Hi Steve, likewise I have joined here to get out of the politic,s I have been involved in the QED test team for five years as an interested prospector and sounding board having NO pecuniary interests through many versions of hardware and software revisions it still has more to give with further development with input from the new owners of the production detectors most of my testing has been about its ability to handle various types of ground from super saturated salt lakes to ground of around 70% iron content mainly with DSO attached looking at wave forms although I have found gold with it that was not what the main target was now I intend to use it for the designed use as Reg being in my early 70's the light weight ergonomics is a boon my prototype is slightly different from Reg's having again a slightly different layout but the same component count and software.
Qed
in Metal Detector Advice & Comparisons
Posted
Hi Steve, likewise I have joined here to get out of the politic,s I have been involved in the QED test team for five years as an interested prospector and sounding board having NO pecuniary interests through many versions of hardware and software revisions it still has more to give with further development with input from the new owners of the production detectors most of my testing has been about its ability to handle various types of ground from super saturated salt lakes to ground of around 70% iron content mainly with DSO attached looking at wave forms although I have found gold with it that was not what the main target was now I intend to use it for the designed use as Reg being in my early 70's the light weight ergonomics is a boon my prototype is slightly different from Reg's having again a slightly different layout but the same component count and software.
Regards, Ian.