Jump to content

midalake

Full Member
  • Posts

    1,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Everything posted by midalake

  1. I am just perplexed at the factory settings of the Legend. How could Nokta set their own machine up for failure so much? I do not think I have seen worse factory Beach settings on any other machine. EVER. Doubt I will get another shot to test one. 🙄
  2. Yes, that is why I rely on my other brilliant friend that has owned the Manticore for over a year. 😎 Yes, maybe. The IF of 5 did a great job of taking care of the multi metal 1-2 and 5 peso coins. I may have been able to turn it down some.
  3. I have hunted in recovery of 6 for a long time. But from memory, I do not think there was much difference between 4-6 recovery when I was testing. Everything else would have to be tested.
  4. I checked and yes, the lower is CF. However, there is too much flex in this set-up for me. I could not hunt it. That flex coming from the upper.
  5. Yes. Hunting in Beach 2, 1 tone, horseshoe mode on. ALL Iron will double ring or have a target break down in response at depth. We are talking targets deep enough that will not TID properly anyway. Remember 1 tone so everything sounds the same. [for the most part]. The key is coil control. Slow coil movement is necessary to let the ferrous sounds off twice. In the case of nonferrous at depth. It will ONLY single ring. You cannot make it double ring. In my experience the signal will sound good 360 degrees around. Good being: clean with no breaks, clicks, or double rings. Shallow nonferrous will double ring......but this is what you have the TID display for. Showing positive numbers. FYI The 900 Equinox is also masterful at this in Beach 2.
  6. Re-checked settings: Salt [st] 2, Iron [IF] 5, Audio [AG] 6. Bottle [bc] 1..... Recovery speed was tested from 1-3. We thought 1 was giving better responses than 3. The higher you went the worse response on fringe targets. In summary: I do not think any of our settings hurt this test of the Legend.
  7. Still have the unit, will double check the setting. I am tall and had to have the shaft extended to its limits. The lower rod is not CF and the shaft is junk.
  8. This was a fully updated Legend. We used Gigamasters settings and with limited time just stayed with those. I don't think Beast mode is for beach hunting. Not sure what your "DT" reference is? We did release any setting that might upset depth performance and tested from all metal to discrimination of 10. Even experimenting with recovery speed. Our surprise and confusion was, the Legend could run at full sensitivity yet not obtain the depth of the other machines on the beach. To be honest, this was not even close. Maybe the Black Sand? Don't know?
  9. OK, back to testing. We were out for 14 days straight for Easter. Legend, Manticore and Equinox 900 were the new machines worked this trip. Comparisions will be made to long time machines I run here, being the D2 and Equinox 800. Legend. Testing was done in Multi Wet as we always hunt in wet and water contact. If anyone has setting questions, ask. 1. It was difficult to work the legend in ANY moving water. The rod has way too much flex. 2. The Legend was really stable on the wet sand with black sand. Water contact was quiet and what little testing we did, it appeared that recoveries with moving water would work. 3. We accomplish 30 sensitivity on the wet sand. HOWEVER, 4 different tests on different days and locations, Showed the Legend could not hear a buried gold ring set at a fringe depth. Every other detector we tested could hear the gold ring and identify it. We even had recovery speed down to 1. ** The Legend is VERY recovery sensitive. Caution should be given to swing speed. Because of the major failure of the Legend in buried ring testing we never really hunted it for more than an hour session. Equinox 900. Testing was done in Beach 2, one tone, horseshoe on. We did not find any big changes one way or another from the 800 in operating on this beach. The 900 was stable and maybe you could run a little more sensitivity in the wet sand EMI seemed to be good. Water contact was close to the same with maybe a little more sensitivity issue. Water recoveries could be done. Gold ring testing on multiple days had the 900 on par with the Manticore and 800. We did not find stability issues like others found. Manticore: While I only hunted it for about an hour. My friend and I spent days looking at each other's targets and ring testing. Many different modes were tried, and settings. At the end of the day, we did not find one target that the other person could not identify or hear. Direct buried ring testing showed there were better settings to use as several times the 800 and 900 surpassed the Manticore. Oddly enough, with this updated unit we found Surf and Seawater to be unstable for its purpose. Last year we found Surf and Seawater to be our favorite. In summary: We found all of the Minelab machines, 800,900, and Manticore to be very close salt water and black sand beach tools. The only drawback was if the Manticore was not set properly the Equinox 800 and 900 could beat it. 😎
  10. Complete, found as one. Thanks! Equinox 800, full water contact. No Diamond tester here. But my friend is interested in purchasing one so will get an appraisal soon.
  11. Without question my best find ever. I am stunned and speechless. 26" of chain everything with hallmarks. What a great hobby!
  12. Thanks, got a set to pair.
  13. We have a Legend at the beach for testing but forgot headphones. Will the Deus 2 phones pair? Also is it the same headphone jack as the Deus? Will a wired pair work from D2? Any other simple options? Thanks
  14. Question for you experts in manual GB on the D2. Let's say your machine picks "80" after doing the GB procedure. Does anyone see an advantage being a couple of points higher or lower in ground balance from what the machine picks? Thanks.
  15. Yes, partly. But you still have to have the detector set correctly. [tougher with the D2] I have no doubt that your land programs react totally different than on this salt beach. The Equinox is just killer in salt on Beach 2, 1 tone, Horseshoe mode on. The D2 no doubt could have found this in my older program, But currently running a full tones program with magnetic reject I have my doubts. I had the D2 out yesterday to a different beach that is target laden and I found very few small bits. Which has been the norm over the last month. [we will talk about those beach modes when you're ready!!!] Keep me posted when you go. 😎
  16. So, after using so many different detectors in the last 50 years, some things never cease to amaze. There were so many fan boys when the D2 came out and how it was going to RULE small everything. Well, we know that did not happen. YET, the Equinox never falters and excels at small bits. Got this pear-shaped diamond surrounded by many small chips. It looks like a setting that came apart from a ring. Nothing has been tested nor certified. I suspect from the look and quality it is real. Rang a solid hard 8 on the Equinox in Beach 2. Had big waves and lost it through the scoop on the first try. Was lucky to reacquire and run it up the beach to find. Interested to see how others are doing on small bits!!!
×
×
  • Create New...