Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Ron, that was a really enjoyable read. Thanks for posting!

 

I have read this statement in the GPZ-7000 manual, Bruce Candys paper on zero voltage transmission, and now your write up.

”…has the same advantage of CW metal detector technologies compared to PI for detecting very large nuggets because ZVT is CW (unlike PI that is not CW)”

can you elaborate on this? 

  • Like 2
  • The title was changed to Some Notes on Bruce Candy (Minelab) Legacy Pulse Induction/ZVT Technology Advancements 30 Years

Hi Zephyr,

Great question!

VLF sinewave detectors have a major disadvantage in having to ground balance out all of the soil signals simultaneously ( all three soil components X, VRM and saline).

PI metal detectors have a major advantage of not even detecting the major soil signal; the X component, but only the saline component, but this is mostly insignificant, and the VRM component. This makes the capability of PI technology to ground balance far more accurate than VLF Detectors.

A disadvantage of PI is its lesser ability to detect very small nuggets compared to VLF detectors. Another disadvantage of PI is its capability at detecting very large nuggets compared to CW metal detectors, such as ZVT. CW means Continuous Wave and includes all technologies that do no not have zero transmit periods (almost all technologies other than PI) (Candy 2015).

ZVT CW has the sensitivity close to a VLF but the ground handling of a PI, best of both technologies combined. Ron

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Right on Ron,

I guess I should have clarified more so what I was asking, is the advantage of the CW In detecting larger nuggets over that of the  PI because it’s not limited by the pulse duration not being long enough to “excite” a large target? 

So is this saying a VLF (being CW) in ground that is non-mineralized would detect a very large object better than a PI set to a long duration like Sharp or Normal? 

  • Like 1
14 minutes ago, Zephyr said:

is the advantage of the CW In detecting larger nuggets over that of the  PI because it’s not limited by the pulse duration not being long enough to “excite” a large target? 

 ZVT & CW (Zero Voltage Transmission & Continuous Wave) utilizing the transmit and receive signal simultaneously about all the time twice that of a PI which in comparison is transmitting about half the time and receiving for the other half of the time. 
 

Zephyr,

I would think since the CW transmit signal is twice that of PI that it would punch pretty deep, probably like you said similar to a VLF in benign soils.

Ron

  • Like 1
  • The topic was pinned
  • 7 months later...
On 2/5/2025 at 6:16 PM, RONS DETECTORS MINELAB said:

"Figure 2 depicts

Where's figure 2?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...