Steve Herschbach

23 minutes ago, abenson said:

Yea I probably should have Garrett take a look. Weird thing is it only happens when the headphones are connected to the Axiom. If I don't use headphones there's no issue. Maybe the headphones are the issue. Or maybe I should just by a z-lynk pinpointer.

The headphones are doing some frequency hopping thing so that is probably what is going on. Ironically that feature is billed as preventing interference. I'd check with Garrett for suggestions on how to maybe sequence things properly to fix the issue. I usually don't use headphones or often use wired so that is why I would not encounter it, plus not using a pinpointer with the Axiom a lot I could have just missed the issue the times I do use the wireless headphones.

"Frequency-Hopping Technology—Creates an infinite number of channels to prevent interference with nearby headphones and wireless devices."

“I got it because I wanted more versatility. I sold it because there is too much going on”

So basically he is selling it because it is doing the thing he bought it to do. You don’t get versatility without extra complexity. Last thing I’d be doing is telling a SDC user they need one. The SDC is an excellent and very simple small gold vacuum cleaner. The AlgoForce is lighter costs less etc but I doubt it really would find gold any better. And I’m a bit doubtful of coils larger than 14x9 at most. That 15x12 you’d want a large battery to balance out the weight. Not a coil I'd want on the machine.

A U.S. buyer should grab fast though even with the bum coil. Beat everyone else by months at least.

Bottom line impulse buy try sell has always been and always will be a feature of the detecting world, especially when the price is this attractive. Going to be lots of new detectorists especially pop for these just to discover PI detecting is not for them. Some people might be better off with a Manticore and 5x8 coil.

10 hours ago, abenson said:

Both the GPX 4500 and GPX 6000 have no issues with carrot. My Axion on the other hand does. Relic hunting the other day I did a noise cancel twice with the pinpointer on. Then turn it off until I found the next target. As soon as I turned the pinpointer on the Axiom went nuts again. I finally just started turning the Axiom off while I pinpointed the target in the bottom of the hole. Not a huge deal, but is a little frustrating.

Mine does not do that. What you are basically saying is the pinpointer is changing frequency after being turned off and back on. Or that the Axiom is shifting in frequency while running. Might be worth a query to Garrett.

With all detectors turn whatever pinpointer you have on, put it 3 feet away, do a detector frequency scan, go detecting. Should just be part of your normal startup procedure.

On 8/23/2023 at 5:53 AM, Capphd said:

"The MP is the only existing bridge between PI and IB detectors rivaling PI in many regards and outperforming every IB in existence."

Exactly what Tarsacci claims.

Some Garrett coils come with cover, some do not. None come with bolt or washers as far as I know except ATX coils which include a lower rod assembly.

• Placer Gold Deposits of Utah 1973 USGS Bulletin 1357 by Maureen G. Johnson - A catalog of location, geology, and production with lists of annotated references pertaining to the placer districts.

12 hours ago, Lead Detector said:

It almost seems like I'm the only one with issues with these companies.  And that's not a bad thing. I'm actually glad to hear most people have good experiences with them. If @steve herschbach would like to remove this post, I am fine with that. My issues will work themselves out, and honestly I don't want to hurt any company that does a good job for the majority of their customers.  My issues may be big misunderstandings, along with lack of communication. And I feel wrong for starting this thread.  

You are vastly overestimating the power of a single thread to have any effect for the positive or negative. I’m sorry for the issues you are having, but the reality of this thread is that it will soon lose steam and fade into the background like all the other threads posted here over the last decade. Look at reviews on Amazon, glowing reviews, horrible reviews… the companies in general survive it all just fine. The best companies are like people, they make mistakes, but if they have decent product and decent service overall they will do fine. Nobody bats 100% and in life you don’t have to. Just get it right most of the time. And yes, both Garrett and Nokta are generally noted for their exceptional service, not the other way around. So rest assured and lose no sleep thinking you are somehow going to bring any company down with a single thread. That would take every member posting a litany of issues for a year or two, and other sites reflecting the same. When I look at Amazon reviews I don’t pay attention to single reviews, I look at aggregate results and most of us do the same.

In my experience in the detector world a company that builds product that really makes the finds can crap all over its customers for years anyway and it makes little difference. People will complain, but still be first to line up for their next super duper whiz bang detector. As long as people believe in a companies products they can get away with almost anything in other aspects of the business. If you have the choice between being the company making the best detectors but having the worst service, or being the company that makes the third best detectors but has great service, it’s the first option that will probably get the most sales. Sad but true. This is because for the vast majority of us, detectors need no service. You buy them, they work. Problems overall are far fewer than you’d imagine by looking at the internet. I’d guess based on my own sales experience that less than 1% of detector purchasers overall have any manufacturer related issues at all with their detector.

I can testify for a fact the customer is not always right. The secret is to just do what is right by all involved…. and sometimes that means telling a customer they are full of it. It’s a tough needle to thread at times, no doubt about it.

Well having been a dealer for 35 years if you gave me your money to order a coil that is advertised as having a coil cover I'd have got you the coil cover. And then I'd have beaten it out of the manufacturer on my own, not dump it on you. Or eaten it as I did many times because my customers are my customers, not the manufacturers customers. But if it's advertised on the website as having a cover they would cough it up, I have no doubt of that.

FYI for anyone dealing with Garrett email is not their forte. Call the 800 number and talk to Rusty.

The Impulse was not really sold outside the U.S. so almost nobody in Australia has one. The E1500 is not for sale in the states yet. People here who have an Impulse probably like it for being submersible. The E1500 is not, so other than curiosity not much reason for an Impulse owner to get an E1500. Bottom line I will not be holding my breath for this head to head comparison to happen. I hope it does. My gut feeling is the Impulse probably has more punch on coin and ring size targets, but I have nothing really to base that on other than the fact that the E1500 seems aimed at small target proficiency, small gold nuggets specifically, and the Impulse was specifically designed for ring size targets. I'd expect either to have the edge for what they were designed to do. There in no denying the Impulse will work far better when submerged. 

AlgoForce E1500 Specifications & Manuals

Fisher Impulse AQ Ltd Specifications & Manuals

Machines no matter which ones have different issues at different locations around the world. Insisting that a detector is carte blanche no good because of issues in one locale when users in other locales are just fine makes no sense to me. I consider the GPX 6000 to be a superior unit to the Axiom for most locations but do have places where it’s exactly the opposite, and it’s precisely because the Axiom handles the ground better at those places. Jeff finds that to be true for him where he is at. I ran the Axiom just fine in WA for two weeks at various locations just outside Meekatharra. Another ten days with a crew running multiple Axioms at widely spread locations in Eastern and Southern Oz. All I can say is that you seem to have ground the Axiom or your Axiom in particular does not like. So Garrett may be scratching their heads also over your reports, and rather than just blow you off want to take the time to do proper testing. Or not, maybe like you say they just don’t care, though I find that doubtful. It’s not my job to defend them or Minelab but I am sorry when people have difficulty with any machine. Do consider however that your experience does not speak for all users worldwide. It’s the experience you and your mate are having with your machines on your ground, nothing more and nothing less. I am truly sorry regardless that it is not going the way it should.

I would never worry about powering up a control box without a coil attached. On the other extreme, I would never under any circumstances want to connect or disconnect a coil on a GPZ 7000 if it was powered up, but due to the way you have to half disassemble the detector to do this it is unlikely anyone would. On the other Minelabs Carl is probably right but it is also something I would never do. We are creatures of habit, and developing a habit of being sure a detector of any sort is not powered up when connecting or disconnecting a coil will never cause you grief. You can't say the same the other way around so do please just look at it as good practice. And again...

From the GPX 5000 and earlier manuals:

“Always ensure that the control box is turned off before connecting or disconnecting the coil to avoid damage to the detector's electronics”

1 hour ago, Ndplumr said:

I agree. I fully expect to be waiting for at least a year. Hopefully you, and maybe some other experienced detector operators in the US will be able to get some test units in your hands much sooner and give us some good knowledge of how they do on our soil.

That I do not expect at all. Months maybe, but not a year.

Sadly I think it will be later than sooner. Not only are there FCC issues to take care of, but decisions regarding U.S. pricing, possible dealers, and most importantly, service. Faced with more demand then they can handle right now there is no reason for them to rush any of that. I don't want to be a bummer but I'm afraid people here just need to take a chill pill for now. 

32 minutes ago, dig4gold said:

this detector is no miracle machine despite its cool features.

 

Nobody ever said it was a miracle machine so this is a classic straw man presentation. This whole idea of this needing to outperform the GPX 6000 and GPZ 7000 at one third the price or less was brought up before, and I flat out said no, just go use the GPX 6000 and be happy. Same still applies here. If that is what anyone is looking for then look elsewhere.

New Member Signup - Click Here!      Lost Password - Click Here!

Forum Tips & Tricks     Advanced Search     Tag List/Index

Welcome to the AlgoForce Metal Detector Forum! Anything remotely related to the subject may be posted here. Forums for other subjects may be found here. The main goal here - to inform and educate. Please keep threads and posts on topic. Off topic posts may be moved or deleted without warning.

The main goal of the forum is to share information. If you see something interesting on another forum or anywhere else, please link to it. The only goal here is to inform and anything interesting or informative is not only allowed but desired as long as it is on topic.

While visiting this forum please act as if you are visiting my home. Treat others with decency and respect. Politics is not strictly prohibited but limit it to items of concern such as public meeting notices, comment periods, etc. No detector wars - every detector serves a purpose for somebody. For general editorial purposes this forum is treated as if it is a magazine.

Do not place ads for your detector or equipment for sale here. That is only allowed in the Classifieds and is only for participating members - read the rules.

A note about the Google Ads - I know we all hate ads but they pay for the website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. All I can do is to promise not to go overboard with them.

Special Note To Dealers - Dealers are welcome here, with minimal guidelines. Please read My Policy Regarding Dealers

If you have problems logging in or any other issues while on the forum contact the Forum Staff. Information on other general forum use and features can be found here.

Steve Herschbach

Probably nothing, but on a high power PI you could also blow the front end circuit. Less a worry with the AA 12V units but you can bet an issue with SD/GP/GPX and GPZ high power detectors. Even them you’ll probably get away with it, but why run the risk?

From the GPX 5000 manual:

“Always ensure that the control box is turned off before connecting or disconnecting the coil to avoid damage to the detector's electronics”

5 hours ago, dig4gold said:

I couldn't agree more Steve but that is the difference between doing this for money or doing it as a hobby. I would have at a guess that most hobbies don't make money but are done because the people doing it see it as an escape from their usual daily grind. Food for the soul. Be it fishing, hunting, hiking, skiing etc. A lot of those activities come at quite a high cost. Fishing involves having a boat with all the expenses that go with owning & running a boat. Would be cheaper just to buy the fish from a shop, but it isn't always about just catching a fish. It is the whole journey with some mates & the places you go to. Same with gold detecting. Depends how you look at it why you are really doing it. Gold detecting involves hiking, gets you out doors, you experience the 4 seasons in all its glory & what nature offers in those 4 seasons. The Autumn colours , the spring time blooming of wild flowers, the critters you see etc. Ok, the gold has a value but so to do the other things out there.  Like I said, food for the soul. Not everything is about money for everybody

But I get your point.

D4G

 

I can do all that just hiking and camping. Better probably since I would not be so focused on my detector and the ground. If it was just for the fun and experience you can go detect for copper nuggets. Why don’t people do that? Because no matter what there is a hope, a dream of finding the big one. The other things are icing on the cake - but they are not the cake. I’m betting that if I could give people 100% assurance they had zero chance of finding anything of value, quite a few people here would find other ways to go see a sunset. 

47 minutes ago, GeoBill said:

How do you think the miner John/Razerback folded mono coils would perform? He made some very small ones. I don't remember if it was resolved, but was the "Hi-Q" coil that Whites was selling with the SL after Miner John's place burned, White's attempt at a folded mono?

No way to know without trying them. I’ve never really been a fan of the dual fields or folded mono coil, preferring a straight up mono myself. These coils are attempting to solve issues with edge sensitivity, which is exactly what I like about mono coils. The Hi-Q was just an attempt to sell dual field under a new name as far as I know.

4 hours ago, dig4gold said:

No, but it will with its newer technology find gold missed by other detectors on old patches. Look at the success of the 6000. Most new release gold detectors/coils have that ability to bring old patches back to coughing up a few more bits. Maybe not as big but often lots of smaller stuff. It all adds up. 

D4G

It’s also true that diminishing returns is a real thing. Spending ever more money for ever less gold is not sustainable forever. I did this for profit and made good money at it up until the release of the 7000 and for several years after. Yes, the 6000 kept the number count up, but the weight dropped off dramatically. I finally shut the doors a couple years ago on my small gold mining company business license after turning steady profits since 1979. I simply could not reliably cover expenses anymore, let alone turn a decent profit. The fact is the glory days are over but few want to admit it. I officially entered the ranks of hobbyist detectorist and still enjoy getting out and having a bit of fun looking for gold, but I’m far less motivated now than I was when I was getting 1/4 oz a day minimum. It’s been a couple years since I got more than an ounce in a day, something I used to do regularly.