Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest AussieDigs

Which P. I.?

Recommended Posts

Guest AussieDigs

NE, initially for me it was difficult to choose between the high and low frequency VLF so due to our heavily mineralised ground against hence why i went with the 19khz!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive used every single detector mentioned on this thread, for ease of use the 2300 is best. Best value for $$: QED (but more self training is needed to get the best out of it) and the 4500/5000 is of course a great option. For the QED and GPX, use spiral wound coils only, otherwise you're flogging the same depth capabilities of everyone else for the past 10 years. The QED is a killer with the small 9" coiltek elite and any big coil when adjusted to a wider pulse train and coil match.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AussieDigs

Thanks Aureous, great input.

The QED is proving to be a difficult one. The Experienced are divided on this one with a few not liking it. How would the likes of me, a beginner fair? Thats the quandary for me with the QED. Hopefully NE will be able to shed some light after the meetup with Reg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might find it easier than someone that's already used to running a Minelab PI, it seems from what I've read the QED is a decent detector, but it's a learning curve for someone used to the Minelabs.  Once you're so used to something it's hard to change, you've not used to anything....  ?

I doubt the likes of Reg would run a QED if it wasn't good at finding gold.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AussieDigs

I wasn’t suggesting Reg would be anything but straight up.

If experienced operators are having difficulty, it can suggest a beginner like me could have enough difficulty to not warrant the purchase of the QED. It is difficult for someone like me who is new to detecting to make a decision on the QED with so many fors and against. Trying to seperate the ‘wheat’ from the ‘chaff’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it’s worth I think the Minelab GPX 4500 does represent the best “value proposition” going in a prospecting PI at this time. I nominate it as the “Gold Bug Pro” of the PI world, proven safe and reliable, fabulous coil selection, great price.

If it was me I would probably spend the extra on a GPX 5000 just to have the “Fine Gold” setting which the 4500 lacks. That’s a big premium for one setting but “Fine Gold” shuts up hot rocks better than anything I have ever used.

If a person is not going to get into hot rocks severe enough to require the Fine Gold setting then the 4500 is an obvious winner.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AussieDigs

“Gold Bug Pro of the PI world”. 

”fine gold setting” Two detectors in one!

Brilliant Steve. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the QED is more of a task to get running well if you're used to Minelab PI's....if its all green pasture to you, with zero PI experience, the QED will suffice nicely. Get some in field training with Reg or Stinky Pete and you'll find its a great unit at a great price. But get some flat-wound mono coils to run on it, the 9" Elite and 14x9 Evo worked great on mine.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AussieDigs

Having a Gold Bug Pro and researching what the ins and outs of proper setup and use for the last month and beyond should hold me in a better steed for when im ready to purchase the QED and a catchup with Reg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By 2Valen
      I was hunting in my backyard again and had a good sounding tone with a TID of 32 on the display so I started to dig.
      I got down to about 4 inches deep and my carrot was sounding a close target as I dug.
      Carefully sifting through the soil I noticed what looked like the outline of a dime. All that it was, was just an impression of one.
      Once again I searched the hole again with my carrot and the target was no longer there.
      I tried the 800 again and found nothing within 3 feet in all directions of the hole, checked to see if anything stuck to the scoop, on my shoes, on my clothes and found nothing.
      How can a good sounding target with 2 detectors get lost or disappear like that. 
    • By Retired_Hunt_Full_time
      I have been a primary whites user since 1972  I have owned the V3i since its release and love it.  I have been looking at the equinox 800  and the anfibio multi. I was wondering if anyone had compared these two detectors the V3i.  Other multi frequency thoughts?  I have the Minelab Excalibur II 800 for salt water and diving.
      My only wish for the Anfibio multi would be to allow all three or select 2 (not available on the V3i)  
      The Graphics and information from the V3i are still unmatched 
       
    • By Ridge Runner
      White’s you have maybe a month to three months to come out with a new detector line , That’s if you want to keep up with the Jones better known as Minelab and Makro .
       Hope to see the lineup real soon. I know you don’t spend money on flashy videos and beautiful girls and that’s okay with me.
       What I want to see is American made on the housing somewhere and White’s number one detector company again.
       You make it I’ll buy it! ( I’ve been doing it since 1966 )
       Chuck Anders 
    • By oldmancoyote1
      Around here in the Klamaths bedrock is at lest 2 feel down and often much deeper.  Digging through several feet of boulders and cobbles is serious hard work.  Then there is sand sliding in from the sides making progress very slow.  To beat that, I need to set the sides of the hole far apart or I get a hole with a hand-sized bottom continually filled with sand from the sides.  That is a lot of work.  Historically the creek was a huge gold producer.  I see little or no gold in the upper material.  Have I just not found the right spot, or is sluicing here hopeless?  Should I spend more time prospecting for productive material near the surface, or give it up?
    • By nalcomis
      I just received a new to me SDC2300 and wanted to verify it using the Minelab security check on their website. I did not receive the viewer that was originally included with the detector so what worked for me was a coolant leak detector flashlight ( black light or UV light) It works well enough for me to read the hidden code and I was able to verify my machine.

    • By GB_Amateur
      I had a couple lead test targets for calibrating in the field but lost them on my last Western expedition.  This is the main reason I don't use gold test targets!  I'm ready to make a new set.  I'd like to hear your advice on what size and shape of lead I should be using, for both LF and PI detectors.
       
×
×
  • Create New...