Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Tnsharpshooter

Digging Deep Targets With Orx

Recommended Posts

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tnsharpshooter 

Thanks for posting the video. Hope someone one on this side of the water will make one and show the ID of American coins. The ORX has a pinpoint mode and I’d like to see how accurate it was . 

I had to stop typing this and look to see in the owners manual if it had a depth meter in one form are another. Just at a glance I can’t find a word about it.

 Chuck 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I went page by page from one end of the owners manual to the other and haven’t found nothing about a depth meter.

 I think you can find a depth meter on the cheapest detector on the market now days.

 Oh well.

 Chuck 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s being marketed as a nugget detector. Nobody uses depth meters on nugget detectors. GPZ 7000 for far more money - no depth meter. The Orx is a subset of the Deus capability and so if the Orx lacks features you want get the Deus.

  • Oh my! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gotta say that the orx seems to actually be a decently deep detector, while marketed as a gold machine it certainly seems to not have issues as a general purpose machine. 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't use my ORX as a gold detector. It will find coins if you run your coil over them. Did not buy it for use as a gold machine. There isn't much of anything out there showing how it does on American Coins, that I agree with. Call me stupid but mine is going to be used as a general purpose unit.  So far been happy with it, although I've not found a lot of good things with it yet. That's due to my horrible places to hunt. Will work on getting more areas until then I'm still in learning mode. Only have around 6 hrs time with it.

It does have its advantages. In my hard hunted yard that has seen numerous detectors over the years I still managed to pull out some coins (clads). Still that is an accomplishment. It has also shown that it will find coins in iron or around garbage. It's a bit chatty and you will feel as if you're in a machine gun testing field but the ORX can and does pull good from bad if you understand it. The ground condition bars are also nice as it tells the story about how much the ground varies, no more guessing if your soil is bad or not. In time will learn even more about it as my schedule permits. I DO miss a depth meter. Just some kind of idea on depth would be nice. Pinpointing with the ORX is a bit odd but once you use it a few times it begins making sense. The feature where you can narrow it down during pinpointing is useful but a bit awkward. Would be nice if XP put some kind of update out to make things a bit more friendly.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A person could alter reactivity setting while over a target or change modes with a different reactivity setting.  Based on signal strength or lack of signal when comparing a person may indeed get an idea on depth.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Tnsharpshooter said:

A person could alter reactivity setting while over a target or change modes with a different reactivity setting.  Based on signal strength or lack of signal when comparing a person may indeed get an idea on depth.

True,  But all of that takes TIME. Time to shift from one to the other and back again.  Time to compare.  The more time one spends dilly dallying about, the few targets one digs which USUALLY equates to fewer keepers at the end of the day.

That said once most of us become accustomed to a detector over time, the sound of a target signal (providing it is modulated), will usually give away the approximate depth. I do like the XP horseshoe on the Deus though and anticipated seeing it on the ORX.  I couldn't find it in the literature either. Or the X display. 

I guess there has to be enough technology separation to justify the difference in price and this was one of the sacrificed features.

 

Rich - 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Rich (Utah) said:

True,  But all of that takes TIME. Time to shift from one to the other and back again.  Time to compare.  The more time one spends dilly dallying about, the few targets one digs which USUALLY equates to fewer keepers at the end of the day.

That said once most of us become accustomed to a detector over time, the sound of a target signal (providing it is modulated), will usually give away the approximate depth. I do like the XP horseshoe on the Deus though and anticipated seeing it on the ORX.  I couldn't find it in the literature either. Or the X display. 

I guess there has to be enough technology separation to justify the difference in price and this was one of the sacrificed features.

 

Rich - 

Yep.  Time is valuable.  I only suggested what a user could do to get more intel as far as depth goes.  I am sticking with my Deus units.

Digging even a shallow hole with clad in it takes time. (Waste time).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Jeff McClendon
      So, I have an area in the Colorado Rockies that I am trying to successfully detect with the GMT 24K. The main issue here is tons of magnetite and I mean tons. Imagine a regular sized plastic sandwich bag with a 2" thick sandwich sized amount of dirt inside it instead of a sandwich. I brought a couple of bags full of dirt like this home from an area that appears to be a drainage ditch that was at the end of a sluice run in a hydraulicked area. I got almost 1 cup full of varying from speck to marble sized magnetite by panning out that bag of dirt, so about 1/3 of the dirt was magnetite. So far, I have detected this long trench with a GMT 24k and an XP ORX with 9"HF coil. The 24K shows 8 segments of mineralization and a phase reading of 85 in Ground Scan mode. The ORX ground balances at 88 with the mineralization bar full. The GMT 24k overloads at sensitivity 4, VSAT maximum in VCO audio and no iron cancel. The ORX does not overload but I have to constantly ground balance, with sensitivy on 70, reactivity on 2.5 and Disc IAR 2, frequency 50. Getting any kind of zip zip signal in this sea of double beep boings is proving difficult.
      As I said, I brought some dirt home to test. I figured with all of the advanced settings on the GMT 24K I should be able to find something that works. I took one of the bags outside and laid it flat on a plastic 24"x12" Igloo cooler. With the 24K, 6.5" concentric or 10X5" DD coils in VCO Zip audio mode, sensitivity 3, VSAT maximum, threshold 2, XGB auto, I got various amounts of ground noise and plenty of medium to loud double beep boings while bobbing the coil or swinging over the bag. Just what I expected. If I ground balanced and locked XGB when pumping the coil it almost silenced the magnetite and I could swing over the bag with much quieter, little responses but still clearly magnetite boings. If I then pressed the Iron Cancel button (iron cancel discrimination was set on the numeral 2 not 2 bars so no bars were showing) the magnetite was virtually silent. I switched to beep audio and still virtually silent with just a faint threshold response, meaning that instead of a high tone or low tone there was a faint, medium tone, 2 way threshold target tone apart from the reference threshold, I guess. I took a .2 gram flat nugget and placed it under the corner of the bag of dirt and reset the settings to what I started with, VCO zip tone, XGB auto, no Iron Cancel and carefully ground scanned over the area of the bag that the nugget was not under to let the XGB system reset. Sweeping the nugget a few times I got mostly boing magnetite signals with a very faint hard to distinguish zip sound. I pressed Iron Cancel (still set on number 2, also tried 1 with the same result, no disc bars showing) and got virtually nothing, with no zip zip responses of any kind. I locked the quietest XGB setting, with the lock button, no Iron Cancel and VCO audio. I got a nice zip zip with a little magnetite boing. I pressed Iron Cancel and literally got no signal of any kind, complete silence during sweeps. I thought WTH, and pressed the beep mode button for high and low tone pitch audio. I did not get a high tone or a low tone but I did get a very clear 2 way medium tone threshold response with a very quiet background except for the actual threshold tone.............? I removed the nugget and swept over the bag again with the same settings and got only a very faint medium pitched threshold?? tone occasional response. So, hunting this area in VCO audio, XGB locked, Iron Cancel off,  sens. on 3, VSAT maxed, might work but I would be digging a lot of magnetite. Hunting in Beep mode with Iron Cancel On and listening for that medium whatever it is tone might work too.......?
      There is no mention of this medium toned, what I am calling threshold tone response in the manual anywhere. I used to hear something like this on my MX5 using multi tone modes with the threshold set on low when I encountered a target that was just past the range of normal detection audio or numerical target ID detection. The MX5 let me know something was there. I am not sure what this tone is called or if it is the same thing that is happening on the 24K. Personally I like it if I can depend on it........... Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
      By the way, I ran the ORX and Equinox over the same target scenario. The ORX in Gold 1 with a little tweaking could hit the nugget but only with sensitivity turned way down (60 -70) in order to quiet the magnetite responses down enough to hear the target. Frequency 50 kHz, GB 88, Sensitivity 60 to 70, Reactivity 2.5 Disc IAR 1 or 2, Iron Volume off, Threshold 4,  tons of ground balancing required just to hear a clear zip, zip. The Equinox 800, 6" coil Gold 1 multi, -9 rejected,  GB 1, sensitivity 15, threshold 10, recovery speed 4 to 6, FE 0, had no problem giving a beautiful zip, zip on the .2 gram nugget with minimal ground noise............Hum!
      Jeff 
    • By Fskafish
      Does anyone know if there is a numbers to target vdi chart anywhere for the xp orx? I test mine with different targets but would like to see a chart confirming numbers.
    • By Chase Goldman
      Long time Deus user, but I am pretty convinced XP did something to juice Gold Mode on Orx vs. Deus' Gold Field  and it is my preferred mode for relic hunting, recently.  I like the 9" HF coil and hunt at 14 or 30 khz, typically.  Have not had problems hitting all kinds of silver, brass, and lead in moderately to high mineralized soil at various depths and junk target densities.  The one touch instant GB grab and pop up TID and Iron Probability meters enhance the user interface over Deus too.  ORX finds over the last couple months pictured below:

    • By Steve Herschbach
      XP DEUS / XP ORX Search Coil Chart
      Low Frequency (LF) Search Coils 4, 8, 12, 18 kHz 9" round, 11" round, 13" x 11" (discontinued September 2018) XP DEUS Only
      X35 Search Coils 4, 8 ,12 ,18, 25 kHz 9" round, 11" round, 13" x 11" XP DEUS and XP ORX
      High Frequency (HF) Search Coils 9" round 15, 30, 50 kHz and 10" x 5" 15, 30, 80 kHz XP DEUS and XP ORX
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Has anybody used both or have any opinions on which coil offers the most useful overall frequency range? With the X35 you have 4, 8, 12, 16, and 26 kHz and with the round HF coil you have 15, 30, and 55 kHz.
      It seems to me the X35 26 kHz is sufficient for most nugget detecting while offering frequencies as low as 4 kHz. I guess another way of asking would be has anyone really found the 55 kHz or 74 kHz settings to be that much better than the 30 kHz setting on the HF coils?
      I’m just speculating that for the die hard nugget hunter the HF coils make sense but with the ORX X35 wired headphone combo available for as low as $649 it might actually be the better option for the multi-use detectorist.

      XP ORX with 9" round HF coil or 9" round X35 coil options

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Getting to know your metaldetector and its features can be very demanding. This video explains how to quickly adapt the XP ORX Gold program for inland use along with other metal detecting top tips.
       
×
×
  • Create New...