Jump to content

EL NINO77

Full Member
  • Posts

    1,314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by EL NINO77

  1. I'm posting a video from my colleague Prymek... where he shows really well the technical possibilities of the 1 frequency X-Terra Pro compared to the multi-frequency in the Equinox 900 detector...

    The terrain is mineralized with magnetite..., that's why in X terra for ..even low-conductivity targets at 15 and 18 cm in the terrain ..they give a relatively high VDI in the zone of high-conductivity targets..., but there is also a visible difference in the work of the detectors if cover the target with a piece of ceramic...

    in easy terrain, and free weekend detection..these differences between the two detectors may not be that big,,,but when you go into difficult terrain conditions,,,you start to see the difference in the work of both detectors,,,

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. In my opinion, the Nel hunter is closer to the 11" DD Fisher, and if you want a more significant change, I would go for the 13" DD Ultimate... because of that, I have a good ratio between the size and weight of the coil for its size..

    Nel Super Fly 11x 12" can also be a good coil because it is light for its size..but I have no experience with it...

      13" ultimate has been on the market for years, and it's a really proven coil, I have it on several of my detectors...

    • Like 5
  3. 16 hours ago, GB_Amateur said:

    Although this post is inspired by old coin detecting, in many ways it applies to jewelry, native gold, and relics as well so I'm putting it in the general forum.

    Actually there are (at least) two more qualities that enter this topic, so let's define what I mean by each:

    1) Rarity is simply an extreme shortage of supply.  In general usage the word covers a wide range but it can be quantified.  (That happens in some areas of collecting, including coin collecting.)

    2) Value is another general term but in this discussion it's limited to monetary value.  That is also quantifiable.

    3) Aesthetics is the appreciation of something for its (subjective) appeal, typically for beauty.  It's non-quantifiable and reasonably explained by the saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

    4) Sentiment applies to things with personal, particularly emotional attachment.

     

    ....I think that the dream and target of every detectorist is to find and detect a coin or object that would include all 4 mentioned properties... Rarity, Value, Aesthetics, and Sentiment...

    In my opinion, it's a perfect find.... have I found something like this? maybe yes...

    it certainly moved me to achieve other challenging finds in the future.....

    However, the practice is that some of the findings can have only 1, 2 or 3 of the 4 listed value attributes...

    Every detectorist has his own scale or level of findings that he would like to find, and that is often the case, that another good finding... can move us further... in detection...
     
    The value of a coin depends on many factors, and it is often true that the age of the coin itself and the number of mintages do not always determine the relatively greatest value of the object..because marketing around the value of different coins is a special thing and is often subject to various temporal and other changes. and sometimes it is very relative...

      I think that in this hobby...-detection, it's a good thing that you have a chance to find something nice as well as valuable...

      Sometimes it can also be time well spent in good detection..

    ...

    • Like 4
  4. In the Goldfield program, you do not need a silencer,, because this program uses discrimination of the IAR type,,, and when this program is intended for searching for gold, you do not need other types of discrimination..

    ORX vs Deus1 ... according to the experience of my colleague, ORX in the gold program can handle mineralized terrain a little better than Deus1 in the Goldfield program...
    Let's not forget that the ORX electronics are somewhat newer and have been optimized for *Hf white coils... so that may have its reasons...

    • Like 2
  5. The ratio of Performance, Possibilities and Price will be important...,,but the most important thing is that Garret goes ahead ... this shows that he really thinks important about the production of detectors...

    • Like 3
  6. Jeff I think you did well to post your in depth tests of *AXIOM, and GPX and Deus2/Manticore...

    I believe that all the participants of the discussion would get the same results of the test...if they were done in your field conditions....

    Different terrains bring different deep results and that's a fact... that cannot be refuted...

    on the contrary, even in easy terrain, you can come across a place of old settlement, civilization .... where a lot of ceramics, coal, and remnants of iron corrosion can extremely,, change and greatly reduce the detection conditions... for VLF detectors...

    this is an area that I am very interested in..., because there detectors can still find targets that are masked by such mineralization of the terrain....

    I think that a significant feature of PI detectors is the ability to work effectively even on ethereally mineralized terrain, where VLf detectors lose strength and advantages as well as stability of detection...

    there are simply situations where the PI detector will always be the best....

    comparing PI detectors and VLF detectors is like comparing apples and pears...it's never the same....

    as the owner of a PI ATX in which I see a strong detection potential... I'm very glad... that Garret made an Axiom that performed very well in tests... and competes with PI Minelab detectors... and in my opinion it can be even better than slightly larger coils will be available for him.../14-18"/..

    And VLF detectors? ...of course it doesn't matter, they are constantly improving "so that they work well even in more demanding mineralization conditions...and that is also a good thing..

    A good thing for all of us...who like detection...

    as for the range of the detectors for a 5-gram coin... in the near future, I will be able to make some comparisons on such targets on different mineralized terrains... since we now have several different mineralized...test fields...

     

    IMG_20221107_011412.jpg

    • Like 5
  7. I'll say it this way that detectors can definitely be a certain benchmark for the possibility of detection in mineralization.. and thus also an indicator of the limit of detection in such a difficult environment..

    The detection possibilities of various detectors can only be assessed by those who in their environment are able to compare several of the best mineralization detectors side by side...on their mineralized terrain...in tests...but also in practical detection...

      Fortunately, the development of the electronics of VLF detectors,..as well as the development of their software is moving forward..and the deep possibilities in extra mineralization continue to improve.
    and I'm glad to be a part of it...

    Rick... will be interesting to watch the Nexus MP V3 ..with CC 24 khz coils how it does on gold in such conditions...

     

     

  8. I saw on YT how someone removed the chip from the Vanquish coil, modified the chip and connected the coil to the Equinox...
    coil worked..
      Then I was even so interested that I bought another small V8 coil for the Vanquih... for a similar modification...

    In the end, I did not proceed with the modification of this coil... because I had other priorities...

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. 53 minutes ago, Skull diver said:

    @JCR @EL NINO77

    This is what happened today.

    I started the session with D2 in a promising area.

    About two hours and two medium-sized rings (both under 5 grams).

    Tool change and back in the water with the Excalibur.

    After two minutes I dig out the third snake-shaped ring, perhaps the thinnest and lightest of the three.

    This is overwhelming evidence that a screen and an ID, can make a difference if they respond correctly to the object, but as long as you dig outside the range of interest, you lose useful time for other targets.

    I fear I will soon have to fall back on yet another detector and the choice is really narrow.

    IMG_20240212_165517.jpg

    If you are in the right place, a digital detector with a good range can very easily beat ... an analog or digital detector without VDI display...

    I have been dealing with this topic for several years, also because I prefer to use digital detectors from VDI Identifications.

    First of all.. it is a very selective detection where we want to detect the correct targets in one place... and at the same time dig up a minimal amount of non-ferrous waste...

    I always take this feature into consideration with every detector I use...


      Skull Diver,,congratulations too on finding 3 nice rings...:smile:

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. On objects of the ring type, the eddy currents are very well concentrated around the circumference of the ring - and therefore such an object can obtain slightly better detection properties than a coin of the same diameter.

    Regarding the dispersion of VDI numbers, other things are important, such as the purity of the gold, as well as the size and shape...

    SAVE_20240212_030042.jpg

    SAVE_20240212_025908.jpg

    • Like 3
  11. Jeff ..Rutus detectors have a very smooth True all metal mode...in multi-frequency mode..Dual mode .,,.,,,,, so it is not a problem to hit the finest targets,,,

    in the pictures, I only document what VERSA is capable of on multi-frequency, if you focus on selective ...detection of targets from ID 7-11 from among iron...on an old stone road...
    ..
    On my test field, I have a gold 0.05 gram gold segment buried at a depth of 10 cm in a low mineralized subsoil...
    if the detector can hit this target...in discrimination mode, it is a powerful detector..

     Target /N.2/0.05 gram Gold in 10 cm depth .. on my test field...

    IMG_20211107_165315_793.jpg

    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

     Rutus ATREX  ...

    Rutus *Atrex on multi-frequency program Coin
    the first target is 0.05 grams of gold, at a depth of 10 cm /marked yellow/
    the second target ... is 50 euro cents per 37 cm,/ not marked/
    the third target is a copy /0.19 grams of lead/ of a very small 5 mm coin 1/24/stater at a depth of 11 cm../marked Red/

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...