Flavius Titus

JCR you are always so kind. So very simply it is ok that the value collapses to 0? You know actually, thinking it was a problem I never searched with the value on 0, I really think I was wrong so! That's fine then, I'll see if I can "listen" to the instrument next time and leave the value at 0. One more question, I noticed that Multi3 is really so much stable, much more than M1, but was it clear whether it is a Multi that works with high or low frequencies? Thank you

Good morning guys! I would need to understand if the behavior of my Legend is normal or if I need to go to service. Basically when I balance the instrument on the ground, the screen value tends to decrease until it reaches 0. Quite simply, maybe I'm looking in an area, terrain value 55, as I move (and I've noticed almost always on tilled/plowed terrain) and maybe I rebalance because the machine starts to be "noisy," with each pumping the value drops and reaches 0; it seems strange to me because often maybe from one area to another there are 50 meters and by now it's 4/5 times that it happens to me. Could it be that I find all soils with almost no mineralization and therefore the instrument cannot read it? Or am I doing something wrong? I would like to point out that if I switch the Legend to tracking mode, then it can read the value after a few minutes that I search. Thank you

Thanks JCR, when you mean 'tone break to 8' do you mean that you discriminate in custom mode up to 8, or that you activate the iron tone up to 8? Thanks

Hi guys, I would like to ask for a little advice. The legend after the 1.09 update I admit has improved a lot, however, I would like to submit a question. In my areas, on soils of the Italian peninsula, often the good targets are very deep, and therefore sound iron, until I go to open the hole for a few cm. Obviously given this peculiarity I keep the iron tone very high, even at 10. What I wanted to understand well is this: the IF, should it then be set close to 1? From what I am beginning to understand, using the instrument, is that a low Iron Filter sounds better even iron objects, and as I get closer to 8 I lose this characteristic, which I need so much though. At this point, do you also have any advice on how best to set St? Just to hear some opinions from more experts than me. In the meantime I'll leave you with a nice picture of the last outing here in the central Apennines.

Good evening, do I still have to reset everything as with the 1.08 update? Thanks

Will you also update it for other languages? thx

I reset tonight after updating yesterday, I hope it's the same, I did it on all 4 available profiles. Or do I have to do it immediately after the update?

Good morning folks! I have installed 1.08 at last! It would seem that with the Gain Audio set to 5 and IF set to 4, the iron is being detected quite well, I hope that by doing this I will be able to hear the deeper sounds better, which as in all metal sounds iron before digging in. NM did a beautiful job, I almost didn't get my hopes up. However I have yet to fully understand the St function, especially in real research.

One thing is not 100% clear to me, the new 'stability' option for exactly what purpose?

Thank you Jeff for the explanation, very kind of you. In many of my soils, as explained many times, I face really deep signals, good coins sounded like iron, and only after removing those 20 centimetres of soil is the signal finally clear. I will therefore have to figure out whether it is by holding the iron filter at half, or directly at 1, that I will get better results or whether it is the new Audio Gain setting that will give me more satisfaction.

So if I understand correctly, the iron filtering function will have a value from 1 to 8, so, at 1 it's basically off and the iron will be "heard" better by the metal detector, correct?

Bluetooth headphones work well with theshold only when set to 6 and with a threshold volume of at least 9. Hopefully they will correct this as soon as possible.

Thanks Rick, I thought it was coming at the end of May or first week of June, but I think he was referring to NM testers not the public.

You guys have a good afternoon (although I think it's 4 a.m. in the U.S.) I don't know if I am wrong place to post this question, but I wanted to know if there were any "rumors" about the release of the new legend update. Thanks!

You can search in Italy and in the countries I have listed. The problem comes when you find something antique. If I find a German WW2 helmet, that's it, I restore it and save it, and if I want I donate it to a local museum. If, on the other hand, you find a sestertius and you don't report it, especially in Italy and Greece (and I think Spain too, but I'm not sure if it's in all regions), you end up in trouble in no time at all. With the new laws enacted in Italy in March 2022, I can guarantee that the unjustified possession of archaeological property has become a criminal offence punished in an extremely serious manner. Then, that the controls are ridiculous and you have to do it on purpose to be discovered, you are absolutely right (half of those who get into trouble are the usual heroes of the Internet with their eagerness to appear always and everywhere posting photos and videos of everything they find). On average, however, those who find themselves in remote areas, I doubt if they report anything to the authorities, and the guy who told you this is right. I can assure you, however, that all finds must be reported, both on public and private land, in fact there is an absurd law of 1923 that indicates the " underground " and whatever is in it as state property. At what depth is not clear, and every time you are at the mercy of bureaucrats and absurd laws. Anyway thanks for the explanation about the laws in the US, I didn't know the part about public lands. Here in San Marino it doesn't change much anyway, under a certain age you must declare everything, that then the authorities are much less pressing is absolutely true, but it is so small the space of land where you can search, that by now almost everything there was to find, has been found.