread is telling.

I actually like the machine and am not trying to beat up on it. Mostly I am just sort of puzzled by the whole thing. The big thing is XP adding so much capability to the Deus starter bundle that it is a solid question whether an XP Deus Starter Bundle at $799 is a better value than an Orx at $899. If XP had not added the extra menu functions to the headphones it would be an easy question.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/10/2019 at 2:24 PM, Steve Herschbach said:

Just one glaring example - no ground tracking on Orx? Not a big deal per se but I would have not left a feature like that off a gold prospecting machine. And no ground notch?

Steve.  Note that I am almost certain that this is actually no different than Deus.  Tracking and Ground notch do not appear to be engaged when using the equivalent Gold Field program on the Deus from what I can tell. Gold Field uses a unique (to Gold Field) ground grab method using the pinpoint button.  According to the manual, you must periodically redo the ground grab if you encounter instability (implying tracking does not come into play). 

I too thought tracking and ground notch worked in gold field mode because you can actually access the settings while in gold field, but from what I can tell based on the manual, they don't do anything (similar to iron volume not actually doing anything in full tones even though you can change the setting).  I still have to verify this with XP or Andy Sabisch but that was something I just recently realized as I was comparing Deus and ORX specs while digging deep into the Deus user manual.

If true, then it seems that ORX almost exactly duplicates the Deus Gold Field functionality but adds a stripped down/basic version of the "tone ID" Deus modes for traditional target detecting.

Now why they didn't implement Deus-like tracking in the ORX coin/relic modes is indeed a mystery, although for those not familiar with Deus, I suppose it results in a simpler interface as the ground balance ground grab method is the same between the modes.

Your observations that no one is talking about Equinox from a prospecting perspective astounds me.

And I am as mystified as you are regarding XP's strategy on ORX.

I will post back if I am wrong about tracking GB in Gold Field on Deus.

 

Well it turns out I am wrong on this, after consulting the first edition of the Deus Handbook (the Deus User's manual is ambiguous on this).  Tracking and Ground Notch DO work while in gold field mode as long as mineralization based variations in ground phase are not "too severe".  I have not confirmed that anything has changed since they added the ground sensitivity adjustment starting with Version 4.2 of the Deus software, but there you have it.  Setting the record straight.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good info Chase. The non-Goldfield modes can be used effectively as gold prospecting alternatives, and in fact I was pretty pleased with GM Power for finding small gold nuggets.

XP has never had a name in the prospecting world so I am not surprised at the lack of interest. Prospectors also tend to be hardcore old school types who like knobs, replaceable batteries, and robust physical designs. Given that the U.S. and Australian markets are already heavily saturated with nugget detectors it is getting very hard for newcomers to stir up interest. The Makro Gold Kruzer also made no waves and outside this website even the White's Goldmaster 24K has got little notice. It's notable enough I posted about it here.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

you asked about differences in the gold modes on the Orx and Deus.

I was wondering if the ground balance procedure for the Orx in its two gold modes is the same as the procedure for the Deus in Gold Field?

I am still not comfortable with the peculiar ground balancing of the Deus in Gold Field. I guess I need to keep practicing.

 

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      XP Deus Australia Detectorist.com.au Published on Dec 18, 2018 - The XP ORX Metal Detector Has been released and the main question is, "Which coil do I choose?" This video gives you a brief run down of each coil and recommends which way to go for your new ORX metal Detector.
       
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Interesting - a dedicated gold machine by XP incorporating the new high frequency coil and marketed in Africa at a very low price, only $680 http://www.depardetector.com/product/depar/dpr-600/912/511
      Note 9/14/2018 - It took almost two years but it appears the Depar DPR 600 is finally coming to countries other than Africa - announcing the new XP ORX!

      Depar DPR 600 gold nugget detector by XP
      It certainly raises some questions. The first being, will we be able to buy this machine from XP dealers, or is it some sort of special deal for Depar? Personally I would be irritated by that were it to prove to be the case. I think many people here would rather buy this machine at a far lower price than buying a full blown DEUS and then having to pay even more to get the high frequency coil as an accessory.
      The video gives an idea how the high frequency coils may act. A big shocker for me - the elliptical version of the coil is said to operate at 20, 40, and 80 kHz! (See video). Is this what we will see in the high frequency elliptical for the DEUS? The round HF coil is said to operate at 15, 30, and 60 (56) kHz which is in line with what has been previously advertised.
      Depar DPR 600 Owner's Manual
       


    • By Steve Herschbach
      OK, let's talk XP ORX. This is an offshoot of the XP DEUS that is set up more specifically for gold prospectors, though it does still retain some basic coin, jewelry, and relic features. Everything nugget hunting has been moved front and center, with other features pushed to the background. The XP Orx features the two new high frequency (HF) coils as one of the two options at time of purchase - either the 9.5" x 5" HF coil or 9" round HF coil. The new X35 coils offer three lower frequency coil options compatible with the Orx. The older black low frequency (LF) coils are not compatible with the Orx.

      XP ORX metal detector for gold prospecting and more
      The Orx like the Deus is a selectable frequency detector. You can choose from one of several frequencies depending on the coil you are using. The frequency is dependent on the coil. The ORX high frequency coils give you a choice of three operating frequencies which cover most detection needs. The optional X35 coils have five frequency options. All primary frequencies have numerous offsets available to help alleviate electrical interference, but these shifts are so small as to make no performance difference. Ignore the statements about 21 frequencies and 35 frequencies as marketing games. The round 9’’ coil runs at 15 kHz, 30 kHz and 50 kHz. The elliptical coil has a higher top end frequency 15 kHz, 30 kHz and 80 kHz. The optional X35 coils run at a lower range of 4 kHz, 8 kHz, 12 kHz, 17 kHz and 25 kHz.

      XP ORX coil options and specifications
      For those familiar with the XP Deus there are some key differences. The rod / shaft assembly has been remade out of injection molded plastic, eliminating the aluminum and rubber grip. This both lowers the cost of the rod assembly as one of the more expensive parts of the Orx to manufacture plus reduces the weight even more. The Deus is the lightest high end detector made and this shaves even more grams. The Orx rod and coil only weighs 770 grams or 1.7 lbs if you put the controller in your pocket.
      Another big difference is in the wireless headphones. All controls have been removed except power and volume. This means that unlike the Deus you must have the controller with you if you want to make any tuning changes at all. Other wireless headphones options are not listed in the accessory list in the ORX User Guide (see image at bottom of this post) and so I can only conclude that the other XP wireless headphone options are not compatible with the Orx.
      I have used the Deus HF elliptical coil and there is no reason to think the performance of this coil is any different using the Orx controller instead of the Deus controller. The coil itself is the detector after all and the coils are the same whether used on a Deus or an Orx. The only difference is in how the functionality is accessed and what features are available.
      The Orx controller as has been noted earlier is set up for gold prospectors first and foremost. Click images for larger versions....

      XP Orx controller and basic functions

      XP Orx basic screen functions displayed
      The Orx does not display target id information until a target is found. Then a pop-up screen appears, showing the target id number and a variable "iron probability" meter.

      XP ORX target id and iron probability meter
      The long story short is I have used the XP Deus with elliptical high frequency coil and I believe performance here will be identical. And as far as I am concerned the Deus HF coils are right up there with the best high frequency gold prospecting options out there. I am not a hair splitter, so from my perspective there are quite a few good detectors in this category. Rather than try and determine what finds gold better than the others I tend to focus more on big picture aspects to determine the machine I prefer over others. Things like weight or how waterproof a detector is can sort things out fast, and personal preference issues like feel on arm and how the audio sounds make a big difference to me.
      This is just my opinion but the appeal of the XP Orx is the very lightweight and very compact design. There is no other option as light on the arm except perhaps the for the Fisher Gold Bug 2 if you hip mount the control box. Then you are attached to the rod assembly by the coil cable. Not a huge deal, but the Orx being wireless gets rid of the possibility of that cable hanging up in brush.
      On the other hand the Orx is priced a little high compared to the other gold prospecting competition. This is not a problem per se as long as you get all the features you need or want. However, if it was I and I wanted to make this detector to compete as a gold prospector I would have made sure the Orx could lay claim to being at least as good at gold prospecting as the Deus and it would be best if the Orx actually could be said to be the better gold prospecting option compared to the Deus at least.
      Yet when you dig in it seems XP limited not just the coin hunting features but also some prospecting features. The big standout is no ground tracking on the Orx. Now I am not a huge fan of ground tracking but when you need it you tend to really need it, and for XP to leave tracking off the Orx when it is included on the Deus seems like a particularly poor choice since this is a detector intended for dealing with extreme ground conditions. Tracking comes at a cost normally, but it can be a huge aid in highly variable ground. I can live without it, but given the cost of the Orx as compared to the competition this feature should be included.
      The other items I am not sure of is ferrous handling. The ferrous tone break appears to be preset and not adjustable on the Orx though you can change the pitch of the ferrous tone. Instead of an adjustable tone break XP appears to be relying more on the iron probability meter for making decisions regarding whether to dig ferrous or not. I may be missing something but I don't think at this time that you get to choose where the dividing line is on what reports audibly as ferrous and what reports audibly as non-ferrous. Consider the jury out here on this question until more information is found. Most people don't care about it anyway, and it may that the Orx reliance on adjusting the IAR (Iron Amplitude Rejection) serves well enough that adjusting the breakpoint is not required.
      I am not really making any determinations here but I am just trying to lay out some details in hope it will help people make their own decisions. I have plenty of detectors that will detect small gold as well as the Deus or Orx so for me personally the thing that keeps me coming back to the XP machines is the crazy compact and lightweight design. Yet in looking over the features and price I personally lean more towards the Deus instead of the Orx. It seems to me XP is being stingy with features given the price and for just a little more money a Deus can eliminate questions about whether those features would be missed or not. If I had to buy right now I would be more inclined to get a Deus with 9" X35 coil. The top end frequency there of 27 kHz should do just fine on small gold and I would get features missing in the Orx. If I really needed extra high frequency hots I could add a high frequency coil as an option later.
      More to the point, XP is saying this is a lower price option to the Deus. Technically that is true of most Deus models, but as of V5 XP has added enough capability to the WS4 module that the $799 Deus Starter Package actually offers the Orx competition at an even lower price. In that regard XP sort of shot themselves in the foot by upgrading the WS4.
      Anyway, that's just a few thoughts from me on the Orx versus the Deus. I won't even attempt to get into the Orx versus all the competition other than to offer this chart below giving a big picture comparison. Given that the Orx is aimed at gold prospectors, and given how there is almost no mention of the detector on the prospecting forums I am very curious to hear people's thoughts on this model. Is XP doing the right thing here for prospectors? Or is it a swing and miss? Opinions?
      XP ORX Information Page
      XP ORX User Guide
      Over 30 khz (LF) gold prospecting metal detectors 1/2019

       
    • By Ridge Runner
      I was looking over the manual on the ORX and I was wondering what’s the best coil in the field detecting.
      The manual shows the 9” can run in 15,30 and up to 50 kHz. The Elliptical can run in 15 , 30 but can run in 80 KHz too . I can see if you plan on nugget hunting the 80 KHz could be more favorable for you. You can see it also hits the 15 and 30 KHz say for coin hunting. The real problem between the two coils is the depth as I can see it. I feel the round 9” could be a good nugget hunter but just can’t hit 80 KHz .
      I don’t plan on running out tomorrow and buying the ORX . I just like your opinion and to put your thinking caps on .
      It really don’t make any difference how many frequencies you can access it’s still a single frequency detector .
       Chuck 
      PS To get the full benefit of what this detector has to offer you need three coils.
×