broadfield

Deus II WS6 Master and save yourself a grand. Performance of these two machines is pretty much equal.

Have you actually tried it? Whilst targets in a normal disc program may get dragged down Into the 30’s or 40’s, Tekknna is not using disc, this setting in full tones is more of a threshold for the offset. I think it actually separates better because the target ID’s are being pushed into their respective tone bins rather than being averaged by disc.

Could they possibly be re-launching the V3i with updated software. That machine had a lot of potential but was never quite finished, the display was way ahead of its time. Failing that a multifrequency MXT re-launch, now that would be a seriously good detector.

No actually the complete opposite, I’ve found v2.0 the deepest of all versions.

It says in the manual that there is program specific signal processing. Also from v1.1 Sens FT uses a different silencer.

V1.1 Frequency Max & Square Hi Tones are game changers, couple this with the bug fixes and performance enhancements and revised silencer, you have a serious bit of kit.

From a UK point of view I don’t think Garrett are up there in the top four. The UK Fisher would be like C Scope, been around 40+ years but same old tech. Its a shame Rutus don’t have stronger marketing as they are very good underrated detectors.

Fire the machine up in General program and start using, then press bottom left audio shortcut button and select equilizer, make a small change then use back keys to go back to detect screen, profile is now the horseshoe and not big numbers. This was in v1.0, haven’t tried it in v1.1 yet.

Yes I see what you mean, I just replicated it.

Fast and sensitive are the same FMF platform/frequency bands, the only difference is fast uses a less filtered audio.

Care to elaborate please?

If we all did that then there would never be any feedback or updates to machines, I would rather be on the journey early enjoying a new machine and proving feedback to the manufacturer if I thought it would improve performance. Its no different for nearly all new tech, the latest iPhone will have updates within weeks of its release. In this hi-tech software driven world nothing is ever truly finished.

I thought 0.71 added iron volume to full tones?

WSA Wireless headphones, same as used on the ORX.

The D1 can be a very deep machine, just need to understand it

Unless I am missing something that does not discuss subtraction or addition?

Depending on what program you select on the Deus II it processes using one of the above methods, curious to know what other MF detectors may be using like the Legend or NOX. As far as I know you don’t get a choice with those. What do they actually do? I am assuming subtraction will not include ground responses from iron and salt based minerals so will be quieter but less deep on fringe targets whereas addition will add in the ground responses but may be noisier but deeper on fringe targets that start taking on the ground. Am I on the right lines? Thanks.

You have to get used to it but full tones in pwm gives you a wealth of info.

In my opinion nothing, in fact the the audio language compared to the D1 in full tones is vastly improved and gives a lot more info.

I have found the opposite most I have spoken to and myself included find the D2 a very deep sensitive machine on the beach but just can’t make it rock & roll on pasture.

General uses the widest span of frequencies out of all the programs, I use it on new sites to get a feel. Then swap to sensitive if it need the weighting at higher frequencies or park / deep hc if I need a lower frequency weighting.

C-Scope here in the UK still make Analogue machines

That makes sense thanks. so for the addition it’s opposite, in that you add a frequency like 40khz to make the signal more sensitive to a desired target?

So with subtraction the higher frequency will be less sensitive to low conductive targets like small gold?