Jump to content
mn90403

Care To Share Your 7000 Settings?

Recommended Posts

We've all had our 7000s for a few years now.  Much of the time we keep the same settings.  I'm going back to areas where I've used my 7000 and other detectors and not finding the small gold or the deep gold that I see some of my friends finding.  I haven't asked them recently about all of their settings.  I'll ask the general question now.  There is no RIGHT answer.  Maybe we all can learn something that will let us find a few more nuggets in our worked out patches.

During my most recent gold trip I set up my 7000 like this:

HY, Normal, Sen 8-14, Volume 8, TH 26, TH Pitch 53, Volume Limit 13, Audio Smoothing varied, GB Manual, Ground Smoothing Off or Find Patch, BZ Booster

Using these settings I've found 15-50g meteorites at 8 inches but no gold (maybe I didn't get over it).  Hot rocks were manageable and few.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MN sounds good to me, not too far from the default, only thing I have diff is I have found semi-autos the go so far and despite all the rhetoric forget about the quick GB button, just leave alone, none of that crazy daily even hourly quick GB let the Z have its head. Its not stupid and doesn`t need huuuuuman continual interference.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thread Mitchell. 

Well the Z is gone but I still remember the settings  ?

The changes I made were very much due to JP's information he posted on here.  I genuinely credit JP with my 3 largest pieces of gold - 6gm, 9 gm and 11 gm pieces.  Not monsters but they made me happy.  

Why do I credit him with that?   Because he suggested Difficult/General for the medium sized bits at a bit of depth.   I'd not felt comfortable with Difficult/High Yield as it just seemed to lose sensitivity.  There were small pieces that just didn't make any noise in Diff/HY and I tried to stay in Normal/HY but that is hard in my ground with hot ground and hot rocks.  

So when he suggested Difficult/General I gave it a go over a little spot a mate and I had found a couple of real tiddlers and we had gone over it pretty well.  But, it was also a spot that I knew had seen multiple over ounce pieces found - including a 6 ounce piece.  Difficult/General turned up the 11 grammer first.   I was playing with targets before I dug them with Difficult/High Yield - not a peep out of this one.  Or the 6 gram. ?

Long story short, I continued to use the Difficult/General combo.  Found that it targeted the larger targets better, gave up very little on the smaller pieces and handled the hot ground/rocks easily.  

Ground Type - Difficult.

Gold Mode - General.

Threshold - 27

Volume - 1 (once I had a B&Z booster)

Volume Limit - 8 (B&Z booster)

Audio smoothing - Off

Ground Balance - Semi Auto

Sensitivity - as high as possible but with stable threshold

That's my basics.  

 

However, when cleaning out areas with little bits.  High yield and a really high sensitivity would ping the tiny bits.  I don't think you could stand the unstable threshold all the time and the noise probable hid some pieces but for the most part the little bits 'lit up'.  With these settings I really think the Z was finding bits equally small as the SDC can.  Was continually amazed by the small size the Z could hit.  

Sorry if I've rambled a bit.  Might be feeling a bit nostalgic about the Z  ?

 

 

 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, klunker said:

No settings will eliminate the need for careful operation of the detector and intense concentration.

KL, that`s got to be closest to the truest setting that applies to everyone and every detector. Most settings are individual but that settings universal.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems over the next month or so before my trip I should be using General.  I'll have to make a couple of trips with that in mind.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As hot as possible for the conditions while still staying stable. No need to memorize settings really, just the philosophy. Adjust accordingly as you travel. 

For most of the US West not right next to EMI/civilization and not on basalt or serpentine, BIF, (or similarly hot or pyrite/magnetite/galena/etc laden bedrock) I've been able to run HY, Normal, and 18-20 sens. I keep my threshold lower than most though because sensory adaptation is real and affects us non-computer humans more than some might think.

When it comes to 1 grain to 1 gram stuff, General will miss a lot that HY will hit like a bell.

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jasong

that is why taking a break or changing the tone or volume can make a difference for the better...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just sometimes sit back and think of I'm missing some deeper targets because of what settings I don't run. I 99% of the time run....

High Yield

Difficult

Sensitivity 16 or so

Low smoothing

Semi Auto GB

I just like a quiet machine. Maybe I need to break out of my comfort zone ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't use 1 set of Settings as the sites,, soil moisture and size of gold I am chasing are usually changing.  But to help those who hunt Rye Patch and areas like it, these settings might help.  Please realize they are just a guide and if you meet me out there, I could be running something different.

The photos are the last time I hunted RP for 5 days straight.  Total of 34+ grams with a couple nice chevrons.

These settings I use most of (not all) the time at Rye Patch and in areas with little mineralized soil and the ground is dry.

Gold Mode: High Yield for best depth on nuggets up to an ounce.  Also great for Specimens and Meteorites. 

 

Ground Type: Normal for most ground. If the ground is extremely noisy or you are new to detecting, then try Difficult as it runs much smoother.

 

Sensitivity: Depending on soil conditions and sound of machine, but I like 9 & 10.

 

Volume: 8

 

Threshold Level: 38 to 40 depending on your hearing and headphones.

 

Threshold Pitch: Personal preference but I use 53

 

Volume Limit: 12

 

Audio Smoothing: Low or sometimes OFF if you are familiar with old GP's.

 

Ground Balance Mode: Auto

Hope this helps.

Gerry's Detectors
Gold Detector Field Training

 

www.gerrysdetectors.com

RP1118A.JPG

RP1118b.JPG

RP1118C.JPG

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By phrunt
      I always wondered if there was even gold around where the X-coil manufacturer lives, I didn't know much about Russian gold or if Russia even had much gold.
      Here is a video broken into parts of the Russian manufacturer showing the different capabilities of the 17x12" X-Coil between the Standard GPZ14” Minelab coil being used near high voltage power lines in Russia.
      It's good to see he is a prospector.
      Sorry about the quality of some of the parts. 
      It's a deep hole he has to dig to get it, nice soft soil though... that'd make life easier than using a jackhammer 🙂
       
    • By Emmanuel
      Hello fellow prospectors,
      I recently acquired a Minelab GPZ 7000 and I am looking for a fellow prospector wanting to search for gold with me in Southern California. As a former FBI agent, I have learned it is better to have two people when exploring unknown places... I have been using a Minelab CTX 3030 and I am ready for something new i.e. gold prospecting. I live in Long Beach but  I also have a home in the Lake Arrowhead area (San Bernardino County). I believe some areas are worth prospecting in San Bernardino County. Having said that, I am willing to travel. Reach out if you are interested. ads4350@gmail.com
    • By jasong
      I was going to post this in one of the X Coil threads, but it might be of interest to everyone.
      I bought a replacement ferrite ring since I left my ML ferrite in Arizona. It's one of the Doc's ferrites with the white backside (off Ebay), I did not realize they were not ML ferrites when I bought it. The OEM Minelab ferrites have a black backside.
      It would not balance on the X Coils at all and actually sounded like a screaming target (I didn't try the Z14) so I reported that to the coil manufacturer. He responded that the white backed aftermarket rings are not the same as the ML rings. So, as I normally do, I checked for myself, bought an authentic ML ring, and he was right.
      They are the same size, but the Doc's ring is 10 grams heavier (something I noticed immediately but did not have a ML ring to compare to until recently). It is also more magnetic. The Doc's ring is also conductive whereas the ML ring is non-conductive - the Doc's ring was reading about 38 ohms from side to side whereas the ML ring read infinity. And after I sanded the backs to get a fresh surface to check resistances on I noticed the ML ring looks dull and black as a ferrite should, but the Doc's ring looks shiny and metallic, like iron.
      So, clearly there are differences between the two rings. Thought people might like to know even if you are just using the stock coil, as I'm not sure how this affects the ground balance, but someone could be running suboptimally using this ring.

    • By Jin
      I often see others using a high sensitivity setting of 16 - 20 on the 7000. Is there really much of an advantage doing this? I used to think maxing out my 4500 gave me some kind of advantage over the poor suckers who ran factory presets or slightly higher, now im not so convinced. 
      Today i tested out my new 10" and 20" X-coils and tried many different combinations of settings to see what would suite me best. I did most of my testing with the 20" coil on a 2 gram bit of gold. I dug a skinny trench 200mm (nearly 8 inches) in some reasonably hot ground and placed my 2 gram bit in the bottom. High yield/Difficult were the better settings. (Ferrite and ground balanced, Semi auto ground balance,  Ground/audio smoothing off,  volume 8 (using a booster),  threshold 27,  threshold pitch 63,  volume limit 7)
      First i tried a high sensitivity and the target signal popped out nice and loud. Then I started detecting the surrounding area and felt there was so much other ground noises going on that the quieter signals may be masked. Eventually I found my sweet spot where the detector was quiet as a mouse and i had no problems hearing a slight change in the threshold no matter how small it was. This was at a sensitivity of only 3.
      I then went back over the 2 gram bit and it still gave a great response using sensitivity of 3 (although slightly less than when the sensitivity was a lot higher).
      When i started detecting and raising the sensitivity up around 6 -8 a lot more ground noise came in. Now im used to ground noise as i used to use my gpx in Normal timings most of the time. But after reading how the zed is a different beast and not to drive it to hard i decided to try less aggressive settings to see if less is infact more. Obviously im new to the zed and have much to learn so will continue trying different things until i get my head around things. 
        
    • By phrunt
      Here is a recent video of a couple of dudes testing out their massive range of Nugget Finder coils against the GPZ 7000 on targets they've dug into the ground in Western Australia's red dirt.  I found it quite an interesting video and shows how close a lot of coils are in performance.
      I notice he doesn't appear to scrub the GPZ on the ground as much as the others, not sure the reason for that, maybe he doesn't want to damage such an expensive coil ?
      By the time he's got to the GPZ all the ground scrubbing has probably made it a shallower target.
    • By Rob Allison
      Hello All,
         Out here in Arizona, USA, it's been very hot and now humid as the Monsoons are right around the corner.  That being said, I have been poking around an old placer location loaded with iron rubbish in search for overlooked gold nuggets.  I have made it a point to start very early, right at day break and hunt until the heat runs me out (typically 4-5 hours).  I was using the Minelab GPZ 7000 and placering a wash bottom down to bedrock like the old-timers would.  I'm lucky every so often to get a nugget here and there wedged in the bedrock cracks/crevices that the old-timers missed or overlooked.  It's always a mystery to wonder what the old-timers really discovered in some of these really rich coarse gold placer areas.  

      I'm not sure of the rules about Youtube videos, but I have attached two of them for your viewing.  Hope some of you that are not able to get out right now can enjoy the adventure with me.
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...