Jump to content

Ra1973

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Ra1973's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (2/6)

0

Reputation

  1. Thank you so much for the replies and answers. Genuinely, i used the machine in several locations, for Caves, voids and catacombs it works very well almost 80-90% of the result was correct just if i chose the right type of the soil either if it is sandy, stony, granite, salty or any other, and it gives me accurate depth.(+/- 1 m). But when i tried to locate the metal it can't differentiate between minerals and real metals and it's depth.
  2. Generally, have tried any device? I will shared with you a sample of the output just to give you an idea How I can analyze the picture ? Advice me
  3. I'm lately bought a machine that scan under ground and produce 3d outputs pictures, the manufacturer claimed it is accurate results, I had a difficulties to analyze the pictures and I went to the field but the result was not satisfying and I know the area very well but the outcome was nothing. My question is : How to analyze the pictures ? Are there any software can analyze Easley ? what about the depth ? Error or shifting factor ?
  4. Does anyone use 3d under ground scanner ?
×
×
  • Create New...