Jump to content
Steve Herschbach

XP Orx For Gold Nugget Detecting?

Recommended Posts

OK, let's talk XP ORX. This is an offshoot of the XP DEUS that is set up more specifically for gold prospectors, though it does still retain some basic coin, jewelry, and relic features. Everything nugget hunting has been moved front and center, with other features pushed to the background. The XP Orx features the two new high frequency (HF) coils as one of the two options at time of purchase - either the 9.5" x 5" HF coil or 9" round HF coil. The new X35 coils offer three lower frequency coil options compatible with the Orx. The older black low frequency (LF) coils are not compatible with the Orx.

orx-by-xp-gold-nugget-detector.jpg
XP ORX metal detector for gold prospecting and more

The Orx like the Deus is a selectable frequency detector. You can choose from one of several frequencies depending on the coil you are using. The frequency is dependent on the coil. The ORX high frequency coils give you a choice of three operating frequencies which cover most detection needs. The optional X35 coils have five frequency options. All primary frequencies have numerous offsets available to help alleviate electrical interference, but these shifts are so small as to make no performance difference. Ignore the statements about 21 frequencies and 35 frequencies as marketing games. The round 9’’ coil runs at 15 kHz, 30 kHz and 50 kHz. The elliptical coil has a higher top end frequency 15 kHz, 30 kHz and 80 kHz. The optional X35 coils run at a lower range of 4 kHz, 8 kHz, 12 kHz, 17 kHz and 25 kHz.

xp-orx-coil-options-specifications.jpg
XP ORX coil options and specifications

For those familiar with the XP Deus there are some key differences. The rod / shaft assembly has been remade out of injection molded plastic, eliminating the aluminum and rubber grip. This both lowers the cost of the rod assembly as one of the more expensive parts of the Orx to manufacture plus reduces the weight even more. The Deus is the lightest high end detector made and this shaves even more grams. The Orx rod and coil only weighs 770 grams or 1.7 lbs if you put the controller in your pocket.

Another big difference is in the wireless headphones. All controls have been removed except power and volume. This means that unlike the Deus you must have the controller with you if you want to make any tuning changes at all. Other wireless headphones options are not listed in the accessory list in the ORX User Guide (see image at bottom of this post) and so I can only conclude that the other XP wireless headphone options are not compatible with the Orx.

I have used the Deus HF elliptical coil and there is no reason to think the performance of this coil is any different using the Orx controller instead of the Deus controller. The coil itself is the detector after all and the coils are the same whether used on a Deus or an Orx. The only difference is in how the functionality is accessed and what features are available.

The Orx controller as has been noted earlier is set up for gold prospectors first and foremost. Click images for larger versions....

new-xp-orx-metal-detector-gold-nugget-se
XP Orx controller and basic functions

xp-orx-screen-functions.jpg
XP Orx basic screen functions displayed

The Orx does not display target id information until a target is found. Then a pop-up screen appears, showing the target id number and a variable "iron probability" meter.

xp-orx-target-id-iron-probability-meter.jpg
XP ORX target id and iron probability meter

The long story short is I have used the XP Deus with elliptical high frequency coil and I believe performance here will be identical. And as far as I am concerned the Deus HF coils are right up there with the best high frequency gold prospecting options out there. I am not a hair splitter, so from my perspective there are quite a few good detectors in this category. Rather than try and determine what finds gold better than the others I tend to focus more on big picture aspects to determine the machine I prefer over others. Things like weight or how waterproof a detector is can sort things out fast, and personal preference issues like feel on arm and how the audio sounds make a big difference to me.

This is just my opinion but the appeal of the XP Orx is the very lightweight and very compact design. There is no other option as light on the arm except perhaps the for the Fisher Gold Bug 2 if you hip mount the control box. Then you are attached to the rod assembly by the coil cable. Not a huge deal, but the Orx being wireless gets rid of the possibility of that cable hanging up in brush.

On the other hand the Orx is priced a little high compared to the other gold prospecting competition. This is not a problem per se as long as you get all the features you need or want. However, if it was I and I wanted to make this detector to compete as a gold prospector I would have made sure the Orx could lay claim to being at least as good at gold prospecting as the Deus and it would be best if the Orx actually could be said to be the better gold prospecting option compared to the Deus at least.

Yet when you dig in it seems XP limited not just the coin hunting features but also some prospecting features. The big standout is no ground tracking on the Orx. Now I am not a huge fan of ground tracking but when you need it you tend to really need it, and for XP to leave tracking off the Orx when it is included on the Deus seems like a particularly poor choice since this is a detector intended for dealing with extreme ground conditions. Tracking comes at a cost normally, but it can be a huge aid in highly variable ground. I can live without it, but given the cost of the Orx as compared to the competition this feature should be included.

The other items I am not sure of is ferrous handling. The ferrous tone break appears to be preset and not adjustable on the Orx though you can change the pitch of the ferrous tone. Instead of an adjustable tone break XP appears to be relying more on the iron probability meter for making decisions regarding whether to dig ferrous or not. I may be missing something but I don't think at this time that you get to choose where the dividing line is on what reports audibly as ferrous and what reports audibly as non-ferrous. Consider the jury out here on this question until more information is found. Most people don't care about it anyway, and it may that the Orx reliance on adjusting the IAR (Iron Amplitude Rejection) serves well enough that adjusting the breakpoint is not required.

I am not really making any determinations here but I am just trying to lay out some details in hope it will help people make their own decisions. I have plenty of detectors that will detect small gold as well as the Deus or Orx so for me personally the thing that keeps me coming back to the XP machines is the crazy compact and lightweight design. Yet in looking over the features and price I personally lean more towards the Deus instead of the Orx. It seems to me XP is being stingy with features given the price and for just a little more money a Deus can eliminate questions about whether those features would be missed or not. If I had to buy right now I would be more inclined to get a Deus with 9" X35 coil. The top end frequency there of 27 kHz should do just fine on small gold and I would get features missing in the Orx. If I really needed extra high frequency hots I could add a high frequency coil as an option later.

More to the point, XP is saying this is a lower price option to the Deus. Technically that is true of most Deus models, but as of V5 XP has added enough capability to the WS4 module that the $799 Deus Starter Package actually offers the Orx competition at an even lower price. In that regard XP sort of shot themselves in the foot by upgrading the WS4.

Anyway, that's just a few thoughts from me on the Orx versus the Deus. I won't even attempt to get into the Orx versus all the competition other than to offer this chart below giving a big picture comparison. Given that the Orx is aimed at gold prospectors, and given how there is almost no mention of the detector on the prospecting forums I am very curious to hear people's thoughts on this model. Is XP doing the right thing here for prospectors? Or is it a swing and miss? Opinions?

XP ORX Information Page

XP ORX User Guide

Over 30 khz (LF) gold prospecting metal detectors 1/2019
chart-gold-nugget-metal-detectors-compared.jpg

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the accessory list I mentioned above, plus the Factory Program list and specifications details. Click for larger views.

xp-orx-factory-programs-chart.jpg
XP ORX Factory Programs Chart

xp-orx-accessory-list.jpg
XP ORX Accessory List

xp-orx-specification-list.jpg
XP ORX Detailed Specifications

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

More to the point, XP is saying this is a lower price option to the Deus. Technically that is true of most Deus models, but as of V5 XP has added enough capability to the WS4 module that the $799 Deus Starter Package actually offers the Orx competition at an even lower price. In that regard XP sort of shot themselves in the foot by upgrading the WS4.

That is pretty much my thinking.  I sold my XP last year but I had both HF coils and spent a fair amount of time using it as a gold detector.  My biggest complaint was I really wished it could have had a smaller elliptical coil option.  If the ORX was $200 cheaper I might be tempted to purchase one.  But even at that price it would probably be third on my list of possibilities.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, aufarmer said:

My biggest complaint was I really wished it could have had a smaller elliptical coil option.

That is an excellent point. Usually a hot VLF is for people after tiny gold, and not only are small coils a little hotter, but they fit into tight areas and actually get closer to the gold. Using my list above here are the smallest coils sizes for each model:

Nokta/Makro Gold Racer = 4" x 7.5" DD

White's Goldmaster 24K = 6" round concentric

Fisher Gold Bug 2 = 3.5" x 6.5" concentric

White's GMT = 4" x 6" DD

Nokta/Makro Gold Kruzer = 4" x 7.5" DD

Minelab Gold Monster 1000 = 5" round DD

Nokta AU Gold Finder = 4" x 7.5" DD

XP ORX = 5.5" x 9.5" DD

Optional coil pricing is also a factor. Any spare coil for the ORX will run around $400 while the other detectors feature "dumb coils" that sell for $150 - $250

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First time I ever saw gold prospectors stuck for a lack of words. I guess the lack of response is a response however. Not a mention of this machine on any of the other gold prospecting forums. If XP intends to sell this to gold prospectors they have some work to do it appears.

World Bored With High Frequency Detectors?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

I guess the lack of response is a response however.

That’s a good point. 

Not all, but many on here, have got themselves an Equinox in whatever configuration. 

5 seperate frequencies and Multi IQ across 3 different sized coils - so many options in 1 unit.  

Unfortunately for other manufacturers I’m barely even reading the specs of new VLFs. 

I dare say many others are the same. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to mention that the EQ 800 was missing Steve from your list of over 30khz gold prospecting detectors. Northeast twisted my "arm" in now saying it. We really are very spoilt now for choices in the high frequency gold detector market & hence, is the world bored with high frequency detectors?

On another note. I went out for my first detect of 2019 yesterday, our saturday. It was stinkin hot, the grass was long but drying out, but still a pain for getting the coil down close to the ground. I took my main machine....the mighty Zed & the EQ 800, GB2 & the Gold Monster. I kid myself thinking I will give each high frequency VLF its own little turn. Trouble is once I grab one of them I just tend to stick with that one. Reason being.....I find them all so close in performance.....more so that when I am mainly using the mighty Zed the VLF's are just my pinpointers. Yesterday when I grabbed a VLF to pinpoint a Zed target I chose the GB2. Mainly because it was the only VLF that had the coil cable connected to the control box & it was just a matter of turning it on & I was in business straight away. It then dawned on me that the GB2 is instantly going as soon as you turn the on/off volume knob on. You don't have to wait for it to wined up like you do with the GM or the EQ 800. I know it is only a second or two & something pretty trivial but despite technology & these latest high frequency VLF's of today, I still find myself drawn to the GB2. I find it so simple & deadly & I love its bulletproof little coil & no nonsense controls. Like I said earlier, I find them all so close in performance that it really doesn't seem to matter which one I use.

My last detect of 2018 & l used the EQ 800 with 6" coil as my pinpointer for a Zed dig & it did the same job just as well as the GM & GB2 would have. In fact once I had it in my hands I went for a bit of a wander & found numerous small bits of gold with it. I didn't end up doing that post but will now.

Sorry to digress from your original thread. I know I can be a bastard for doing that but I get on a roll & away I go. Someone mentioned the world being bored with high frequency detectors :biggrin: & I jumped on that bandwagon with how spoilt we are for choice & how close they all are in performance. I will bugger off now.

Good luck out there

JW :smile:

PS: I found three small bits yesterday. Better than starting the year with a skunk. ?

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Equinox is not marketed and sold primarily as a gold prospecting detector which is why I did not include it on the chart.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Steve Herschbach said:

The Equinox is not marketed and sold primarily as a gold prospecting detector which is why I did not include it on the chart.

Yes....I thought that would be the case & fair enough. ?

I can't believe you sold your Zed....& now Northeast as well. What have you started? :laugh: Of course you will have your valid reasons. I won't be selling mine anytime soon. 

JW :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

XP ORX Testing Australia Comparision between the ORX and Gold Bug 2

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Chase Goldman
      Long time Deus user, but I am pretty convinced XP did something to juice Gold Mode on Orx vs. Deus' Gold Field  and it is my preferred mode for relic hunting, recently.  I like the 9" HF coil and hunt at 14 or 30 khz, typically.  Have not had problems hitting all kinds of silver, brass, and lead in moderately to high mineralized soil at various depths and junk target densities.  The one touch instant GB grab and pop up TID and Iron Probability meters enhance the user interface over Deus too.  ORX finds over the last couple months pictured below:

    • By Steve Herschbach
      XP DEUS / XP ORX Search Coil Chart
      Low Frequency (LF) Search Coils 4, 8, 12, 18 kHz 9" round, 11" round, 13" x 11" (discontinued September 2018) XP DEUS Only
      X35 Search Coils 4, 8 ,12 ,18, 25 kHz 9" round, 11" round, 13" x 11" XP DEUS and XP ORX
      High Frequency (HF) Search Coils 9" round 15, 30, 50 kHz and 10" x 5" 15, 30, 80 kHz XP DEUS and XP ORX
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Has anybody used both or have any opinions on which coil offers the most useful overall frequency range? With the X35 you have 4, 8, 12, 16, and 26 kHz and with the round HF coil you have 15, 30, and 55 kHz.
      It seems to me the X35 26 kHz is sufficient for most nugget detecting while offering frequencies as low as 4 kHz. I guess another way of asking would be has anyone really found the 55 kHz or 74 kHz settings to be that much better than the 30 kHz setting on the HF coils?
      I’m just speculating that for the die hard nugget hunter the HF coils make sense but with the ORX X35 wired headphone combo available for as low as $649 it might actually be the better option for the multi-use detectorist.

      XP ORX with 9" round HF coil or 9" round X35 coil options

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Getting to know your metaldetector and its features can be very demanding. This video explains how to quickly adapt the XP ORX Gold program for inland use along with other metal detecting top tips.
       
    • By Chase Goldman
      I was invited back to one of my favorite relic sites in Pennsylvania for a couple of visits, recently.  Not only is the site productive but you also never know what just might turn up there.  There have been plates and buttons galore, minie and round balls of various types and calibers, other brass uniform and equipment accouterments, jewelry, and other relics .  Not to mention silver and gold coins from the 1700's to the 20th century, including a couple of large coin caches.  This site appears to have been a CW picket post and/or bivouac area.  It also appears to be a center of commerce based on the number of early 19th century coinage encountered. 
      I have had success with both the Equinox and my Deus.  This site, unsurprisingly, is becoming more and more stingy and I have found that I am just more confident with the Deus here, lately, for some reason.  Can't explain it from a detector performance standpoint, because the Equinox has killed it here before.  The Deus in gold field or with pitch tones in discrimination mode just seems to give me a better "view" of the ground and with lots of junk iron, hot rocks, modern trash, and aluminum slag from a previous tractor engine explosion I need the instant feedback the signal modulate gives in terms of signal strength and target footprint.  The Equinox lacks this "feel" with its relatively un-modulated tones and requires the extra step of shifting into pinpoint mode to trace a target footprint to sift through large iron targets and large chunks of slag or aluminum cans.  The Equinox can obviously get it done here, but I am going with the hot hand, and that is XP for now..
      On my second trip there this fall, I focused on using my ORX exclusively, which I got as a backup to the Deus and really wanted to see if it could hold its own with the Deus despite some of it's feature limitations vs. the Deus.  The ORX has four built in programs vs. the 11 that are built into the Deus, though many of the Deus programs are just variations on the same theme with different settings pre-programmed in.  The Deus and ORX basically have just two modes.  Discrimination mode and Gold Field(Deus)/Gold (ORX) mode.  The gold mode on Deus/ORX are essentially identical in terms of settings.  Gold mode emulates an all metal setup with VCO pitch based audio that changes in intensity and pitch depending on the strength of the target signal - a visual target ID is used for dig decisions.  Gold Field/Gold mode allows you to set a threshold tone and allows you vary recovery speed (reactivity) and you can cut in some limited iron audio reject which tends to break up the audio signal in the presence of iron.  I usually just keep it off because in mineralized soil, everything gets broken up so it is pretty useless.  You can use target ID to determine probable iron and the ORX has a useful "iron probablity" bargraph and pop up, large font target ID display which is absent on the Deus.  A couple of ORX user interface enhancements I would like to see in a future Deus implementation.  The discrimination or "coin modes" as they are called on the ORX are more traditional iron discrimiantion based tone and visual ID modes.  On ORX the tones are fixed at 3 tones (one of those being iron audio which can be switched on even when using discrimiantion, similar to the Deus).  The Deus meanwhile, has a myriad of tone customization options (1, 2, 3, 5, and full tones) with fully customizable breakpoints and tone pitch selections.  The Deus also provides more adjustability on recovery speed and related filters such as the silencer which is sort of like iron bias on the Equinox.  Other than those differences, the ORX raw performance is basically identical to the Deus.  I decided to put that to the test and the results were not really surprising.  It delivered.  What did surprise me was how much I liked using it vs. the Deus.  Yes it has limitations on settings but for 90% of the situations I would encounter, it would hold its own just fine. 
      Below are some of the finds recovered recently at the site.  Deus finds are mostly to the left, ORX finds are mostly to the right including the Mexican 1850 1/2 Reale.  How it found it's way all the way to PA only to be lost for perhaps 150+ years, is a great mystery to be pondered.  In addition to the coin, ,various Eagle buttons and button backs, a few flat buttons, a fancy gold plated button with dimpled design, a sword hanger clip, a very old religious cross pendant, period lead bullets, and some miscellaneous pieces of brass and lead were recovered.
      I can see myself keeping the ORX in the truck as my general purpose grab and go machine for moment's notice detecting.  Enjoy.







    • By RobNC
      Ok.. I've encountered some really tough ground conditions in a lot of areas that I hunt regularly. We are talking the red dirt with little shiny particles all in it that also has iron mixed in.  My Teknetics T2 struggles in it. My ORX struggles but will fish things out if you can stand the machine gun blips. I keep reading that the Equinox is more suited to deal with this. Now, I tried an Equinox 600 and found it to also cut up on certain plots of land, and the particular one I had was really horrible in iron. The tones also played tricks on my ears and I found the bleepity bling like sounds to confuse my caveman brain. The ORX has been a decent detector for me, and helped me rehabilitate myself after a car accident this year. However the tones in it are so close together that my ears can not often discriminate high from mid tone. There is no way to adjust it.
      Let's fast forward to today. The Equinox 600 does not have the adjustability of the 800 concerning tones, or at least that is my understanding. I walked away from my Equinox 600 ticked off that I could not seemingly bond with it. In my mind there was a single thought - how much better would the 800 be? For those of you that have especially used the XP ORX or the Teknetics T2 and also used an Equinox 800 I'm asking you, does the Equinox 800 do better in contaminated soil than my current 2? It is possible I will trade the XP ORX towards the EQ800. Would that be a "step-up" in capabilities? I've always found this forum and the people here honest and fair with no BS. So I ask you, would it be worth the extra money, hassle and such to truly give the Equinox 800 a chance even though I had a 600 and it didn't quite suit me. It is entirely possible the 600 I had may have had a fault of some type for all I know. And what of depth with the EQ800 vs the XP ORX?
      Reaching out to everyone in the know.
×
×
  • Create New...