Jump to content

gambler

Full Member
  • Posts

    383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Magazine

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by gambler

  1. On 5/22/2015 at 8:24 AM, Steve Herschbach said:

    Ray, I made the 10K thing up to illustrate the point of such a detector being desirable. I have no idea when or if such a detector will appear, or what it will cost.

    On the other hand if I could get my hands on a PI that discriminated to full depth for 10K I estimate I could pay for it with gold found in less than two weeks at several locations I know of.

    if i read between the lines correctly, are you saying you you've avoided some areas with known gold because the gold to trash ratio means too much digging of trash.

  2. 6 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

    Hardly any MX Sport owners left here so you might want to post on the White's MX Sport forum. They claim they have let up on the censorship there, and you would reach more MX Sport owners there than here.

    Paul self banned here and on Toms forum but is still posting on Findmall.

    I'm still here. But I have nothing constructive to add, except I found a dime at 6 inches. I don't know how to evaluate recovery speed, and I still don't understand the term "tone smearing". (does that make me the perfect mxs user?:))

    Thanks tom for participating in the forum. I'm sure everyone appreciates it.

  3. 3 hours ago, auminesweeper said:

    To be honest apart from releasing some silly Video's All that has happened is the machine was put in production before it was tested properly by people actually have the knowledge and ability to put VLFs through their paces and be able to translate their findings in to a constructive format to allow the Programmers to configure the software to it's ultimate setting,

    I hope Whites have learned by this and in future confide in people like Steve and others from around the world and trust such people with doing the right thing, Some of us actually take the machines we use more seriously and we want these new machines to be the best they can be,

    I hope Whites will work closer with us then we can avoid anything like this happening in the future.

    john  

    that may not be exactly what happened, I do beta testing on equipment that cost more than most detectors, sometimes you are dealing with many firm or software files with small differences,. what can happen in the development process is a bug is found, a fix is created, the version is sent out to beta testers, fix is confirmed, but another bug is created. sometimes the other bug is caught. sometimes not. this goes on and on, files are stacked up and saved. that way you can roll back if you cause some major crash or instability.

    sometimes, production uses the wrong file, which may have the new bug or an old bug that was fixed in a later file. final beta is on the production release,HOWEVER, if a fatal flaw is found production will be delayed, if its missed, the customer becomes an inadvertent part of the testing chain. also, if any hardware changes are made then firmware can be affected, so beta starts again, but may only include testing for things the change MAY have an effect on. sometimes you miss stuff. 

    I'm not trying to make excuses for any company, but after being involved with beta testing for many years, I have seen some bugs slip through on expensive stuff. especially if their is a deadline set in stone to meet. it sounds easy to test for every eventuality, but in reality it's tedious and fraught with chances to make errors. I've made some. so has every company, wasn't there an update for the GPZ, with a disc too?  

    personally I was hoping to have already ordered my mxs by now, but I'll wait and see, and give them a chance to win me. good luck whites.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...