-
Posts
1,183 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
34
Content Type
Forums
Detector Prospector Home
Detector Database
Downloads
Posts posted by Lunk
-
-
8 hours ago, Valens Legacy said:
Looks as though everyone had a good hunt, did anyone use the outhouse by any chance.
Good luck on your next hunt.
Good guess VL, but it's not a concrete outhouse; someone on here should know what it is…🤔
- 2
-
Fun trip with excellent saves and a great detector training class as always, Gerry! Looking forward to the 1 on 1 gold and space rock training down here in the warm and sunny Arizona desert.😎🌵
- 5
-
On 7/29/2022 at 2:46 AM, Tony said:
Two seconds later…
Tony, is that ground uniformly hot, or is it variable?
- 2
-
-
Good on you, GC; just a simple matter of having the right tool for the job. That General/Difficult combo even works great against magnetite hot rocks too.
- 1
- 2
-
27 minutes ago, Steve Herschbach said:
I admit I read this thread with a degree of satisfaction, and a feeling of being vindicated. As a prototype tester I put out a very early report on the GPX 6000 trying to tell U.S. operators only (not Australian users or X Coil users) exactly what is now becoming accepted as fact. And that is, for the average U.S. user, especially new buyers, the GPX 6000 is a better value than the GPZ 7000. Despite my clearly stated caveats, however, I got enough blowback from the very people I was exempting from my commentary, that I pulled all my reviews and information on the 6000. I did finally post them again about three months ago, once the heat died down.
I must say that the quality control, and therefore all the problems people have had with the GPX 6000, have been very disappointing. The fact is most people do not have issues, but so many do, including quite a few people that I know and respect, that it has taken some shine off what should have been a truly excellent release by Minelab. Were it not for the issues that plagued some people, a lot of the pushback would not have existed. We hear "yes, it does find gold, but the problems......" far too often.
Still, the Minelab GPX 6000 for me is a joy to swing, and literally paid for mine in two days last fall, on the kind of gold the GPZ 7000 is weak on, and that I had been over and missed with the 7000. Again, because of the grief I was given, I did not post about any of my GPX 6000 finds last year, but it has left me with a hole in my Steve's Mining Journal last year, that needs to be filled. So I will finally get around to writing that up and posting about it soon. Thanks Gerry, and everyone else posting on their GPX 6000 success, for making me feel more like saying something now, than I have this last year.
A few ounces of GPX 6000 finds from the Mother Lode country.....
Steve, I know pictures don’t do justice when it comes to gold, but those look like some really spectacular specimens, WTG! Looking forward to your GPX 6000 journal entry.
- 6
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Gerry, In my experience of swinging the GPX 6000 since last June, I have to agree that it is the king when it comes to the shear number of nuggets it can find compared to the GPZ 7000. But at the same time, it is also the court jester when it comes to quality; I had to send in 2 of my 3 coils for replacement, which prompted me to buy a spare coil to have on hand when the next failure happens.
During the winter desert prospecting season of 2020, it took me nearly 4 months to find 100 Arizona nuggets with the GPZ 7000, as detailed below:
This past winter season however, going over the same areas with the GPX 6000 netted the same number of nuggets in only a couple of weeks. And the total take for my first season with the GPX 6k is multiple hundreds of nuggets at a combined weight of 5 ounces, which is an ounce more than found with the GPZ 7k during the previous season on the same patches. The amount of sub-gram bits left behind by the 7000 in some spots was truly mind boggling. Also, there was a noticeable increase in the number of specie bits, porous “popcorn” gold and crystalline pieces. This, in combination with all the reasons Gerry mentioned, certainly makes the GPX 6000 the king in my book.
Pictured below is the 5-ounce pile of nuggets recovered during my first season with the 6k:
- 15
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
14 hours ago, Coiltek said:maybe DD coils one day, you never know
9 hours ago, Skookum said:Hear, hear. The 6000 deserves a smaller, more manageable, DD in the line up. It’s salt and EMI cancel modes are largely ignored with the unwieldy 14”.
As evidenced by this thread, the demand for a small DD coil appears to be high; I would certainly purchase one, and I know other operators who would too. So Trevor, hopefully soon you can change your post above to read, “GOLDHAWK DD coils coming soon!”
- 11
-
A stellar training session, Gerry, thanks for sharing!
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Randy Lunn said:
I just love getting out into nature. The thrill of being in a beautiful area with the sense of adventure and the chance to find stuff is exhilarating.
Couldn’t have said it better, Randy. Congrats on the nuggets and other finds. That’s a beaut of a chondrite, they don’t get more perfect than that.
- 3
-
GC, just wondering if you tried the 6k with the DD coil in that environment? I had great success running the older GPX machines with a DD coil in cancel mode (just like the 6k DD in EMI cancel) in the volcanics of the El Paso Mountains. The conductive ground cancel may work as well.
- 1
- 1
-
22 hours ago, BMc said:14 hours ago, GotAU? said:
The 6k 17” Minelab elliptical is sensitive and not bad to handle, I like using that to cover ground quickly in the flats. Not bad for $360 US either.
So we’re expected to pay more for a small 10x5 than a large 17 ellip ??? 😳
- 1
- 1
-
Great blow-by-blow account of the weekend, amigo; good times as always!
- 1
-
-
5 hours ago, Gold Seeker said:
Are you listening, Minelab? If anyone can invent said time machine, it's Bruce Candy and ML's R&D! Because of your detector tech innovations, there will be no detectable gold left to find in the future, so the only solution is to detect in the past. Certainly, ML must have at least applied for a patent on a flux capacitor by now…🤔
BTW, great post on Vic's gold history, GJ.
- 2
- 7
-
1 hour ago, Goldseeker5000 said:
I have 25-50 mph winds to hunt in today. Fun fun.
Sounds like a great day for winnowing!
- 1
- 2
-
Great job tracking down those space rocks, amigo…that big one is a real trophy…WTG!
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Seems Minelab have the story and photos on their site:
https://www.minelab.com/community/success-stories/largest-arizona-gold-nugget
- 10
- 4
-
Way to persevere and get the gold!
- 1
-
I’ll be sure to drop by your booth, Reese.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, aerospace guy said:
2nd question is have you Gerry and others 'hammered' Rye Patch with 6000's and is there still gold to be found? What other Nevada areas do people have success detecting? I KNOW I KNOW...people are SO closed mouth about areas but not me ..I tell people what areas I have success..I just don't pinpoint them.
The GPX 6000 hasn’t been out long enough yet for Rye Patch to be hammered by it, so yes, nuggets can still be found there with it and other machines, as you witnessed during the training class. Nugget hunters have successfully detected gold at many locations throughout Nevada, many of which are detailed here.
- 2
-
1 hour ago, aerospace guy said:
I've gone up and down countless 'washes' and they are always loaded with lead and trash...what do you guys running the 6000 do in those cases?
We grab our discriminating VLF machines and leave the 6000's in the truck, especially if there is lots of ferrous trash, but even then, you still have to dig the non-ferrous trash like lead, shell casings, aluminum and copper targets, etc. If the majority of the nuggets in an area hit a certain conductivity range, then they can be cherry-picked by just going after targets that fall within that range; you'll leave gold behind that falls outside of that range, but it's a good compromise and increases the gold to trash ratio, which is handy when you don't have much time to detect.
- 5
-
AG, that’s a decent chunk of the good stuff…WTG!
-
4 hours ago, GB_Amateur said:
I'm curious to read how this compares to @Lunk's GB meteorite finds in terms of size. I was thinking most meteorites found there are pretty small pieces, not 6/7 of a lb.
The largest stone I recall finding at GB was around 500 grams.
- 1
Final Trip Of 2022 To N. Nevada & Rye Patch Results
in Detector Prospector Forum
Posted
🤣Nope, guess again!