Jump to content

Tejon Audio Wave Forms


kac

Recommended Posts

I did a quick recording of items I had going from a small nickel silver bead through a screw cap. Total of 20 items 6" away in both all metal mode and discrim mode with disc at min.

It is interesting how you can actually see the different sounds and how they have unique patterns. I plan on redoing the test when I can set up outside. There is a lot of emi here and my audio setup was not tuned so I couldn't hear the threshold through the computer even though it was pretty loud on the detector. The audio was also recorded really hot which I will correct next time.

Wonder if digital machines have just flat signals with no variation other than tone and volume? I can't record my Garrett as it has a proprietary audio jack.

 

All Metal Tejon.jpg

Disc min Tejon.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Update on this subject. I did a new recording and it seems sensitivity really doesn't effect depth but rather a bit of detail to the audio itself. It also seems to have stereo output, might explain my last couple hunts I had set my headphones to mono and had some trouble telling targets apart. Thought I just lost my touch.

The Tejon seems to have a fixed gain. With that in mind I set the machine to 10 sensitivity on lowest disc. and recorded the following targets.

medium gold ring, us nickel, square tab, large platinum ring, pull tab, copper penny, silver ring, clad dime, clad quarter, silver half dollar. Targets passed over the coil at approx 6" away and approx same speed.

medium gold ring.jpg

us nickel.jpg

square tab.jpg

large platinum ring.jpg

pull tab.jpg

copper penny.jpg

925 silver ring.jpg

clad dime.jpg

clad quarter.jpg

silver half dollar.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya I saw that. My first post was with the stock concentric and had trouble recording the audio as it was clipping out on me. This was done with the 10x12 widescan.

Did forget to mention my swings over coil where right to left to right (rx to tx then back to rx). You can see how the machine has a different read on either side of the coil, guessing they boost the tx (high output transmitter HOT). I wish it did have a gain control. I'll be running the machine as sensitive as I can instead of the usual 7-10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

May I ask what you used to record the audio and graph it like that? I'm looking to start a little project by making a "target id bible".  Have those images placed in a database or something and then when I'm hunting I could create a program that matches the tones to what I have in the database.  

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tejon has a standard 1/4 jack so i used that with an adapter to the 1/8" jack and plugged it into my computer to the microphone input. Used a free program called Audacity to record the waveforms.

Things that can vary those wave forms can be EMI, ground conditions, distance to target and swing speed so it may or may not be super accurate going from a house to the field. I just did this as a comparison of different objects to each other in the same environment with what ever varialbes that came with it other than distance and swing speed.

Those were also recorded in disc mode and is why the forms are shorter than all metal mode that would be unfiltered.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      The whole depth with single frequency VLF detectors thing in my opinion has been nothing but a red herring for decades. I have read a thousand posts from people wanting VLF detectors with "more depth". Yet VLF detectors maxed out for usable depth by at least 1990 if not before. I have not used any single frequency VLF metal detector since 1990 that got more depth on coins than my old Compass Gold Scanner Pro.

      The only real improvement we have seen and are still seeing is in the ability to find and correctly identify items that are masked by the ground itself or adjacent undesirable targets. There are an amazing number of targets in the ground at depths achievable by any decent detector made in the last 25 years, but that are being missed because they are improperly identified and ignored, or just completely masked and invisible. This is an area where the Minelab BBS and FBS detectors have excelled. They do not go deeper. They simply get more accurate discrimination at depths exceeding what most detectors achieve. Machines like the DEUS and a lot of other Euro machines are excelling not for the depth they get, but this ability to acquire and accurately identify targets at shallower depths that are missed by other detectors.

      If we had a detector that could simply see through everything and accurately identify coins to 10" the ground would light up with countless missed finds. I get a chuckle out of all the deep coins I see people talk about on the forums when the best detectors made can't accurately identify a dime past 5-6 inches in my soil. Anything deeper just gets called ferrous. There is huge room for improvement in metal detectors still not by getting more depth, but by simply finding shallower targets that have been missed by other detectors made up until now.
      How To Make Yourself Crazy!
      U.S. Versus Euro Style Detectors
    • By Tony
      From what I can gather, higher frequency VLF detectors are more suited for smaller gold but ground mineralisation may be something to factor in. Would there be a “better” frequency for nuggets 1 gram and above in heavy ground?
      I’m not too concerned if I miss sub gram nuggets if there is a better suited frequency.
      The old Garrett Groundhog circuitry was legendary in this country…..I think it was around the 15 kHz mark. Is this frequency range a good starting point or do I need to consider other things such as better ground balancing capabilities or Garrett’s extra coil voltage. 
      My Minelab PI units will be mainstay detectors but as mentioned in another post, I have ground littered in man made iron junk and the ground mineralisation is severe. There are plenty of nuggets in the 1 gram to 5 gram range (maybe bigger) but the iron signals are as dense as 5 per square metre 🤬
       Thanks for any ideas.
       
    • By water spider
      maybe we could have a multi frequency coil, that recieves a single frequency or selectable single frequency and effectively distorts and amplifies the single frequency resulting in frequency variants up and down, mimicking or creating smf
    • By Skullgolddiver
      After the good new I realized when tested a few days ago my machine after It drowned and I've succesfully reanimated It....
      Now the horrible gasket Is fighting to stay out of the housing against any kind of attempt😒.
      So I'm in the middle of a headache manutention session with scarce results.
      That's the Mood guys😑
       

    • By Tnsharpshooter
      See NASA-Tom’s comments
      https://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,181189
    • By Tnsharpshooter
      Don’t know any other better subforum to place this.
      When manufacturers design make sure platform can allow at least 2 software versions or at the very least allow what I call both newer version update (whole) and a older subset (portion of older version) to be used.  
      Why?
      Makes testing easier if and when a newer version is designed and requires pre release testing in the field for validation.   Would allow users after version release to use different versions and gain first hand feedback of the benefits or lack thereof of different versions or version subset(s).  Case in point.  Notice Minelab left old iron bias to be user selected when they released newer version with iron bias F2 option.  
      So in a nutshell this allows the detector versions ( or version subset) to be compared to the themselves in the field by the user.
      Xp should have done this too.  They should have designed Deus imo where at least  2 complete version allowed to be uploaded to unit.
      Notice the later released Ace Apex.  Garrett should have allowed on it too.  
      Don’t know what added production cost this would cause.  Hopefully not much.
       
×
×
  • Create New...