Jump to content

lauchon03

Member
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13

About lauchon03

  • Rank
    Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. if you know if someone else had the same problem of sudden death in the detector? ..... on the other hand I was doing depth tests with nugget in At gold, At Max and equinox 800 .... the At gold with coil of 8.5x11 "has more depth in nuggets of 0.5gr in 1gr onwards ... now I want to try the Nel storm coil is" DD "and a little bigger .... with respect to the Equinox I can not get used to so much noise on my ground I feel that garrett is more stable and silent
  2. Hi guys, I have a question, can a coil break the detector computer? because a friend has a garrett at gold and he placed the Nel Storm coil for AT GOLD, after using it for a few hours I turned off the detector for lunch, and when turning it on it did not work anymore, the garrett guarantee said it was a factory problem and it replaced. Now, I want to try that coil with different large nuggets 5g, 10g and 15g but I'm afraid to break my detector, is there any way to check the resistance of the coil and values are optimal for AT gold? Could the coil break the detector? I clarify that it is a coil for AT gold
  3. Cómo configurar el equinoccio 600 el más cercano al modo dorado del equinoccio 800, quiero hacer una prueba de profundidad con una pepita de oro de 14gr. ¿Cambiará la profundidad en relación con el equinoccio 800 en una pepita de 14 gramos?
  4. next week I will compare the AT max At Gold and the EQ 800 of a friend to see how he behaves, I do not have to compare the rest of the equipment, it seems to me that I will go to the Eq 800: D this is me
  5. in very small nuggets the AT max did not generate a signal while at Gold emitted a clear signal, we compared it quite a lot in the gold mines .... I would like a good configuration detector that gives me options to play depending on the work area, rechargeable battery, wireless headphones, waterproof against rain and accidental wetting .... not much more
  6. I like to have options to play depending on the area where I am detecting, I do not want the lack of adjustments to limit me. As for the price here in Argentina all the detectors that I comment at a similar price. 80 -90% of the use is gold nuggets, 20 -10% copper silver coins. I detect in old gold tillage in floods, there is fine and coarse gold, the previous weekend my at gold did not detect a nugget from 14 -15gr to 25 -30cm while at max if ... I do not intend to find gold at 1 meter deep but go as deep as a VLF can
  7. Thank you very much for your answer .... I tell you that with the AT gold I take out pips the size of a louse, but I get my attention as in the 15gr nugget of the photo I did not detect it and the AT Max yes, that is the main reason to update my old At gold
  8. very well I will take it into account ... I would like to know which is the VLF detector that has better depth and less loss in small nuggets, (makro gold kruzer, EQ 800, Xp orx, goldmaster 24k) always speaking on a moderate to high ground mineralization
  9. There are many reasons, I need a device that is comfortable light because we detect about 4500 to 5000 meters above sea level, low electricity consumption and especially the price, here in Argentina we have exaggeratedly high customs taxes for example a minelab 5000 costs approximately $ 6000 6500 dollars
  10. I know that pulse induction is better, but I am considering only VLF equipment
  11. GOld monster has more depth than equinox 800?
  12. Hi guys, my name is Cristian, I'm from Argentina, my detector is a Garret AT Gold, I use it to search for gold nuggets in the Andes mountain range. I have very good results with very small, tiny nuggets, but I think I'm losing some depth, I compared it to the Garrett AT Max and apparently it has a little more depth but not so much sensitivity to small nuggets. I want to change the AT Gold for another detector that gains depth in larger gold (2gr, 5gr, 10gr etc). Do you offer me minelab equinox 800, makro gold kruzer, goldmaster 24K, xp orx, which recommend me to have greater depth in large or acceptable nuggets and not lose much effectiveness in small nuggets? I found the gold nugget in my hand with the AT MAX at 20-25cm, with the AT GOLD I had no signal I leave some photos to see the gold that took out the AT gold. regards p / d: sorry for my english, I used google: D
  13. Hi guys, my name is Cristian, I'm from Argentina, my detector is a Garret AT Gold, I use it to search for gold nuggets in the Andes mountain range. I have very good results with very small, tiny nuggets, but I think I'm losing some depth, I compared it to the Garrett AT Max and apparently it has a little more depth but not so much sensitivity to small nuggets. I want to change the AT Gold for another detector that gains depth in larger gold (2gr, 5gr, 10gr etc). Do you offer me minelab equinox 800, makro gold kruzer, goldmaster 24K, xp orx, which recommend me to have greater depth in large or acceptable nuggets and not lose much effectiveness in small nuggets? I found the gold nugget in my hand with the AT MAX at 20-25cm, with the AT GOLD I had no signal I leave some photos to see the gold that took out the AT gold. regards p / d: sorry for my english, I used google: D
×
×
  • Create New...