Gold Catcher

You don't need any rod, sometimes just a good pair of eyes is enoug. Like in this clip. By the way, does anybody know who that is?

https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/water-dowsing?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects Read the paragraph: science behind dowsing. Whether water dowsing or any other dowsing, none of this has any reality to it. Advice: when posting links about a subject make sure the source is reputable. This one is from usgs.gov

Chet, if you prefer a GPX5000 type smooth treshold, then use Lunk's settings for the 7000. That's as close as it can get.

This is an amazing thread guys, considering that we are in the 21st century. I guess people are made to believe and this has not changed over the centuries. I went way too many years to university to take any of this nonsense seriously. That being said, I totally respect and understand everyone who believes in this sort of magic. The only divining I'm interested in is to figure out the exact specs of the 6000 because I just can't wait.🤣🤣

Same here. Haven't seen one profile yet where the parenthesis "(soon)" is removed. Let's see who does it first! I suspect it will be Gerry... JP does'nt count, of course.

Great plan, Erik. This is the best way to go. I had the same approach when moving up to Northern California and (perhaps naively) talked to the rangers in the state recreation areas. Very nice and polite guys, but as you can image there was 0 tolerance.

She better hires security to not be run over by the horde of 6000 freaks...

Already got one to play with? 😉

6000 is sure thing for me, just waiting for it now

Something tells me we will have a nice little 200 DP forum member presence there, given the popularity of the last thread...🤣

The 6000 will offer much more automation, hence these different techniques with the GPZ will not be that relevant anymore across operators. Now, the focus will all be on having fun with a light weight detector, enjoying ML's brilliant engineering, and most of all: make enough research about the area where you hunt so you can actually get the coil over gold. That has always been my most important task.

That's the beauty of metal detecting. Every operator does it slightly differently but with some general rules that should be adhered to. Where I hunt I need to include small gold as well, 7 g's nuggets are rare. Hence, I focus on balancing different ground conditions mostly by adjusting sensitivity and volume/threshold settings without touching smoothing at all. Sometimes, switching to normal and also to difficult (if needed) helps as well. By the end of the day though the results matter the most, so I found this strategy works best for me where I usually hunt. That being said, in your grounds the way you run your machine delivers best results for you. That's great. You can't argue with having gold in the scoop! 🙂

Here is a good explanation about the depth/signal strength relationship: "an increase in depth of 12% will result in the signal halving in strength, and an increase of 47%, that is say 40cm to 59cm, results in the signal being 10 times smaller." It's in Bruce Candy's "holy bible". I recommend memorizing the whole document like a poem. 😇😇😇😇👨‍🎓👨‍🎓

Complete agree. I can't recall a single time where a target that I heard at gain 18 would not be heard at gain 12 or even 10. In particular with HY/normal/ smoothing off. I hardly ever use smoothing.

And from what it appears, ML created some really interesting new coils too, exemplified with the 6000 and more probably to come. Who knows, perhaps they start engaging more in coil innovation going forward with the new 14DD being something really unique, to just name a recent example. I have no doubt they could be market leaders in that segment too, considering their expertise, resourcing and ability for mass production. I think Steve talked about that earlier already. 🙂

Stunning, thanks for sharing. These quartz veins look juicy. I would definitely crush some material up and pan out. How deep do these veins go do you know?

I might wait for the 1000 (and compare with the AT.....)

I should have included the AT for my comparison question, my bad 😁

Thanks a lot, Gerry! That really makes a strong case. I have never used/owned the NOX but I will definitely consider adding it to my fleet. Amazing that there is only such a small price difference, as you have said before.

Yes, 2 is usually my to go settings as well, on occasion 3. But the threshold is generally very chirpy above 3. On the 6000 the 14DD is supposed to have a superior ground (-or EMI) cancelling ability, but it will be interesting to compare the 11 in mono on the 6000 with the 8 in mono on the SDC with respect to threshold stability/sensitivity. It takes a while to get used to the SDC threshold.

JP, never been to the "famous" Rye Patch in NV? 🙂

Beautiful gold, Dan! 1/10th of that would be a good day for me with the SDC 🙂

Gerry, in your oppinion does the EQ-800 outperform the GM/5 inch on really small gold?

This will remain to be seen. The 8 in coil, combined with being water proof and newspaper size collapsing still are unique features for the SDC. I also believe that MPF and Geo-PI could have different application potentials. For small washes with shallow gold and highly mineralized soil the SDC is just an incredible machine. The 11 inch coil of 6000 is significantly bigger and will not reach where the 8 inch can squeeze in. But since I will be owning both detectors I will see myself. Perhaps I change my mind then (although I doubt it). Something tells me I will be loving both. 🙂

I believe the extra pins are related to the 14DD coil control options via push button. I might be wrong.