Jump to content

1911Colt

Full Member
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by 1911Colt

  1. On 10/17/2018 at 3:11 AM, SteelPhase said:

    Ok I cant give away all the secrets but if I could completely eliminate the issue of ground noise I'd be rich. 

    The sP01 will enhance a little ground noise. Unfortunately thats the nature of the beast but because it will enhance those deep faint signals, you can back the gain/sensitivity off a little which will quiet the machine with regard to ground noise, without loosing any relative depth. You can also run higher smoothing/ lower stabilizer.

    So is it safe to say the SP01 takes signals that are likely target signals and specifically amplifies only (or mostly) them?

  2. 7 minutes ago, Steve Herschbach said:

    A GPX with stock coil can hit a U.S. nickel alone to about 16-17”. I would estimate 2-3 feet to be fairly easy but it depends a lot on how the coins are packed in the jar, orientation, and whether it has a metal lid. Nuggets weighing multi ounces but far smaller than a jar are found at depths exceeding two feet with a GPX.

    My favorite “large” coil for a GPX was the Nugget Finder 18” round mono, but with over 100 compatible coils having been made the choice is vast.

    Bang for the buck is the GPX 4500 but the 5000 if money is no object is still in many ways the most powerful general purpose PI device on the market. For your use though the 4500 would probably be the way to go.

    Thank you sir, I greatly appreciate your insight, anyone can have an opinion, but what you gave is insight.  As far as if it had a metal lid or cap, say iron, would this affect the way the GPX detects it?

  3. 8 minutes ago, Steve Herschbach said:

    Used them myself also. They simply find what they find and won't what they don't. Treasure hunters have used them for decades and so this is not even an open question. However, If you don't want to use a two box get a Minelab PI with a large coil.

    What kind of depth do you think a Minelab PI would get on a coin cache jar?  And as for coils, which would you recommend for this kind of hunt?

  4. 5 minutes ago, Steve Herschbach said:

    Used them myself also. They simply find what they find and won't what they don't. Treasure hunters have used them for decades and so this is not even an open question. However, If you don't want to use a two box get a Minelab PI with a large coil.

    Yeah, what I mean is for caches of coins, the depth is miserable on them, all the literature makes them sound good but once you have one in hand you see they are poor performers, unless its a very large object

  5. Thanks for the replies, as for the White's, I forgot to mention, I took a TM-600 and also a TM-800 up there looking, after no results, I tested them on buried targets, those machines are also nearly worthless, wouldn't even find a bundle of copper pipes at 3 feet deep, and even more worthless on a jar of coins.  People say yeah 2 box for deep stuff, but in reality, unless you're talking about a steel drum or something similar, these won't find anything.

  6. Hey, I'm new here, but I come here time to time to read, you all are a knowledgeable bunch it seems.  I have for a couple years been on the search for an alleged cache of gold coins, in a jar or something similar. It's a solid story, I've done my research, etc.  I am currently looking into a GPX 4500 for the hunt. I had bought a CTX 3030 and learned it for a few months, but I buried some test targets (using bottles of nickels, or pennies), and the damned thing was nearly worthless past 12" deep, a $2500 toy in my opinion.  Most caches are said to be found at 1 1/2 to 2 feet deep, and I'd say 3 feet wouldn't be out of the question here.  Any informed opinions welcome, thank you!

×
×
  • Create New...