Intronik

[DoKKK]

X-Ray AKA Intronik STF .  Аll parts of the metal detector, video version. May be interesting 

 

[EL NINO77]

 

AKA INTRONIK ... I think not many people have the opportunity to try this detector ... Since I recently got an Aka Intronik detector... even with three different coils, 13" coil 2a14Kzh, 13" coil 5a40khz and 9x12" coil 7-60khz... these are coils that work with different frequency pairs, it will be interesting to compare the performance detector capabilities on each of these coils .. for low .medium and high conductivity targets...

Already after the first tests, I got the feeling that the detector has a strong depth potential on my test field...and it can easily detect targets that I have buried in the ground...really deep for the size of the given target...

That's why I tested the Aka Intronik on the test pit... where I have made steps of 40cm, 44cm and 50 centimeters...   

For the beginning of the comparison, I will list the options Intronik has on program 2 "Standard" on the factory settings in airtest so that you can compare it with the detectors you own... coil 9x12" 7 and 60khz..

For this one, I deliberately chose coins of small size 18-20 mm but of different conductivity - on which I did depth tests in the field at a depth of 40 cm... and also a small 14 mm "Denar" coin - because I have the same coin buried in my test field at a depth of 23 cm ,,,

To compare the range in the airtest, I also used minelab CTX 3030 /program Coin, Deep ,Long ,canal2,sensitivity 25/..on a large 13x17" coil, with which I also compared field depth tests... at a depth of 40 cm, in the field...                   

From the comparison of these two detectors, it is obvious.. that Intronik really has a margin of performance ... and it has a range of more than 40 cm for some of these coins in the air test ... which was also reflected in field tests where 2 gold tested coins were detectable at a depth of 40 cm in the field...

On the contrary, the CTX 3030 could not detect these coins even on a large 13x17" coil... at a depth of 40 cm in a depth test in the field..
The airtest on the CTX 3030 practically confirmed that it is impossible... because the reach of these coins in the air is only 32 to 34.5 centimeters,,,

 

[EL NINO77]

Since Aka INTRONIK has in its groud probe the measurement of mineralization and conductivity of the terrain, I took advantage of this possibility and made a measurement of the terrain of my Test  Field ....

 

[Alexnov]

On 22.10.2024 at 21:22, EL NINO77 said:

 

AKA INTRONIK ... Я думаю, что не у многих людей есть возможность попробовать этот детектор ... Поскольку я недавно приобрёл металлодетектор Aka Intronik... даже с тремя разными катушками: 13-дюймовой катушкой 2a14Kzh, 13-дюймовой катушкой 5a40 кГц и 9x12-дюймовой катушкой 7-60 кГц... это катушки, которые работают с разными частотными парами, и будет интересно сравнить возможности металлодетектора с каждой из этих катушек... для целей с низкой, средней и высокой проводимостью...

Уже после первых испытаний у меня возникло ощущение, что у металлоискателя большой потенциал глубины на моём испытательном полигоне... и он может легко обнаруживать цели, которые я закапывал в землю... очень глубоко для размера данной цели...

Вот почему я протестировал Aka Intronik в испытательном полигоне... где я сделал шаги длиной 40, 44 и 50 сантиметров...

Для начала сравнения я перечислю опции Intronik в программе 2 «Стандарт» с заводскими настройками в AirTest, чтобы вы могли сравнить их со своими детекторами... катушка 9x12 дюймов, 7 и 60 кГц.

Для этого я намеренно выбрал монеты небольшого размера 18-20 мм, но с разной проводимостью, с помощью которых я проводил глубинные тесты в полевых условиях на глубине 40 см... а также маленькую монету «Денарий» 14 мм, потому что такая же монета закопана в моём тестовом поле на глубине 23 см.

Чтобы сравнить дальность обнаружения в воздухе, я также использовал minelab CTX 3030 /программа Coin, Deep, Long, канал 2, чувствительность 25/... на большой катушке 13x17 дюймов, с помощью которой я также сравнивал результаты полевых испытаний... на глубине 40 см в поле...

Из сравнения этих двух детекторов очевидно, что... у Intronik действительно есть запас прочности... и он имеет радиус действия более 40 см для некоторых из этих монет в воздушном тесте... что также было отражено в полевых испытаниях, где 2 монеты, прошедшие проверку на золото, были обнаружены на глубине 40 см в полевых условиях...

Напротив, CTX 3030 не смог обнаружить эти монеты даже на большой катушке 13x17 дюймов... на глубине 40 см при проверке на глубине в полевых условиях.
Проверка в воздухе на CTX 3030 практически подтвердила, что это невозможно... потому что радиус действия этих монет в воздухе составляет всего от 32 до 34,5 сантиметров.

 

You have not successfully chosen an opponent to compare with the Intronik. The 3030 will work in a complex granite with high mineralization or in seawater, ...It will be very difficult for Itronics in these conditions. When testing in a pit or by air, the Intronicus will be deeper than all the devices in the world, but in a real search, everything may turn out differently. Success.

[George Kinsey]

Sadly, the owner of AKA recently passed away.

[EL NINO77]

9 hours ago, Alexnov said:

You have not successfully chosen an opponent to compare with the Intronik. The 3030 will work in a complex granite with high mineralization or in seawater, ...It will be very difficult for Itronics in these conditions. When testing in a pit or by air, the Intronicus will be deeper than all the devices in the world, but in a real search, everything may turn out differently. Success.

This is a very good reminder for CTX,,,but it also works the other way around... I was on complex terrains for more than 2000 years of civilization... and my colleagues and I did tests where neither Etrac, nor CTX3030, nor even Equinox 800 worked well on various programs,, and many other detectors had a deep advantage there... and Intronik really stands out..

test video...

I don't underestimate any detector I own.. but I try to find its real advantages in a given type of detection as well as its detection disadvantages, for example in a different type of terrain or a different type of detection.....

 

One more thing needs to be said here... Intronika's programs use different levels of reactivity, that's why I gave the Intronika test on program 2 "Standard" which will work on different types of terrain...
in the case of more mineralized Terrain, I would recommend the 4-"Fast" program, which uses a higher degree of reactivity and will work better in more extreme conditions...
And on the contrary, in milder and moderately difficult mineralized conditions, we can use program 3 "Deep", which is even deeper than program 2 "Standart".

Also, each of the programs has a setting for the speed of the program /speed/ for me, speed4 works best, as well as separate settings for the Gain and sensitivity of the detector... so you can really adapt each program to the possibilities of the given terrain.

Since I have the opportunity to use several different test fields /and differently mineralized/ of my colleagues ... I will be able to determine exactly what type of program and what setting is optimal for the given terrain..

[JCR]

Is that ground Alkali or some type of Mineralization?

[EL NINO77]

9 hours ago, JCR said:

Is that ground Alkali or some type of Mineralization?

it is a complex terrain, alkaline type of calcareous soil, with deposits of ash and ceramics, hot rock, and also a piece of small iron,,, and a fairly high content of salt... -which dampens the detection signal and reduces the depth of detection...
An important piece of information is that the low detector ground-reactivity filter also works well here... so relatively low-set reactivity detectors... allows you to achieve the best deep results...
in any case, it's a complicated terrain... because not every detector here can achieve a really sufficient depth of detection..
In the test, 50 eurocent... and Roma AS coins were used, stored at a depth of 32 cm...and some detectors had a problem detecting it /Minelabs/...and that's actually the point,, if I hadn't tested it myself, I would have had a hard time believing it..
 But it is the case that field conditions can have a strong influence on the given detector...

It should also be said here that for the AKA Intronik, the 32 centimeter depth for coins was not the depth limit... but it can detect these coins much deeper..

..On my lightly mineralized Test field, I have a 50 euro cent buried at a depth of 39 centimeters ... and Etrac and Ctx 3030 and Equinox800 can detect it as a deep signal, or as a signal at the limit of detection ... but it is still signaled there ... so it would pass I'm still working here OK...

[vicente]

El 24/10/2024 a las 19:55, EL NINO77 dijo:

Este es un muy buen recordatorio para CTX,,,pero también funciona al revés... Estuve en terrenos complejos durante más de 2000 años de civilización... y mis colegas y yo hicimos pruebas donde ni Etrac, ni CTX3030, ni siquiera Equinox 800 funcionaron bien en varios programas, y muchos otros detectores tenían una gran ventaja allí... e Intronik realmente se destaca.

vídeo de prueba...

No subestimo ningún detector que posea... pero trato de encontrar sus ventajas reales en un tipo determinado de detección, así como sus desventajas de detección, por ejemplo, en un tipo diferente de terreno o en un tipo diferente de detección...

 

Hay que decir una cosa más aquí... Los programas de Intronika utilizan diferentes niveles de reactividad, por eso di la prueba de Intronika en el programa 2 "Estándar" que funcionará en diferentes tipos de terreno...
en el caso de un terreno más mineralizado, recomendaría el programa 4-"Fast", que utiliza un mayor grado de reactividad y funcionará mejor en condiciones más extremas...
Y por el contrario, en condiciones mineralizadas más suaves y moderadamente difíciles, podemos usar el programa 3 "Deep", que es incluso más profundo que el programa 2 "Standard".

Además, cada uno de los programas tiene una configuración para la velocidad del programa /speed/ para mí, speed4 funciona mejor, así como configuraciones separadas para la ganancia y la sensibilidad del detector... para que realmente puedas adaptar cada programa a las posibilidades del terreno dado.

Ya que tengo la oportunidad de usar varios campos de prueba diferentes /y mineralizados de manera diferente/ de mis colegas... Podré determinar exactamente qué tipo de programa y qué configuración es óptima para el terreno dado.

the operators looks very beautiful specially the ball man!!