Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is there anywhere on this site that has the research or post made from Reg Sniff pertaining to
TDI depth in relation to battery voltage?  I remember somewhere that stated the reason the original TDI had greater depth capabilities was the increased voltage of the batteries not necessarily the model number.  It also had information in relations to voltage limits/performance issues.

Just thought I'd ask.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure this is what you are looking for but there is some great info in it:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is probably a good start - the bottom line was that even 25v. Didn’t increase the depth more than perhaps 10%

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/whitesgoldmaster/tdi-battery-voltage-t870.html

Here’s a quote from “Geo” on the geotech forum

I tried the (first) TDI model at 25V without problem.
Difference at depth was very small so the stantard battery (14.8V) is the best solution.
Of cource i believe that the constructors knows better than uslol.gif

https://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?23030-TDI-SL&highlight=TDI+battery

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Careful reading of some of Carl's writings the original TDI and the SL version use the same board and components.  Same circuit regulation and possible outputs.  He admitted the original TDI was quite a bit more sensitive in terms of depth over the SL version.  The main exception is the amount of current applied to the coil TX circuit.  All things staying the same, the TDI might air test (no EMI) a target at 16" verses the SL version (no EMI) 12".  This difference amounts to 25%, which is more than enough, to pursue improved battery voltage related improvements.

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where did you see 16" verses 12"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is my own observation using the standard 12" dual field coil with a steady threshold hum.

I can squeeze more out of the machines if I can tame the EMI but sometimes that can't be done.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good example of the TDI Pro version.  There might be something wrong with my SL version, but I can't obtain the depth of the PRO version.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply Mark.  I wish I could be more help to you on this subject but to tell the truth target depth was only one of the things I looked for when I picked the TDI SL and I was willing to give up "extreme" depth in order to satisfy the other requirements.  I have seen the posts you are looking for though and if I'm able to find them I'll post for you.  Good luck sir.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/17/2019 at 1:22 PM, Mark Gillespie said:

Is there anywhere on this site that has the research or post made from Reg Sniff pertaining to
TDI depth in relation to battery voltage?

Is this what you're looking for?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GB_Amateur said:

Is this what you're looking for?

 

Thanks, I have one rechargeable battery that has gone bad.  Taking my time and cutting the glue loose I can see the case has the capability of holding different kind of batteries with some modifications.  I"m looking into both the Panasonic and Westinghouse batteries.

It might be of interest, the voltage of a freshly charged battery pack is only 11.5 v that is lower than using new AA batteries in the optional battery pack by quite a bit.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Smithsgold
      River Detecting for Gold Nuggets
      See who gets the Biggest Nugget
      Gold Prospector's Jeff ( Smithsgold ) and Gary ( Two Toes ) Head to the Hills in search of  rare Gold Nuggets.
      Watch and see who gets the most Gold and the Biggest Nugget.
      SG 010
    • By PG-Prospecting
      So there is a used Whites TDI pulsescan detector in my area for sale for $675.  It is not an SL so im guessing its an older version.  Is there any benefits to owning this detector along with a GPX4800?  The price seems good and its close by.  Ive also thought i heard that the older TDI were more powerful.  I also believe it can use most GPX coils correct?  
      I dont really need it but it seems like a great price for a PI detector.  
       
    • By karelian
      I did a coil test some time ago using a Tdi Pro OZ, quite a variety of coils involved. Just a bit of information not wanting it to go to waste.
      The test area was located in the middle of the Golden Triangle in Victoria, Australia. Looking at the images the test site is located on a area that produced large nuggets. Heavily mineralized to give the depth tests some authenticity. Targets were varied as were the coils tested. The Tdi Pro was ground balanced, gain was at 5, conductivity was in ALL, pulse delay was 10. Frequency was set in the middle and the audio was boosted by a Nokia MD-11 external speaker. Only clear repeatable signals were recorded.
      All targets were buried in the ground sideway from a miners hole, so as not disturb the soil on the surface or above the target. Only the 1 grain ingot and one 0.5 gram gold coin were buried from the surface disturbing the ground.
      Not sure how useful this is for Tdi SL users, deduct 10% maybe.. Just gives a sense of what is realistic is this one location at that one time with the Pro with the variety of coils available back then.
      All the best, Karelian



    • By Ridge Runner
      I was just wondering if anyone had used that coil? I have the SPP and I have the large DF plus others but inquiring mind wanted to know about it .
       At a price they asking it would be in my interest to ask here first.
       You may ask do I need it and that answer is no ! I’m like a kid in the candy store are a toy store. I Want !
       Chuck 
    • By Ridge Runner
      I see so many people wanting to up the voltage. I know by doing so also improves sensitivity and overall performance.
       Maybe someone can tell me why didn’t White’s do the same. My thinking is less load on the electronics makes the detector last longer. At the same time the detector will have a better chance of making it through the warranty .
       Here’s another can of worms I’ve opened up.
       Chuck 
    • By pjrough
      Hi! after a year of snorkeling with TDI BH I concluded that I can clearly note the sensitivity goes down ones the voltage of my battery pack goes down.
      Other conclusion was that even at 12.6V the TDI BH is noisy underwater at maximum settings: it reacts to the waves.
      Thus at the moment I really prefer to have just a stabilized battery pack. For my experiment I took a couple of 21700 5aH Li-Ion cells and a dc-dc booster board.
      the plan is to get "one hunt" battery pack.




       
×
×
  • Create New...