- Popular Post
-
Posts
1,087 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Detector Prospector Home
Detector Database
Downloads
Posts posted by Jonathan Porter
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Been a while since I posted to this thread, this year has been good for me on the gold front with some nice finds. Theses pics are of some of the pieces I found during testing of the NF coil, I’m now at liberty to show them off on this thread. I’ll be posting up a fair few more pics of gold finds once I get the thread revived. I’ll also include some pictures of what the locations look like as this is sorely lacking this day and age due to secrecy.
This thread is not meant to be political, just sharing some of my gold finds for others to enjoy.
JP
Fern leaf gold, sold this one for AU $150 per gram
Nice solid 9+ gram piece found deep on the edge of this gully
-
16
-
The latest ZSearch coil I’m using is an MTR unit (Manufacturing Trial Run) and is a clone of the coil sent to ML for validation. It makes sense to then let a few people have a play to confirm my own experiences, who better than a wide mix of people from our customer base, both experienced and inexperienced GPZ operators. So far the feedback has been very positive.
The orange stick is a ferrite assist stick we used to supply for ferrite balancing the GPZ held onto the shaft by clamps, since the inception of Semi-Auto GB mode the frequency required for ferrite balancing has reduced immeasurably, negating the need to carry it around with you.
Hope this helps
JP-
3
-
-
On 11/20/2020 at 10:16 AM, phrunt said:
I wish we had big surface gold like that
The 22 gram piece wasn’t surface gold?, it was at approx 12 inches in super noisy variable soils. The worse the ground the less the depth you achieve. In this case the nugget was an easy find because it was in a super awkward location in amongst prickle bushes, the lighter coil, quieter operation and smaller size allowed for him to detect there. (Smaller means less salt signal)
Newbie customer from FB finds in only a few hours after the training session
Some bits and pieces I’ve found recently on old patches
Friends finds from yesterdays session in super hot variable ground
Vicky was customer who bought a GPZ based on the weight saving of the ZSearch coil, her first nugget was this 8 gram piece with the test coil on one of my training patches (thrashed). They are eagerly waiting for the release.
-
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
14 hours ago, Reg Wilson said:I sold the GPZ because is was overweight and overpriced, and just a bit over hyped. The electronics were pretty good after the bugs were sorted out, but just lazy design. Instead of a light weight prospectors tool, we copped a converted military monster with not much more than a colour change. Then to add insult to injury we were informed that to operate it properly it was advised that one had to use both hands (cripple stick) like a line trimmer, and go 'low and slow' ( due to very slow target response). Not my idea of a user friendly detector.
The SDC2300 was another example of lazy design, and once more a colour change from military green to blue. Dodgy battery contacts, laughable headphone jack, ridiculous 'knuckle' coil arrangement and limited to small targets as it was originally designed to find tiny wiring in ceramic mines. Even if you could put a large coil on the thing its depth on large targets would be poor due to the fact that its internals were designed for small bits of metal.
Coiltek have a test site just out of Maryborough in Central Victoria with a number of simulated nuggets of various size and depth. The SDC could barely pick up the smallest target only, whereas the QED could pick them all up. (witnessed)
The next time you are in Victoria Jonathon bring your SDC and a pocket full of hundreds, and we'll visit the test site for a comparison. Bring your ex prison guard mate with you as well. I'd love to take his money.
Not trying to put the boot in Reg as I see there been a few responses to your post but some of the things you’ve said are just plain wrong and need correcting.
The GPZ housing is based on the CTX 3030 which is a unique original design, no military carry over there and as has been said, the SDC although using the same housing as the F3 Compact, has unique electronics that were built from the ground up for a specific purpose. I know all this because I was on the ground floor during its development. I agree about the battery contacts of the SDC which was somewhat corrected in the later times with the supply of NiMh C cells with bigger contact points and just lately the inclusion of a slip in Lithium battery (due to world demand and shortages ML cannot supply at present so have reverted back to the NiMh for the time being). The SDC was developed to compete with the Garret ATX which has very good sensitivity to small nuggets, the SDC has proven to be an all time favourite for people who detect occasionally and do not want to get all bedazzled with complex menu and switch systems, its a perfect newbie detector that has amazing sensitivity even in the worst of environs.
Reg I did some of the first prototype testing with the SDC in Victoria out the back of Tarnagulla on Italian lead, there is some pretty nasty highly variable high X ground in the upper part of the lead especially in and amongst the surfacing areas, I was gob smacked at the amount of missed targets I found all over those diggings with many many small nuggets just sitting for the taking. It was on those diggings that I helped ML perfect the MPF timings for the SDC, I’ll never forget the work because it was early in the season and the March flies were prolific, huge big blood sucking monsters in their millions.
Lastly the complaint about the slow response of the GPZ 7000, I find this comment amazing because anyone worth their salt (pun intended) both in the coin and relic world and also the serious prospecting world knows a fast response equals less depth! On the ML coin machines its called recovery, on the GPX machines its called Motion and on the GPZ its called Ground Smoothing. All are filters that allow the faster movement of the coil relative to a target which is handy if two targets are side by side on a coin machine, on something like the Equinox it is also handy to help handle conductive/Salt ground because of the higher frequencies of the Multi IQ tech. Salt signal is directly proportional to coil swing speed, so the worse it is the slower you should swing the coil, applying a Ground Smoothing filter like “patch or Salty” on the GPZ helps cut back on the salt signal but kills depth.
Test beds have their place but entirely too much time is spent fretting about a non-gold target buried in a bank of a creek somewhere. So much can depend on the operator and the settings used and more especially their understanding of the best way to actually swing the coil of the detector being tested, so many people do not fully gasp the importance of the correct ‘Range of Motion” relative to a deep target on the GPZ, its not so much about speed as getting the actual coil movement distance correct to get the target signal to fully manifest and become recognisable from background noise.
Hope this helps someone out there
JP-
14
-
1
-
6 hours ago, Reg Wilson said:
I guess a 'turn on and go' detector suits some that can't manage a more sophisticated machine. A poor operator will always blame the tools.
Is that why you sold your GPZ Reg? ?
-
3
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, jrbeatty said:
............Good to see those faulty X coils still delivering the goods. Well done Rick! ?
OK I’ll bite, if a Minelab GPZ control box or coil didn’t Ferrite balance they would be considered “faulty” and replaced, this is not to say the coils mentioned are no good just not optimal. Clearly they find good gold, this constant jibing and digging just for the sake of it has grown very thin, if X balancing wasn’t needed then it wouldn’t be provided in the menu and a calibration tool would not be in the box.
In this day and age witnessing a nice haul like this is great to see and I congratulate Rick on his successes. Also great to see Davsgold posting again, sending my best wishes to him on a speedy and full recovery.
JP
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, Lanny said:
Yes Jonathan, for those of us that spend 90% of our time detecting in mountains, the weight of the heavy Minelabs really is a killer.
I'm with Steve on looking forward to someone that will come out with a top-notch much-lighter-weight machine that will do a comparable (or better) job to the heavy Minelabs. I can only dream about detecting in flat areas because our gold is mountain bred and often requires hanging on by the toes while swinging a coil.
If Minelab gets the weight down considerably and it truly offers something remarkably different in their new 6000 model, I'll take a look, if not, I'll look somewhere else.
All the best,
Lanny
Lanny I assure you I too dream of the perfect lightweight form factor detector that has the performance we’ve all become accustomed to since ML released its first PI back in 1995. Hopefully new ML detectors coming out will follow the Equinox 800 which eloquently combines both desires/needs.?
JP
-
7
-
-
- Popular Post
Should have been included from when it was first released, I pushed hard for it and got ignored.? In variable ground it is a God send, soon as the zero threshold becomes threshold like (ground response becomes more dominant and is breaking into the dead zone threshold position) it’s a simple matter of hold in and pump for a few seconds till quiet. This now allows you to run a more aggressive sensitivity level in hot ground and then keep on the GB grab as soon as the GB starts to drift.
Using the AUTO sensitivity modes it is also very handy, I used to find the sensitivity would degrade if the GB went out of whack and it would then take too long for the GB to recover without doing a power cycle, now just Grab the GB again and keep walking.
The Monster is now a well rounded metal detector and up there with the all-time VLF greats. Not good news for early adopters but good to see Minelab were willing to make the changes.
JP
Note: In salty/conductive ground pumping the coil might not always be the best option (conductive signal can be exacerbated by lifting the coil away from the ground), in this scenario hold in the GB grab and sweep side to side instead.
-
13
-
6 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:
It’s a forum and speculating, suppositions, and guess work about new products is a large part of the show. Like Simon notes I don’t know that you follow it JP, but the same thing goes on and always has with every new product by every manufacturer.......
Anyway, I’m sorry it all stresses you out so much JP. The reality for me as forum owner is I will continue to encourage early information and posting about it here, for the express purpose of stirring up speculation, suppositions, and guess work!
I'm not stressed Steve, you assume that I am.?
I avoid posting here these days because of exactly what's just happened, open house for everyone to say and imply what they please but anything I say that might provide some balance or a differing view always seems to trigger a strong emotional misinterpretation of what it is I'm actually saying.
Thanks for reminding me it's YOUR forum.....again.?
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
23 hours ago, jasong said:
Only irrelevant if you have some kind of information we don't.
Otherwise, right now all the factual information we were given is the "12 inch" from the website and "330 mm" from their photo, so those sizes are specifically relevant.
It's been 12" on their website for quite some time. The new info we have now is the photo with 330mm. That is info provided by Nuggetfinder or a dealer themselves, not guesses.
So, unless you have inside information then what you are doing is guessing about changes. Which you seem to take exception to others doing.
The irony is that the bit about the NDA's combined with the lack of denial that you are testing these coils is written with an apparent intention to make people guess that you are in fact testing these coils, or at least guess that you know something more than we do about them. While we just got chastised for guessing, we are in the same reply almost encouraged to guess again.
No offense intended man, just a strange chain to read and try to make sense out of.
This is why I don’t post much here anymore?, being constantly fine tooth combed, my NDA comments were in regard to GPX rumour threads etc. I haven’t looked at the NF website for a fair while and noticed they expressly say 12” which is quite a detailed number, whereas all the photographs I’ve seen show the coil in a lot of different guises, so I think I’m right to take all pictures with a grain of salt, this also coincides with the couple of variants I have actually tried but am not inclined to discuss for the exact above reasons. ?
Not trying to rub anything in anyone’s faces just that until you either actually hold a finished coil in your hand, or see the dealers with one or sight the dealers order list it’s still in development, why they keep putting teasers out there is anyone’s guess but I’d say it’s because of COVID19!!
This is the last I will post on this subject until more concrete information gets released, members can read between the lines all they like, I for one am done for now!!
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 8/28/2020 at 7:00 AM, phrunt said:
It's like every new product thread JP, it happens ? You clearly don't read the VLF threads like the Apex ? It's been a long wait, and we are nearing the end of the wait now! By the sounds you didn't get to test these NF coils ? I thought you would have been. I guess NF will be as disappointed as everyone about the pushed out release date, detecting mostly taking place in winter right and the coil coming out towards the end of the cooler months.
It is what it is, I’m used to Product Development pathways and the hurdles that get in the way of finishing dates. I spend the bulk of my time trouble shooting issues that flair up, these can be very time consuming to isolate and sometimes require a redesign, it what it is and I’d rather things be held up and done right than quality/performance be compromised.
Simon I dabble in lots of things to do with gold detectors and hardware etc and especially with Minelab am bound by NDA’s. ? Since my last visit I see NF have updated their website and have specifically mentioned 12”, so until I actually receive a price list and a date when stock will be available I will be considering everything I read and hear to be very fluid and open to change.JP
-
3
-
-
32 minutes ago, phrunt said:
Does anyone on the forum have plans of buying the
12 inch13 inch NF? I would be interested to hear their opinion of it vs the stock coil especially on small targets. I was intending to get one as I wanted to compare it to my current 12" but 12" is about as big as I'd want to use and even that is pushing it. I've had good finds with my 12" really tiny stuff. The 13" is getting a bit too big for me to outlay the money, I've only used my stock coil once it was just too big when I had smaller options. I know its a big ask if anyone who has the current 12" is going to get one to do a comparison so anyone getting one will do. I recall you saying you were planning on getting one jasong, is this still the case? I think I even told my dealer to get me one, I best contact him and change that if I did. It's been that long since it happened.Simon your post’s are full of baits and triggers, I get that your balancing the books but until there’s actually a coil available to do a comparison there is little point to constantly jibing away, I say this with all due respect.? This is a little like the GPX 6000 thread, full of supposition and guess work, based on very little factual information.
The main thing for me is the Z search coils from NF will be lighter and plug and play offering massive peace of mind, that alone makes it worth the wait, I for one wish they were doing a larger coil first. Till the dealers are actually told there is stock available the sizes being proposed are irrelevant, in the past when I was doing testing for them I often saw Nugget Finder make big changes to coils and design techniques almost overnight, thats the beauty of having a small factory, they can quickly make changes to designs right up to the last minute.
I’d say the real reason why the coil has been delayed so much is the massive demand since COVID, our shop has struggled all season to get stock from all of our suppliers, it is maddening to have a shop in the middle of the busy season with huge demand with no stock, no coils, no picks and no detectors!! It’s been that crazy!! Every dealer in Australia has this issue right now, getting Nugget Finder EVO coils has been extremely hit and miss for the last 3 months.
JP
-
7
-
-
Gosh that is some steep country, no wonder the GPZ is a struggle over there, even lugging it in on your shoulder would be hard work. I‘m definitely the wrong build for mountainous country like that and so is the GPZ!! ? Really pretty gold and pretty views, more so because of all the hard work required to get it, well done you deserve every gram and more.?
JPPic of one of the more mountainous regions I’ve worked over the years (Pilbara area WA on a 40 degree C day so was laying in the shade of my quad having lunch)
-
4
-
1
-
-
I suppose I take it for granted that for me performance in our ground comes before price and historically even ergonomics. The ATX is a good example of this where it really struggles because of our mineralisation and to achieve performance the sensitivity has to be lifted a lot to get a signal response on the smaller SDC like gold, once you lift the sensitivity the other flaws like touch sensitivity come to the fore making it a very hard detector to use, this makes things very difficult for new chums trying to learn the art before frustration kicks in.
Obviously ergonomics are extremely important also, as as you have said Minelab have demonstrated they can build a really nice metal detector in the form of the NOX800.
Watching the FT story with interest.
JP
-
4
-
-
Good ergonomics are vital to comfortable detecting. Overall weight is a weird one, for instance I find the GPZ really nicely balanced in flat terrain but can understand how people in steep areas would suffer terribly, I also prefer the weight to help maintain a good range of motion control over deep edge of detection signal responses, this controlled ranged of motion is especially important for a DOD coil design as they are a slow coil by nature, good control also helps in avoiding saturation signals. One thing that does drive me nuts with the GPZ is the delay in the menu button pressing, absolutely slow as a wet weekend. Seriously it’s Commodore 64 on dial up slow, its so slow it actually hurts my brain thinking about changing a setting, press button, think, think, think.... think some more then a tiny bit more then as your about to give up and try again chirp!!!??
I also find the SDC a nightmare to use because of the left right swivel knuckle and general klunkyness, yet they sell like hot cakes both new and second hand?, an all time ergonomic Frankenstein nightmare that just keeps on going and going, our hire machines cop an absolute pounding year after year yet step up time and again begging for more!!?
Time will tell on what ML are actually offering, the usual catalyst for what people are willing to pay is the results from the early adopters, a price tag as described suggests ML are confident in what they are doing.
Steve I’m interested in the Impulse too, is there a release date announced at all? (I’ll go click on your link so this question might be silly)
JP
-
7
-
-
Kind of feels wasted on YouTube, a quality piece like this should be on prime time. Steve such a pleasure to see my good friend again, reminds of the wonderful time we spent together chasing gold in WA.
An absolute beautiful piece of gold worthy of the good guy who found it, well done to all involved I enjoyed every minute of it.?
JP
PS LOVED the clunk. ?
-
1
-
1
-
-
I have tried the dual WM12 and find they are always slightly out of sync with each other, only slightly but enough to annoy my hearing. Also I found one would drop packets while the other didn’t which drove me nuts, the reason is one unit is mounted across from the detector and your body blocks the signal at times causing the drop outs.
The SP booster is excellent with headphones but IMHO is not real good with speakers especially if your hearing is a little off, having to use the inbuilt volume control of the GPZ can help but the volume jumps are too coarse so things get gritty very quickly.
Question: Are you using Audio Smoothing OFF?
To get more audio presence try using Sensitivity 9, Audio Smoothing OFF, Ground Balance Semi-Auto, Threshold 27, Volume 12 for WM12 speaker, 8 for B&Z with speakers or a bit higher with the SP. When lowering the Audio Smoothing filter (Noise floor is OFF) the overall volume of the detector increases as you open up the noise floor of the detector, I see a lot of people going the other way because they do not like too much feedback from the detector and then have to increase volume and sensitivity to compensate, which is kind of like robbing Peter to pay Paul (no pun intended)?.
Hope this helps
JP
-
2
-
-
Been a while since I added to this thread, travel restrictions have eased so I did the trek south to go see my Mum who’s been in lockdown and not seen a soul since this all started (she in a high risk group at 80 years young). Since returning home the shop has prevented me getting out much so only a couple of sessions over the last week or so, thankfully the good thing about gold is it doesn’t rust.?
JP
Some of the nasty ground I’ve been working (holes will be refilled)
Few pickers I got just on dark
Yesterday morning’s session with a bonus chunkster ?
-
7
-
-
1 hour ago, phrunt said:
The GPZ even with it's plastic housing is much better for EMI than the GPX, I have to be right at the power lines to be bothered.
Like I said the bulk of the EMI is coming in via the coil, the shielding on the GPX control box is already VERY good thanks to the aluminium extrusion, but the overall electronics are not as refined as the GPZ hence the big difference in the 2 around the high Voltage Power lines in your area. The power lines also gather and channel a heck of a lot of Sferic noise which the GPX machines are very susceptible to, Sferic noise is all the garbled non-rhythm like sounds, fences and telephone cables are notorious for channeling this stuff, the longer the line the greater the effect.
The Booster should put out very little EMI unless it is right up against the control box, far less than a mobile phone for instance. I know the B&Z puts out nil anyway.
JP
-
3
-
-
5 hours ago, flakmagnet said:
Wait, so the plastic housing on the gpz isn't doing much to hold down EMI…
interesting. What kinds of advice did he relate (if you don't mind my asking).
I am into anything that will hold back EMI.The GPZ is pretty immune to EMI from a circuit design POV, however the plastic housings will allow a certain amount of EMI in if the boards are not shielded well, you can see this with a GPZ using a mobile phone, just run the phone past the housing along the sides especially when the phones transmitter is ramping up due to low signal, the SDC is also bad for this. However this is from a localised concentrated source and why you should keep your mobile phone away from the control box (some Bluetooth transmitters will do this as well).
Most EMI that affects detectors gets in through the coil which is a far more sensitive to the weaker long distant EMI such as 50/60 Hz and Sferics type EMI, the control box is not really affected by this unless your extremely close and then the coil noise will swamp the control box noise anyway.
If you think the GPZ control box is allowing EMI in then maybe line your cover with foil but be aware too much might be seen by the coil and kill depth, one of the reasons why I’m not a fan of aluminium enclosures especially ones mounted separately from the control box.
JP
-
1
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, Aureous said:
I dunno how long this 'consignment' GPZ arrangement with dealers has been going on, but what does consignment deals and free coils say to you, the potential buyer??? It says to me... 'Run out all the stock coz something new is coming'. I was in a dealers showroom a few days ago and a guy wanted to trade-in a 5000 on a 7000. The seller was advised to wait a few weeks 'coz ya might regret it'. I'll leave that for you all to ponder.....
Bad advice I’d say.?
GPZ’s have been on consignment since day dot.
-
I do not get excited about the lower priced coin and relic machines because there is just not enough margin relative to the time we spend on customers and the volume we can achieve in a small population centre, we do move a reasonable amount of Equinox but have to discount to remain competitive. TBH I have no issue with the chain stores stocking these items because for ML to make money out of them they need to sell volumes which cannot happen with shops like ours set up for more personable engagements.
JP
-
4
-
Jp’s Gold Thread
in Detector Prospector Forum
Posted
Some pics of my now sold crystalline collection.
JP
Palmer River Crystal piece I found many years ago
Enrichment piece, not crystalline but beautiful