Jump to content

benzyoc

Full Member
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by benzyoc

  1. My understanding of the area is this. 

     

    Odd sections are owned by the railroad. Even sections are BLM/public. However I hear some of the blm land sold and so did the railroad land  

    Big mining company "XX_mining etc "  buys up claims and sells/leases them on ebay or other sites. Rinse and repeat. 

     

    Basically. If it's marked stay off unless you have permission. 

    I suggest learning to prospect before getting a claim. No point in owing a claim if you can't get the gold. Or use the LR2000 find out who owns section 19&17 lease the land and run everyone off! Then detect for a year to find a few nuggets lol. 

     

    Years  ago I heard a story about a guy that bought a claim at rye patch.   Spent a bunch of money on equipment, etc. pushed large areas with his tractor. Didn't find very much. He convinced himself that "everyone" took all his gold. He left broke. But b4 he did he threw thousands of BBs all over his diggings. 

     

     

    • Like 1
  2. It's very easy to get access to a majority of the claims at rye patch. I would start with buying a pizza. It's a good place to meet new people and learn about prospecting. If you come across anyone that actually spent time near your claims buy then a beer and pick their brain. Almost everyone is friendly and loves to tell stories. 

     

    Good of luck and find a fatty!

  3. 5 minutes ago, Rail Dawg said:

    Every claim in Sections 08, 18, 20, 24 and 30 I know are fully claimed.  

    The odd-numbered sections are privately owned and Nevada Law does not require owners to post No Trespassing signs.  

    We as prospectors are obligated to find areas that aren’t claimed or privately owned.  

    To not do so earns one the title of Claim-Jumper or Trespasser.  

    MyLandMatters.org is a great place to do research as is LR2000.

     

    Spreading misinformation helps no one.

    Being a land owner in NV I am well aware of the trespassing laws. 

    I posted the actual law. Long story short, if it's not posted by a few different means . It's not trespassing.

     

    NRS 207.200 Unlawful trespass upon land; warning against trespassing.

    1. Unless a greater penalty is provided pursuant to NRS 200.603, any person who, under circumstances not amounting to a burglary:

    (a) Goes upon the land or into any building of another with intent to vex or annoy the owner or occupant thereof, or to commit any unlawful act; or

    (b) Willfully goes or remains upon any land or in any building after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass,

    is guilty of a misdemeanor. The meaning of this subsection is not limited by subsections 2 and 4.

    2. A sufficient warning against trespassing, within the meaning of this section, is given by any of the following methods:

    (a) If the land is used for agricultural purposes or for herding or grazing livestock, by painting with fluorescent orange paint:

    (1) Not less than 50 square inches of the exterior portion of a structure or natural object or the top 12 inches of the exterior portion of a post, whether made of wood, metal or other material, at:

    (c) Fencing the area; or

    (d) By the owner or occupant of the land or building making an oral or written demand to any guest to vacate the land or building.

    3. It is prima facie evidence of trespass for any person to be found on private or public property which is posted or fenced as provided in subsection 2 without lawful business with the owner or occupant of the property.

    4. An entryman on land under the laws of the United States is an owner within the meaning of this section.

  4. 40 minutes ago, Rail Dawg said:

    I think Section 19 is owned by Newmont Mining.

    I'll do a quick search and find out although they did own it for years or have the lease on it.

    Have spoke with them recently and they insist they don't want trespassers on their property mainly for liability reasons.

    I'm friends with many claim owners out there and we keep an eye on each other.

    I must admit if you steal one game camera it would be funny to have the other cameras catch that lol.

    No worries we're all prospectors.

    Don't claim-jump and don't trespass I think we'll all get along just fine don't you?

    Tresspassers on their land?  In Nevada which is a open range state if you don't want people on your land you put a fence up or post no trespassing signs. The lack of signs and fences speaks volumes. 

     

    Owning a claim I'd different from leasing claim or owning the land. 

     

    For example. If you claim a BLM section you own the mineral rights but the land is public. Citizens can use that land like any other public land. They just can't take the minerals you claimed. 

  5. 4 minutes ago, LukeJ said:

    I'm not sure how it would be illegal to take a picture of someone's license plate.

    Unless I'm misunderstanding something, it's the law enforcement officials that 'run the plates'.  I'm pretty sure they do so when a crime, like mineral trespass has been committed.  The pictures of the license plates and the pictures of the illegal mining are used as evidence in charging criminals with a crime.

     

    Citizens running plates is a crime. Law enforcement is a different story. Law enforcement wouldn't just give a citizens phone numbers of other citizens based on pictures. But we all know this. 

    Clearly mark the claims. People will stay off. 

    • Like 1
  6. If the claims are clearly and properly marked I doubt many people will chance jumping on to a claim especially one like section 18. Section 19 has plenty of detectable gold and it's not claimed. Also Dan kindly offers his GOOD claims to anyone for 20 bucks a day. 

    A simple google search shows that " running plates" is illegal. So if your running plates I wouldn't advertise that. None of the land is marked no trespassing. Owning a claim is different from owing the land. 

    Also so if I see a game camera laying around on on unmarked land it's going in my backpack. 

    Best solution is to clearly mark your claims. I doubt many people are interested claim jumping the sections you have. 

    Make friends with the local people. 

    You catch more flys with honey.

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  7. There's hardly any flex. I get a extra 6 inches. Gives me a nice wide swing and it keeps that coil away from all the metal on me. I never understood why minelab made the length so short. But I used the extra long lower shaft from doc on all my gpxs so maybe I'm just use to it. 

    • Like 2
  8. Thanks Rick for the awesome story. We had a ton of fun. Whenever anyone tells you "there's no more gold at rye patch" remember ricks story. Three guys detected a total of one day and got almost a ounce. Plenty of gold left. I can wait to get back. I'll be fighting the heat 4th of July weekend. Hope I find another fatty!

    IMG_1164.JPG

    • Like 8
  9. I do not know the inner workings of the tracking system. Just my opinion but I always want to use the minimum ground balance needed to get the job done. Ground balance is just ground discrimination. Eliminating a ground signal carries with it the risk of eliminating a gold signal that looks similar to the detector. Needlessly eliminating responses that the actual ground does not produce would in my opinion be counterproductive.

    This is exactly how I feel. When I  dig hot rocks or those patches of old burnt roots at rye patch I know my detector is running HOT. Thats how I like it.

     

    Settings

     

    General

    Normal

    Fixed tracking

    Low smoothing

    Gain 11-15 depending on noise.

     

     

     

    I dont find the tiny tiny shallow stuff like high yield does. But i find those deep deep 1 grammars no problem.

    • Like 2
  10. This update scares :o me. I have a few questions if anyone can help.

    Does this ferrite bead just dumb down the machine sensitivity so it runs quieter?

    Is minelab just over ground balancing the machine to make it run smooth? Kinda like ground balancing on a nugget, you just track it out.

    Has there been any testing on actual sensitivity vs the old version?

    My concern is that minelab has made the machine less sensitive to make it more stable. The noise doesn't bother me one bit. I have no problem picking out the super faint targets through the ground noise. I read about people doing crazy things like not running threshold and such to make the machine stable.

    The 40% claim I fell is correct. But there is a lot that goes into it. Its all about listening to what the detector is telling you.

×
×
  • Create New...