lauchon03

Hace 6 minutos, alaskaseeker dijo:

Piense en actualizar al Minelab Gold Monster 1000 ...

GOld monster has more depth than equinox 800?

Hi guys, my name is Cristian, I'm from Argentina, my detector is a Garret AT Gold, I use it to search for gold nuggets in the Andes mountain range. I have very good results with very small, tiny nuggets, but I think I'm losing some depth, I compared it to the Garrett AT Max and apparently it has a little more depth but not so much sensitivity to small nuggets. I want to change the AT Gold for another detector that gains depth in larger gold (2gr, 5gr, 10gr etc).
Do you offer me minelab equinox 800, makro gold kruzer, goldmaster 24K, xp orx, which recommend me to have greater depth in large or acceptable nuggets and not lose much effectiveness in small nuggets?
I found the gold nugget in my hand with the AT MAX at 20-25cm, with the AT GOLD I had no signal
I leave some photos to see the gold that took out the AT gold. regards

p / d: sorry for my english, I used google: D

Hi guys, my name is Cristian, I'm from Argentina, my detector is a Garret AT Gold, I use it to search for gold nuggets in the Andes mountain range. I have very good results with very small, tiny nuggets, but I think I'm losing some depth, I compared it to the Garrett AT Max and apparently it has a little more depth but not so much sensitivity to small nuggets. I want to change the AT Gold for another detector that gains depth in larger gold (2gr, 5gr, 10gr etc).
Do you offer me minelab equinox 800, makro gold kruzer, goldmaster 24K, xp orx, which recommend me to have greater depth in large or acceptable nuggets and not lose much effectiveness in small nuggets?
I found the gold nugget in my hand with the AT MAX at 20-25cm, with the AT GOLD I had no signal
I leave some photos to see the gold that took out the AT gold. regards

p / d: sorry for my english, I used google: D