Jump to content

Lodge Scent

Full Member
  • Posts

    104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Magazine

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Lodge Scent

  1.  

    I tried the Sensitive Full Tone program last week. It surprised me by sniffing out a few buttons from a cellar hole site that hardly ever gives up a nonferrous target anymore. One major negative for me with this program was the iron falsing. It was very distracting particularly because it would show VDIs from low 70s to mid-80s. Increasing the Silencer or Bottle Cap Reject didn’t help. I ended up just ignoring all high tones then eventually just notched 70 to 99. Of course, that quieted down the machine, but a notch like that is only safe to use on your most pounded sites. But the program showed promise.


    I used it today at another worn out site and was even more impressed when it sniffed out 9 nonferrous targets (all mid conductors). I made a few changes that made it more usable. I had the Sensitivity at 95. I lowered it to 90 to see if it would help with the falsing but it made no difference, so I put it back to 95. Sensitivity at 95 gave a noticably stronger signal over a good target compared to 90. This program runs at a negative Disc of -6.7. I raised it to 7 but that really didn’t help quiet things down either, so I ran it with the negative Disc. When I got into the heavy iron and got sick of the all the falsing, I Notched out 70-77 and then also 97-99. Once again, this was a pounded site and the odds of a big silver or copper still lurking about was very slim. The notching really helped eliminate a lot of the falsing and made those mid conductor tones stand out in Full Tones. A couple of tombacs were really "fuzzy" becaus eof the iron but had enough of the midtone to make me dig. I used PWM but square tones might help even more. All targets had iron nearby or right in the hole with the good target. I used Reactivity of 2.5 and then 3 or even 4 in the very heavy iron.

    This could be a killer program if I can deal with the iron falsing. All this high-end notching is OK on my pounded sites, but I would not want to use it on a new site. The Full Tones did provide good audio clues. Most of iron that was falsing was easy enough to ID as iron with the Iron Volume at 4. Sometimes a quick swing around the target worked and a quick pinpoint showed that the good audio signal was off the tip target, giving it away as iron. Like I said, it was easy enough to ID the iron, but I would prefer NOT to have the falsing to begin with.


    I had used Full Tones all the time for the first couple years with my D1 but hadn’t used it at all for the past 5 years just because after using Multi Tones for a while, Full Tones just wasn't all that pleasant on the ears. I am definitely going to do some more work with this program. 

    Any suggestions to tame that iron falsing would be most appreciated!

     Jeff

     

    • Like 9
  2. I used Pitch in Square Tones on my last couple of hunts CPT and liked it. I can't make a judgement at this point on whether I think for me it offers more audio clues than PWM. Because Pitch in Square Tones is new to me, I am paying closer attention to the audio. It might be the fact I am paying closer attention because it is new, is the reason I put a few more iron masked targets in my finds bag. 😉 

    It's funny, I do think that is a real phenomenom. I'll try a new program or settings and I defintiely will pay more attention. Maybe that's the key to detecting. Mix it up and don't get complacent! 😁 

    • Like 4
  3. On 1/18/2023 at 9:31 AM, EL NINO77 said:

     because you may start to get a signal of a ground fault, for example with *ID at 99-98...

    Your observation played out exactly as you indicated El Nino. I have left the ground stabilizer at 2 since I got the D2 a year ago. Today I set it to 1. Yep, I got a lot of "99s".

    • Like 3
  4. On 1/6/2023 at 7:34 PM, Lodge Scent said:

    Raziel, Iron Volume doesn't impact raw depth directly. However, it is possible to miss a deep or weak nonferrous target if it is next to iron and you have the Iron Volume cranked up too high. You just might not hear that faint good signal.

    I should have mentioned I have extremely mild mineralization in my area. Folks are making very good points about Iron Volume in hot soils.

  5. Raziel, Iron Volume doesn't impact raw depth directly. However, it is possible to miss a deep or weak nonferrous target if it is next to iron and you have the Iron Volume cranked up too high. You just might not hear that faint good signal.

    • Like 2
  6. 3 hours ago, F350Platinum said:

    That aside I was kinda disappointed with the higher recovery speed when I saw how many fewer targets I was hearing in a trashy spot. When I have more time I'll try it more. 🙂

    Yep, I always hit the heavy iron spots at the cellar holes at least once with a very low Recovery speed. It does seem counterintuitive, I agree, but it sometimes takes that extra bit of "oomph" to hit a small or deeper target, on edge coin etc., nestled in amongst the iron. Hey here's an idea......maybe the next big breakthrough in metal detectors will be a Multi Reactivity unit. You heard it hear first ! 😀

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  7. On 12/1/2022 at 1:40 AM, Zord said:

    Okay, so Manticore fever reaches the top of Mount Everest.

    This is perfect, hopefully it will force the funny Frenchman to update D2.

    Yep, I can't but help think that XP is waiting to detratct from the Manticore release party with the D2 update. 😉

    • Like 3
  8. Nice work F350. I never noticed that big of a gain in depth with my 11" coil(s) on the D1, but the 40% gain in coverage (I did the math once, it's something like that) is significant. I've tried Reactivity = 0, but found I couldn't swing as slow as I should for too long before reverting to my normal swing speed. The D2 is much quieter than the D1 at low Reactivity speeds and the target separation at low Reactivity speeds is also much better with the D2 in my opinion. I'll routinely hunt in medium iron with R= 0.5 to 1.5 and find good targets comingled in the iron. If too much falsing, just raise the Reactivity a bit, it will help. But seeing how well you did with R=0, I will have to give it another try!

    That Griffith backmarked button is an awesome find! I have well over a thousand flat buttons but not a single one of those. Yeah those heavily gold-gilted buttons always give me a heart attack !

     

    • Like 4
  9. I need a coil cover for the wooded colonial homesites I hunt here in New England. Not so much to protect the bottom of the coil but more so to protect the edge of the coil from abrasions from the inevitable collisions with rocks and trees. I have worn out coil covers.

    • Like 2
  10. Very interesting. Funny, I have designed a similar program to the Silver Slayer program but I call it my deep iron-masked copper program. It's based on Park and it features Reactivity of 1.5, Silencer of 3 and a Bottle Cap reject of 5, and Notch up to 40 (I don't want to miss deep pewter buttons). I usually hunt with as few filters as possible, but when just trying Park out for the heck of it a few months back, I started digging some deep iron masked large cents from sites that I had pounded to death over the years. It got my attention. I can see the SS program being very effective. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...