Jump to content

Recommended Posts


That's a lot of money. 🤑

May be that is what the sales manager of nexus thought....: 🤣

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Nexus 3D test ...can be for example ... an example for standardizing 3D testing... which is not a bad idea... because it allows you to change the position of iron as well as coins precisely...
I always nod positively to some step with a measure towards standardizing such testing...

such testing will give you a basic idea of what the tested detector can do..

As Steve says ... finally the testing needs to be confirmed in the field... because difficult terrain can weaken the signal of the coin and strengthen the signal of iron... or in some cases even give deeper buried iron as a non-ferrous target......

I also have my own test field.. a really old field that is laid out with stones on which there is a lot of iron and among it a few masked good targets..../.. which are not plowed,, and which only I detect...,, where it is really difficult to find a good non-ferrous signal.. and where such a signal can mean a really good target.

 

For me, one of the ideal terrains for testing.. because I have full control over this terrain,,and also because I've gone through it with several top detectors for a total of about 200 hours.....Atrex several coils, XP ORX 9"hf coil, Equinox800 11" and 6" coil, and finally I detect the terrain from VERSA..

I was in the field 2 days ago... to check the capabilities of the detector I'm using /and new 24DD coil/... and I recorded videos from the testing...

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iron in the field around dig up coins..old up to 2000 years old forged large and small iron..is very unpleasant in this field...it often gives a good non-ferrous signal...so another art is to identify and choose the really right signals..

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, EL NINO77 said:

Nexus 3D test ...can be for example ... an example for standardizing 3D testing... which is not a bad idea... because it allows you to change the position of iron as well as coins precisely...
I always nod positively to some step with a measure towards standardizing such testing...

such testing will give you a basic idea of what the tested detector can do..

As Steve says ... finally the testing needs to be confirmed in the field... because difficult terrain can weaken the signal of the coin and strengthen the signal of iron... or in some cases even give deeper buried iron as a non-ferrous target......

I also have my own test field.. a really old field that is laid out with stones on which there is a lot of iron and among it a few masked good targets..../.. which are not plowed,, and which only I detect...,, where it is really difficult to find a good non-ferrous signal.. and where such a signal can mean a really good target.

 

 

For me, one of the ideal terrains for testing.. because I have full control over this terrain,,and also because I've gone through it with several top detectors for a total of about 200 hours.....Atrex several coils, XP ORX 9"hf coil, Equinox800 11" and 6" coil, and finally I detect the terrain from VERSA..

I was in the field 2 days ago... to check the capabilities of the detector I'm using /and new 24DD coil/... and I recorded videos from the testing...

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iron in the field around dig up coins..old up to 2000 years old forged large and small iron..is very unpleasant in this field...it often gives a good non-ferrous signal...so another art is to identify and choose the really right signals..

 

 

 

 

 

 

After watching your videos.  I’m asking Santa for the new 24DD coil for Xmas, as I really like the sharpness of the sound from it!  Thanks for sharing those videos with us. 

  • Like 2

Many of my Red Dirt relic sites are similar. The ground is unplowed and the Iron is old & has a solid connection with the ground. The small iron is very falsey and it is difficult to discern good signals. Even high Iron Filter settings do not really help tame the falses.  You just go slow & listen carefully for that little extra something in the sound. Everything left is small & not a high conductor. Once the iron is dug up it does not false. Very challenging.

  • Like 2
On 12/8/2024 at 8:59 PM, bigtim1973 said:

How many 3D  targets do people actually dig?

 

Never really heard of the 3D stuff as it seems to be a relatively new problem.

I thought all targets were in 3D. Unless we only look at surface targets. IDK.

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, Johnnysalami1957 said:

I thought all targets were in 3D. Unless we only look at surface targets. IDK.

Well, I thought 3D was on a movie screen...I thought we lived in a 5 or 6 dimension plane though.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

I recommend everyone ..to find time and do a few 3D tests... because it's not just about the test result itself...it also shows you the complexity of such separation...but mainly this 3D test shows you how to work with the coil for such detection.

In this test .. where there are 2 2.5" nails on the surface and a small 15mm coin at a depth of 7cm  ... you will see what the possibilities of the given detector and coil are..

 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...