Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DeltaDigger

Button Finds With The Orx. Questions About Tones?

Recommended Posts

I found these buttons yesterday with the ORX. Two of the buttons were "D" buttons and one was a "V" button. While I'm glad the ORX hit the targets I'm unsure how I was able to tell if they were digable targets. Granted I don't have a lot of hours with the ORX but I'm having significant problems trying to identify good targets. The target ID numbers seem to be unreliable and the tones seemed to be slurred once you get past the iron tone. I'm not knocking the machine but was hoping for some tips on the "how to" of recognizing the "dig me" targets.

I have the HF Elliptical coil and I'm detecting in fairly trashy areas. Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks for looking!

Any chance XP will push an update that may help with TID and tones?

IMG_0030.JPG

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DeltaDigger said:

I found these buttons yesterday with the ORX. Two of the buttons were "D" buttons and one was a "V" button. While I'm glad the ORX hit the targets I'm unsure how I was able to tell if they were digable targets. Granted I don't have a lot of hours with the ORX but I'm having significant problems trying to identify good targets. The target ID numbers seem to be unreliable and the tones seemed to be slurred once you get past the iron tone. I'm not knocking the machine but was hoping for some tips on the "how to" of recognizing the "dig me" targets.

I have the HF Elliptical coil and I'm detecting in fairly trashy areas. Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks for looking!

Any chance XP will push an update that may help with TID and tones?

IMG_0030.JPG

Alright full disclosure here.  I haven’t run ORX.  I have loads of Deus experiences.  I have read ORX manual and have watched some videos of ORX done by folks.

First off. Ground balance being off in soil other than mild can cause targets to sound not as pure.

Second.  Coin fast and coin deep.  Seems they are using different filters.  You can’t change them while in a mode like Deus (per reactivity setting).

Duller sound sounding targets can be caused by some masking.  ID of nonferrous targets with iron present will skew ID, drive down real low even into iron range.

You need to get a good tuned ear.  Dig, dig and dig on signals not textbook yet not what I call hard iron fault signals.  There is loads of grey area with Deus (and apparently with ORX) as far as reporting nonferrous presence of object under the coilmwhwn sweeping.

Some on top of the ground testing using scenarios where you set booby traps for your ORX May give some clues to its possible behavior tonally in the wild detecting. This is exaclty what I did with Deus.  On top of the ground testing won’t give you all the info you need though.  Be sure to test some mixed (both ferrous and nonferrous) objects.  Like shotgun shells in various orientations, button with steel backs and or steel loops, etc.  Overall buttons are good ones to test too.  Get yourself a magnet and check your test targets, and believe it or not check all your finds made with ORX with magnet.  You may find this both educational and beneficial for future detecting outings with ORX.  You’ll remember how some targets sound when you located in the wild.  And the magnet may tell you some of the whys behind.

See the manual here.  Note top of  page 4. What it says.  

http://www.xpmetaldetectors.com/telechargement/Instruction_manual/ORX_MANUAL_EN.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Tnsharpshooter said:

Alright full disclosure here.  I haven’t run ORX.  I have loads of Deus experiences.  I have read ORX manual and have watched some videos of ORX done by folks.

First off. Ground balance being off in soil other than mild can cause targets to sound not as pure.

Second.  Coin fast and coin deep.  Seems they are using different filters.  You can’t change them while in a mode like Deus (per reactivity setting).

Duller sound sounding targets can be caused by some masking.  ID of nonferrous targets with iron present will skew ID, drive down real low even into iron range.

You need to get a good tuned ear.  Dig, dig and dig on signals not textbook yet not what I call hard iron fault signals.  There is loads of grey area with Deus (and apparently with ORX) as far as reporting nonferrous presence of object under the coilmwhwn sweeping.

Some on top of the ground testing using scenarios where you set booby traps for your ORX May give some clues to its possible behavior tonally in the wild detecting. This is exaclty what I did with Deus.  On top of the ground testing won’t give you all the info you need though.  Be sure to test some mixed (both ferrous and nonferrous) objects.  Like shotgun shells in various orientations, button with steel backs and or steel loops, etc.  Overall buttons are good ones to test too.  Get yourself a magnet and check your test targets, and believe it or not check all your finds made with ORX with magnet.  You may find this both educational and beneficial for future detecting outings with ORX.  You’ll remember how some targets sound when you located in the wild.  And the magnet may tell you some of the whys behind.

See the manual here.  Note top of  page 4. What it says.  

http://www.xpmetaldetectors.com/telechargement/Instruction_manual/ORX_MANUAL_EN.pdf

Thanks Tnsharpshooter. I was in coin deep, and probably should have been in coin fast considering the area was fairly contaminated. In my opinion, It just doesn't have that "dig" me tone that I'm accustomed to hearing. Maybe it's operator error, maybe I'm not use to the tones. I'll follow your advice and keep listening and learning.

Question, does the Deus have that clear "dig" me tones in contaminated spots or does it have the many shades of gray also? Some of my spots are really trashy and I really need to descriminate on what I'm digging. The clean areas are easy to dig all the targets, the trashy spots not so easy.

Edited by DeltaDigger
Correction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DeltaDigger said:

Thanks Tnsharpshooter. I was in coin deep, and probably should have been in coin fast considering the area was fairly contaminated. In my opinion, It just doesn't have that "dig" me tone that I'm accustomed to hearing. Maybe it's operator error, maybe I'm not use to the tones. I'll follow your advice and keep listening and learning.

Question, does the Deus have that clear "dig" me tones in contaminated spots or does it have the many shades of gray also? Some of my spots are really trashy and I really need to descriminate on what I'm digging. The clean areas are easy to dig all the targets, the trashy spots not so easy.

Deus will give many shades of grey while using 2 tones, 3 tones, 4 tones, etc.  and also full tones.  Deus running pitch tones and some disc like say levels 6-8 gives more of a go no go kinda signal.  No grey really.  You can’t run your ORX like Deus though using pitch tones it seems based on manual.

This shades of grey not bad.  Definitley better than giving no recognizable signal at all.  Can be challenging though.  Some folks running Deus.  They may only be digging more textbook sounding targets.  And are I think likely leaving some nice finds buried walking right by.

Would be nice to actually see ORX and Deus compared over a few booby trapped scenarios using same coil to see how similar or how different they really are.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tnsharpshooter said:

Deus will give many shades of grey while using 2 tones, 3 tones, 4 tones, etc.  and also full tones.  Deus running pitch tones and some disc like say levels 6-8 gives more of a go no go kinda signal.  No grey really.  You can’t run your ORX like Deus though using pitch tones it seems based on manual.

This shades of grey not bad.  Definitley better than giving no recognizable signal at all.  Can be challenging though.  Some folks running Deus.  They may only be digging more textbook sounding targets.  And are I think likely leaving some nice finds buried walking right by.

Would be nice to actually see ORX and Deus compared over a few booby trapped scenarios using same coil to see how similar or how different they really are.

I agree with you on the comparison. Use the same coil, same klz, and use the closest program available with both machines. That would be interesting. I'll be back in the field after the weekend and will operate it on coin fast to see if the tones change. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ORX limits on tone ID with just 3 tones is in play here as discussed above.  I could live with that tone limitation if XP saw fit to also provide pitch tone as an option.  Be careful about Coin fast.  Coin fast utilizes an automatic silencer filter which quiets the machine down in thick iron but can also exacerbate non-ferrous masking.  Overall, the signal processing of coin fast vs. coin deep results in quieter overall operation even if you take silencer out of the equation.  If auto silencer is implemented on ORX similar to Deus than it should be turned off at Reactivities 2.5 and above (which is also where you probably want reactivity to be in super thick iron anyway).  I would give high reactivity coin fast a spin at this site.  Also, you might want to experiment with Gold mode.  It can ultimately give you a pitch-like tone deeper than the coin modes but of course no Tone ID (only visual target ID) and takes some getting used to because it also does not use traditional discrimination but instead an iron audio cancel setting that just breaks up signals it thinks are probable ferrous.  Good luck.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Has anybody used both or have any opinions on which coil offers the most useful overall frequency range? With the X35 you have 4, 8, 12, 16, and 26 kHz and with the round HF coil you have 15, 30, and 55 kHz.
      It seems to me the X35 26 kHz is sufficient for most nugget detecting while offering frequencies as low as 4 kHz. I guess another way of asking would be has anyone really found the 55 kHz or 74 kHz settings to be that much better than the 30 kHz setting on the HF coils?
      I’m just speculating that for the die hard nugget hunter the HF coils make sense but with the ORX X35 wired headphone combo available for as low as $649 it might actually be the better option for the multi-use detectorist.

      XP ORX with 9" round HF coil or 9" round X35 coil options

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Getting to know your metaldetector and its features can be very demanding. This video explains how to quickly adapt the XP ORX Gold program for inland use along with other metal detecting top tips.
       
    • By Chase Goldman
      I was invited back to one of my favorite relic sites in Pennsylvania for a couple of visits, recently.  Not only is the site productive but you also never know what just might turn up there.  There have been plates and buttons galore, minie and round balls of various types and calibers, other brass uniform and equipment accouterments, jewelry, and other relics .  Not to mention silver and gold coins from the 1700's to the 20th century, including a couple of large coin caches.  This site appears to have been a CW picket post and/or bivouac area.  It also appears to be a center of commerce based on the number of early 19th century coinage encountered. 
      I have had success with both the Equinox and my Deus.  This site, unsurprisingly, is becoming more and more stingy and I have found that I am just more confident with the Deus here, lately, for some reason.  Can't explain it from a detector performance standpoint, because the Equinox has killed it here before.  The Deus in gold field or with pitch tones in discrimination mode just seems to give me a better "view" of the ground and with lots of junk iron, hot rocks, modern trash, and aluminum slag from a previous tractor engine explosion I need the instant feedback the signal modulate gives in terms of signal strength and target footprint.  The Equinox lacks this "feel" with its relatively un-modulated tones and requires the extra step of shifting into pinpoint mode to trace a target footprint to sift through large iron targets and large chunks of slag or aluminum cans.  The Equinox can obviously get it done here, but I am going with the hot hand, and that is XP for now..
      On my second trip there this fall, I focused on using my ORX exclusively, which I got as a backup to the Deus and really wanted to see if it could hold its own with the Deus despite some of it's feature limitations vs. the Deus.  The ORX has four built in programs vs. the 11 that are built into the Deus, though many of the Deus programs are just variations on the same theme with different settings pre-programmed in.  The Deus and ORX basically have just two modes.  Discrimination mode and Gold Field(Deus)/Gold (ORX) mode.  The gold mode on Deus/ORX are essentially identical in terms of settings.  Gold mode emulates an all metal setup with VCO pitch based audio that changes in intensity and pitch depending on the strength of the target signal - a visual target ID is used for dig decisions.  Gold Field/Gold mode allows you to set a threshold tone and allows you vary recovery speed (reactivity) and you can cut in some limited iron audio reject which tends to break up the audio signal in the presence of iron.  I usually just keep it off because in mineralized soil, everything gets broken up so it is pretty useless.  You can use target ID to determine probable iron and the ORX has a useful "iron probablity" bargraph and pop up, large font target ID display which is absent on the Deus.  A couple of ORX user interface enhancements I would like to see in a future Deus implementation.  The discrimination or "coin modes" as they are called on the ORX are more traditional iron discrimiantion based tone and visual ID modes.  On ORX the tones are fixed at 3 tones (one of those being iron audio which can be switched on even when using discrimiantion, similar to the Deus).  The Deus meanwhile, has a myriad of tone customization options (1, 2, 3, 5, and full tones) with fully customizable breakpoints and tone pitch selections.  The Deus also provides more adjustability on recovery speed and related filters such as the silencer which is sort of like iron bias on the Equinox.  Other than those differences, the ORX raw performance is basically identical to the Deus.  I decided to put that to the test and the results were not really surprising.  It delivered.  What did surprise me was how much I liked using it vs. the Deus.  Yes it has limitations on settings but for 90% of the situations I would encounter, it would hold its own just fine. 
      Below are some of the finds recovered recently at the site.  Deus finds are mostly to the left, ORX finds are mostly to the right including the Mexican 1850 1/2 Reale.  How it found it's way all the way to PA only to be lost for perhaps 150+ years, is a great mystery to be pondered.  In addition to the coin, ,various Eagle buttons and button backs, a few flat buttons, a fancy gold plated button with dimpled design, a sword hanger clip, a very old religious cross pendant, period lead bullets, and some miscellaneous pieces of brass and lead were recovered.
      I can see myself keeping the ORX in the truck as my general purpose grab and go machine for moment's notice detecting.  Enjoy.







    • By RobNC
      Ok.. I've encountered some really tough ground conditions in a lot of areas that I hunt regularly. We are talking the red dirt with little shiny particles all in it that also has iron mixed in.  My Teknetics T2 struggles in it. My ORX struggles but will fish things out if you can stand the machine gun blips. I keep reading that the Equinox is more suited to deal with this. Now, I tried an Equinox 600 and found it to also cut up on certain plots of land, and the particular one I had was really horrible in iron. The tones also played tricks on my ears and I found the bleepity bling like sounds to confuse my caveman brain. The ORX has been a decent detector for me, and helped me rehabilitate myself after a car accident this year. However the tones in it are so close together that my ears can not often discriminate high from mid tone. There is no way to adjust it.
      Let's fast forward to today. The Equinox 600 does not have the adjustability of the 800 concerning tones, or at least that is my understanding. I walked away from my Equinox 600 ticked off that I could not seemingly bond with it. In my mind there was a single thought - how much better would the 800 be? For those of you that have especially used the XP ORX or the Teknetics T2 and also used an Equinox 800 I'm asking you, does the Equinox 800 do better in contaminated soil than my current 2? It is possible I will trade the XP ORX towards the EQ800. Would that be a "step-up" in capabilities? I've always found this forum and the people here honest and fair with no BS. So I ask you, would it be worth the extra money, hassle and such to truly give the Equinox 800 a chance even though I had a 600 and it didn't quite suit me. It is entirely possible the 600 I had may have had a fault of some type for all I know. And what of depth with the EQ800 vs the XP ORX?
      Reaching out to everyone in the know.
    • By Fskafish
      Im looking to buy an orx but, ive noticed the price of them is all over the place, from 899 to 650 i know theres roughly 3 packages or so im looking for the package with the 9 inch hf coil and wireless headphones. Where are you orx owners buying from?
    • By MannyScoot
      Shot a video of a small nugget I found yesterday using the XP ORX in Carefree Arizon...... If anyone is interested : 
       
×
×
  • Create New...