Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lots of good info here.

Not to take off on a different direction from the 7000 or 6000, at the beginning of the thread Gerry asked "do you know your detector well enough..." Many years ago I attended one of his trainings. I was using a goldbug ll. Although most had a minelab 3500. It was hammered home at the training to listen for the weak / subtle signals. Also the signal should be repeatable from different directions. At the end of the second day I found a good signal but in only one direction. The discriminate mode gave an odd click noise. Not a great target , probably trash but being a newbie didn't want to walk away and miss something. A small picker, my second piece of gold came out of the small hole. I've always remembered that.

How about ify signals on the gpx series? Anyone have info on those?

  • Like 3

39 minutes ago, Lost Scout said:

How about ify signals on the gpx series? Anyone have info on those?

I have wondered the same myself LS, and I suspect that much of what Gerry has discussed above would also apply. As soon as I read Gerry's excellent post it reminded me of something I bookmarked some time ago from the Minelab site.

 https://www.minelab.com/anzea/community/treasure-talk/the-halo-effect-when-nugget-hunting

And the funny (or tragic) thing is, I've had the disappearing signal thing drive me nuts a couple of times in the past and I have just back-filled the hole and walked, assuming it was just a "clay dome". Also, in my early days of learning about my 5000 I used to think that I had to hear a distinct signal rather than just a change in the threshold. Luckily I don't rely on detecting for a living, as I would have died from hunger long ago 😄

 

  • Like 2
20 minutes ago, TheDeepseeker said:

I have wondered the same myself LS, and I suspect that much of what Gerry has discussed above would also apply. As soon as I read Gerry's excellent post it reminded me of something I bookmarked some time ago from the Minelab site.

 https://www.minelab.com/anzea/community/treasure-talk/the-halo-effect-when-nugget-hunting

And the funny (or tragic) thing is, I've had the disappearing signal thing drive me nuts a couple of times in the past and I have just back-filled the hole and walked, assuming it was just a "clay dome". Also, in my early days of learning about my 5000 I used to think that I had to hear a distinct signal rather than just a change in the threshold. Luckily I don't rely on detecting for a living, as I would have died from hunger long ago 😄

 

Yea one my common mistakes on ify signals is I forget to re-ground balance.

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Jonathan Porter said:

I would not recommend this method. No matter the mode, Semi Auto, Auto or Manual, when triggering QT always have the ferrite present. The tracker that tracks X is VERY slow, so if using Auto you should use QT over the ferrite and then when you go detecting the X balance will remain reasonably constant or slowly drift away dependant on ground conditions (conductive is the worst for throwing X out in Auto mode). If X is present in the soils the X tracker usually does a good job of things, but if there is conductive present as well things can get ugly, hence why I always use Semi-Auto so I can lock the X to the electronics temp which hardly alters once warm. Conductive is almost always present regardless of the mineralisation levels, and is often confused with mineralisation.

So to reiterate, if you are triggering Quick-Trak whip out the Ferrite and use that at the same time otherwise don’t use QT and just pump the coil slowly and let the tracker do its thing, in Manual key your User button to the GB menu and go to either Auto or Semi-Auto to achieve a GB without using QT. The moment you trigger QT the X balance will hit warp speed expecting to grab onto whatever X signal is present, if there’s no X then it might try to extract its readings from the conductive instead, not a problem in zero X ground from then on but the moment you hit some X then Xspurt mode will engage. 😂 (you liked my little pun? X being the unknown and spurt being directly related to conductive signals 😝).

If the X balance is out badly in ground with zero X then there’s no issue (it can’t make a signal if there’s no X present), however if X is out and X is present then there will be extra ground signal that will in turn do harm to edge of detection with unwanted unnecessary signals.

Hope this helps
JP

Many thanks. JP, really appreciate your insights. I have a long word document where I extracted your excellent comments/tutorials that you made about the Z on DP over the years. Your last post is making a great addition, and I hope it won't be the last chapter 🙂

Best,

GC

  • Like 2

Norvic - When the 7 1st came out, it was pretty easy.  I also feel the same way with the 6 at 1st release.  heck, our 1st time training a group at Rye Patch, NV with the GPX-6000, it seemed as if little picker nuggets were in every direction.  But as you know, those days are behind us and we need to learn the "Fine Tuning/Tricks" to squeak out a few more nuggies.  The really deep ones and or larger ones that flip the signal response are the toughest. Still to this day, I'm learning these detectors as there are so many variables that are out of our control.

Northeast - Got it and thanks for pointing that out as I can easily miss a thing or two, kind of like those really iffy sounds.

JP - I just realized it after you circled.  The chart showing HY at 50 gram and under, is also when in Factory Preset Difficult.  As you pointed out, we have leaned towards HY and Normal for most of our recoveries.

I also thank you for sharing the way you Ground Balance the 7000 and when/how you use the ferrite ring.  Since it never came with one when 7 was first introduced and I had success, I really never adapted to it.  Your words of wisdom ahs me desiring to start using it.  Heck, one extra nugget find is worth it.

Mountaineer Matt - Yes, that's exactly why I decide to take the time to write this up.  I know so many of us have habits and I too used to only scrape 2 to 4" and then make decision.  Luckily, I went with my gut and kept go down.  Glad to see you desiring to get even better results.  That's what this forum is about, sharing.

  • Like 4

I'm trying to keep up @Gerry in Idaho!

you might need to give me a beginners handicap 😁

Screenshot_20250316_202057_Chrome.thumb.jpg.e7df60c27b492861407c14497a134516.jpg20250316_165306.thumb.jpg.8c372d674eeb6839a77d4871a01b059c.jpg

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1

Lead Detector - You most certainly are.  That's a very impressive discovery. Well earned,

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...