Jump to content

Lunk

Full Member
  • Posts

    1,141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Magazine

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Lunk

  1. When browsing the specs link from page 2 of this thread, I noticed something new that I've not seen in a detector before:

    IMG_0437.PNG.68d6ee0cf485447a4d64633e8c1def21.PNG

    2 automatic sensitivity settings, Auto and Auto+. Any theories on how these work? Perhaps they work in tandem with the auto ground balance and maybe Auto+ is some sort of sensitivity boost?

  2. Logically, if your specimen is in fact a meteorite with very little or no nickel, it would only be very weakly attracted to a magnet. The fact that it is strongly attracted to a magnet, gives a null response on your detector and has no discernible fusion crust or regmaglypts (thumbprints) points to a terrestrial origin - magnetite. Also, only freshly fallen meteorites are black, and they have a smooth, uniform surface, never broken up and pitted as the surface of your specimen shows. 

    Example of a freshly fallen stony meteorite:

    IMG_0381.JPG

    • Like 3
  3. Here are a  few more of the meteorites I've found within the Franconia strewn field.

    This is a "puzzle" meteorite; several fragments that fit together. They were all excavated from the same dig hole:

    IMG_0308.PNG

     

    This beautiful individual stone was hidden in plain sight among some basalt boulders:

    IMG_0311.PNG

     

    This nifty little chondrite was also nestled between basalt boulders:

    IMG_0310.PNG

     

    This small individual was found while revisiting an area in the small end of the strewn field, an area that a friend and I first detected for gold nuggets in 1999. We didn't find any gold, but each of us did find a handful of small "hot rocks" that we tossed aside. Had we known then what stony meteorites were, we may have been the first to discover the strewn field:

    IMG_0309.PNG

    • Like 4
  4. A few years ago I was detecting in the Franconia strewn field in Mohave County, Arizona. Out of the corner of my eye, I spotted a reddish orange rock that stood out in stark contrast from the surrounding light-colored soil. After careful excavation, I was holding the largest meteorite I've found to date. 

    IMG_0313.PNG

    IMG_0312.PNG

     

    • Like 2
  5. Another cold find from northern Nevada. I was detecting for gold nuggets with my GPX 5000 along a narrow wash that had lots of exposed bedrock. Upon hearing a moderate signal, I looked down and instantly recognized the small meteorite; you'll notice in the pic how it stands out from the surrounding soil and rocks. I'll never have this one classified because it's a complete individual; cutting it would ruin it. 

    IMG_0318.JPG

    • Like 7
  6. There's not a lot of activity on the meteorite forum, so I thought I'd start a new thread to hopefully jump-start things. It's an invitation for forum members to post pics and/or stories of theirs or others meteorite finds.

    When I'm not hunting gold, I'm chasing meteorites. There's nothing quite like finding a rock that is literally out of this world.

    For meteorites that I have had classified, I've included links to their entries in the Meteoritical Society's catalog of officially recognized meteorites. They are cold finds; for those not familiar with the terminology, a cold find is newly discovered meteorite that is not part of any known fall or strewn field. So enjoy, and lets see some meteorites!

    IMG_0315.PNG

     

    IMG_0314.PNG

    https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Diablo+Pass&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal table&code=35516

    IMG_0306.PNG

    IMG_0307.PNG

    https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Quartzsite&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal table&code=35634

    IMG_0317.PNG

    image.jpeg

    IMG_0316.PNG

    https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Imlay&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal table&code=52855

    I'll have more to share later...

    • Like 8
  7.  

    Brian,

    A quote from JP in another topic regarding the GPZ seems to be applicable here:

    "Difficult and Normal: Difficult removes ground signal but also the null points of the modes (High Yield, General and Xtra Deep) are different to each other across the Ground Type modes (Difficult compared to Normal). For instance a 1/2 ounce solid nugget will give a better response in General Difficult than in General Normal, this is not due to ground signal but more to do with the modes sensitivity points. Some nuggets will fall into a modes least sensitive position that's why it pays to go over ground with a variety of modes."

    • Like 1
  8. 12 hours ago, G.B. said:

    From watching the video it appears that there is no threshold.

    I cranked the volume when watching the video, and there is a very faint threshold; the audio quality of the video is poor, and I believe the microphone used to record it didn't have a very wide dynamic range. So it registered louder sounds like the bird and the target responses while muting the quieter sounds like the threshold and some of the conversation, and could have caused the clipping effect as well. 

  9. The first thing I noticed when listening to the audio is that the threshold level seems to be set too low, which clips the target response; a faint target below the clipping point will not be audible. Also, notice how the target response is inverted. Instead of the traditional high-low tonal response to a small nugget. the QED produces a low-high response. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...