Jump to content
kac

Orx 9" Round Coil Depth Comparison

Recommended Posts

I hit various areas and in the big fields been using the AT Pro with a Nel Big 17x15 coil. Buddy of mine just got the AT MAX with stock coil and goes just as deep as the Pro with the big.

How does the ORX compare to the MAX? Does it have an All Metal Mode? 

I like the idea of something super light and the choice of frequencies as the AT Pro doesn't find really small gold targets with it's low freq.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out some of Calabas Digger's YouTube videos.  He has at least one showing depth test with the 9" found coil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If those were the comparisons posted here they were on the AT Gold with small coil and machines tested at different frequencies so comparison is not useful.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish that I could help you more.  I have the 9" elliptical on my ORX.  Per Calabash the round is a little deeper than the elliptical.  I haven't used the ORX enough yet to give a firm opinion on depth.  My brother did dig a minie ball at 9" with his ORX with the elliptical coil.  On my last hunt I took a tape measure with me and some of the minie balls I dug were around 7 to 8 inches max.  The site has mild soil and nearly no trash.

 The ORX is basically my back-up detector.  I usually switch to it when my arm gives out swinging the equinox.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try to find out more, my guess is it would do a bit better than the AT Pro with stock coil and guessing it could hit a quarter ok at 12" Last year I picked up the 1805 Reale at 14" down with the AT but could barely hear it. Friend of mines MX Sport hit it about the same but a little less steady signal but that could have been his settings. I'm torn between getting a MAX and be able to use my coils or go for something really light and easier to poke around the woods with less wires to snag up. Also seeing the ORX has a beach mode it might be a good general purpose machine for me in the North East.

Thanks

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The AT Pro was my primary detector until I got the Equinox and the ORX.  Most of my sites are full of old iron and nails.  On these types of sites I would prefer the equinox or the ORX over the AT. I found that these two machines have much better separation in heavy iron  than the AT.  The recovery speed on the AT is much too slow.  

What type of sites do you hunt?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some old farms, wooded areas that used to be farms and for parks and really heavy trash areas I use my Tejon as it picks up on tiny jewelry really well. Tejon has a relatively slow recovery speed but separation is really nice. Iron an can slag is no issue for it but the smaller concentric coil is a little small in the big open fields.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to have the tejon also with the small coil.

I found my first silver with the ORX today. A 1853 half dime.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you used your ORX in the salt? Curious how well it does. The Tejon is pretty good on damp sand and dry sand but there are areas that is impossible to gb. The AT Pro tends to light up in the 50's in many of the beaches here though does a bit better in the wet with the big coil and better with stock in the dry sand. AT Pro tends to hit if your lucky 8" down in the wet with stock coil and forget about hearing any small targets, smaller than a dime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I haven't been to the beach yet.  The coast is about 3 1/2 hours away.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Chase Goldman
      Long time Deus user, but I am pretty convinced XP did something to juice Gold Mode on Orx vs. Deus' Gold Field  and it is my preferred mode for relic hunting, recently.  I like the 9" HF coil and hunt at 14 or 30 khz, typically.  Have not had problems hitting all kinds of silver, brass, and lead in moderately to high mineralized soil at various depths and junk target densities.  The one touch instant GB grab and pop up TID and Iron Probability meters enhance the user interface over Deus too.  ORX finds over the last couple months pictured below:

    • By Steve Herschbach
      XP DEUS / XP ORX Search Coil Chart
      Low Frequency (LF) Search Coils 4, 8, 12, 18 kHz 9" round, 11" round, 13" x 11" (discontinued September 2018) XP DEUS Only
      X35 Search Coils 4, 8 ,12 ,18, 25 kHz 9" round, 11" round, 13" x 11" XP DEUS and XP ORX
      High Frequency (HF) Search Coils 9" round 15, 30, 50 kHz and 10" x 5" 15, 30, 80 kHz XP DEUS and XP ORX
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Has anybody used both or have any opinions on which coil offers the most useful overall frequency range? With the X35 you have 4, 8, 12, 16, and 26 kHz and with the round HF coil you have 15, 30, and 55 kHz.
      It seems to me the X35 26 kHz is sufficient for most nugget detecting while offering frequencies as low as 4 kHz. I guess another way of asking would be has anyone really found the 55 kHz or 74 kHz settings to be that much better than the 30 kHz setting on the HF coils?
      I’m just speculating that for the die hard nugget hunter the HF coils make sense but with the ORX X35 wired headphone combo available for as low as $649 it might actually be the better option for the multi-use detectorist.

      XP ORX with 9" round HF coil or 9" round X35 coil options

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Getting to know your metaldetector and its features can be very demanding. This video explains how to quickly adapt the XP ORX Gold program for inland use along with other metal detecting top tips.
       
    • By Chase Goldman
      I was invited back to one of my favorite relic sites in Pennsylvania for a couple of visits, recently.  Not only is the site productive but you also never know what just might turn up there.  There have been plates and buttons galore, minie and round balls of various types and calibers, other brass uniform and equipment accouterments, jewelry, and other relics .  Not to mention silver and gold coins from the 1700's to the 20th century, including a couple of large coin caches.  This site appears to have been a CW picket post and/or bivouac area.  It also appears to be a center of commerce based on the number of early 19th century coinage encountered. 
      I have had success with both the Equinox and my Deus.  This site, unsurprisingly, is becoming more and more stingy and I have found that I am just more confident with the Deus here, lately, for some reason.  Can't explain it from a detector performance standpoint, because the Equinox has killed it here before.  The Deus in gold field or with pitch tones in discrimination mode just seems to give me a better "view" of the ground and with lots of junk iron, hot rocks, modern trash, and aluminum slag from a previous tractor engine explosion I need the instant feedback the signal modulate gives in terms of signal strength and target footprint.  The Equinox lacks this "feel" with its relatively un-modulated tones and requires the extra step of shifting into pinpoint mode to trace a target footprint to sift through large iron targets and large chunks of slag or aluminum cans.  The Equinox can obviously get it done here, but I am going with the hot hand, and that is XP for now..
      On my second trip there this fall, I focused on using my ORX exclusively, which I got as a backup to the Deus and really wanted to see if it could hold its own with the Deus despite some of it's feature limitations vs. the Deus.  The ORX has four built in programs vs. the 11 that are built into the Deus, though many of the Deus programs are just variations on the same theme with different settings pre-programmed in.  The Deus and ORX basically have just two modes.  Discrimination mode and Gold Field(Deus)/Gold (ORX) mode.  The gold mode on Deus/ORX are essentially identical in terms of settings.  Gold mode emulates an all metal setup with VCO pitch based audio that changes in intensity and pitch depending on the strength of the target signal - a visual target ID is used for dig decisions.  Gold Field/Gold mode allows you to set a threshold tone and allows you vary recovery speed (reactivity) and you can cut in some limited iron audio reject which tends to break up the audio signal in the presence of iron.  I usually just keep it off because in mineralized soil, everything gets broken up so it is pretty useless.  You can use target ID to determine probable iron and the ORX has a useful "iron probablity" bargraph and pop up, large font target ID display which is absent on the Deus.  A couple of ORX user interface enhancements I would like to see in a future Deus implementation.  The discrimination or "coin modes" as they are called on the ORX are more traditional iron discrimiantion based tone and visual ID modes.  On ORX the tones are fixed at 3 tones (one of those being iron audio which can be switched on even when using discrimiantion, similar to the Deus).  The Deus meanwhile, has a myriad of tone customization options (1, 2, 3, 5, and full tones) with fully customizable breakpoints and tone pitch selections.  The Deus also provides more adjustability on recovery speed and related filters such as the silencer which is sort of like iron bias on the Equinox.  Other than those differences, the ORX raw performance is basically identical to the Deus.  I decided to put that to the test and the results were not really surprising.  It delivered.  What did surprise me was how much I liked using it vs. the Deus.  Yes it has limitations on settings but for 90% of the situations I would encounter, it would hold its own just fine. 
      Below are some of the finds recovered recently at the site.  Deus finds are mostly to the left, ORX finds are mostly to the right including the Mexican 1850 1/2 Reale.  How it found it's way all the way to PA only to be lost for perhaps 150+ years, is a great mystery to be pondered.  In addition to the coin, ,various Eagle buttons and button backs, a few flat buttons, a fancy gold plated button with dimpled design, a sword hanger clip, a very old religious cross pendant, period lead bullets, and some miscellaneous pieces of brass and lead were recovered.
      I can see myself keeping the ORX in the truck as my general purpose grab and go machine for moment's notice detecting.  Enjoy.







    • By RobNC
      Ok.. I've encountered some really tough ground conditions in a lot of areas that I hunt regularly. We are talking the red dirt with little shiny particles all in it that also has iron mixed in.  My Teknetics T2 struggles in it. My ORX struggles but will fish things out if you can stand the machine gun blips. I keep reading that the Equinox is more suited to deal with this. Now, I tried an Equinox 600 and found it to also cut up on certain plots of land, and the particular one I had was really horrible in iron. The tones also played tricks on my ears and I found the bleepity bling like sounds to confuse my caveman brain. The ORX has been a decent detector for me, and helped me rehabilitate myself after a car accident this year. However the tones in it are so close together that my ears can not often discriminate high from mid tone. There is no way to adjust it.
      Let's fast forward to today. The Equinox 600 does not have the adjustability of the 800 concerning tones, or at least that is my understanding. I walked away from my Equinox 600 ticked off that I could not seemingly bond with it. In my mind there was a single thought - how much better would the 800 be? For those of you that have especially used the XP ORX or the Teknetics T2 and also used an Equinox 800 I'm asking you, does the Equinox 800 do better in contaminated soil than my current 2? It is possible I will trade the XP ORX towards the EQ800. Would that be a "step-up" in capabilities? I've always found this forum and the people here honest and fair with no BS. So I ask you, would it be worth the extra money, hassle and such to truly give the Equinox 800 a chance even though I had a 600 and it didn't quite suit me. It is entirely possible the 600 I had may have had a fault of some type for all I know. And what of depth with the EQ800 vs the XP ORX?
      Reaching out to everyone in the know.
×
×
  • Create New...