Jump to content

Baiker

Full Member
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Everything posted by Baiker

  1. It is very difficult to communicate through an online translator, but I hope we understand each other correctly. Herein lies the problem. It is necessary that Minelab should limit access to food, but do not prohibit users to remove the handle with the control unit without losing the warranty.
  2. This is understandable. The main issue was that when removing the control unit with the handle will not lose the warranty.
  3. Steve, thanks, great pictures with sizes. The size in inches is shown? But we want the compactness, like Deus or GM, here many people think how to modernize it / modify it without losing the warranty.
  4. Before making a choice between 600 and 800, you need to read the manual and understand how they differ.
  5. And when will a complete Instruction Manual for both the 600 and 800 models?
  6. Thank you. We will wait for the completion of work on the program. But it would be desirable, that volume of iron in 50 tones could be changed.
  7. Steve, hello! I want to ask a question. Adjusting the volume of the tone of the iron will be available in all modes of audiotones: 1, 2, 5 and 50? In the 50-tone mode and the fully open discriminator (all metals), you can reduce the volume of the iron tone? From -9 to 0 one tone? Or 9?
  8. «В ближайшие недели будут объявлены дополнительные сведения о продукте и доступности продукта ». Maybe I'm wrong, and it's long been written
  9. Steve, I'm definitely not a troll. We in Russia are very interested in Equinox and, thanks to you and your answers, we get new knowledge.
  10. The users asked to ask the following question: Is the Equinox snapshot or open gate ? So where will the Equinox fall ? Your personal opinion.
  11. Mr. Hershbah, did you work with G2, what is the difference between the mode of prospecting EQUINOX 800 from the G2 prospecting mode?
  12. Steve, Derek, thank you very much for the clarification.
  13. Steve, thank you, we will wait for the detailed information. And do you use reactivity 1 and 8 in your search?
  14. Maybe tomorrow, however, Steve will appear and explain what the difference is and what their relationship
  15. So I wanted to understand what their relationship is: 1 = 1,2 = 4,3 = 8? or 1 = 2.2 = 4.3 = 6? That is, without the slowest and fastest? I apologize, I write through Google translator
  16. I would like to ask how the 8 speeds of the response of the 800-th model correspond to the 3-rd speeds of the response of the 600th model.
×
×
  • Create New...