Jump to content

Redz

Full Member
  • Posts

    202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Redz

  1. 19 minutes ago, phrunt said:

    I doubt it's the battery, I think it's the short cable vs a big long sucker of a curly cable. 

    In my set up I replaced the stock battery with lithium added a separate amplifier, but kept the cord. Removal of the stock battery had a large impact, because the amplifier in the battery causes a lot of emi. I had the same curly cord for both set ups. The other improvement is the amplifier in the battery insn't great. Using an aftermarket one improves the experience a lot.

  2. 12 hours ago, phrunt said:

    Another simple cheap mod for the GPX series is this interference shield, it's cheap, acts as a protective cover keeping your GPX looking new and I genuinely believe has made a difference to my 4500 and 500

    Combine this with an EMI filter and change out the amplifier (which is very susceptible to emi) on the stock battery for a lithium battery with amplifier, and you can run much higher gain and much higher stabilizer = much more depth sensitivity

  3. 20 hours ago, jasong said:

    I use them primarily for bedrock cracks that can be 2"+ deep or where I have to chisel through hard stuff like caliche, to save time/chiseling.

    I use them for this too. Surely, however, a deeper pinpointer may be less productive as it will sound off on nuggets further away from all sides. I.e. less precise

  4. The 5000 can find coins jewelry and relics at great depth. That is why they are used on the east coast of the US. They are not as good at discriminating between targets, so if there is a lot of trash you will dig a lot of it. It really shines in ignoring high mineralization in the ground, which is critical for gold nuggets. I would reflect on what you really want to spend most of your time doing, and if this is your first detector have realistic expectations - many spend a long time finding their first gold as before they are successful they have to learn where the gold is going to be. If the place is hunted out, or there were no big nuggets to start with, detector choice is not going to matter much. Location matters.

  5. If your main objective is nugget gold, then a PI detector will serve you well, and the gpx 5000 is a great detector for finding gold. There is a learning curve on how to use it, however, so keep reading the manual and the forum guides. There are more recent detectors that have less of a learning curve perhaps, and find smaller gold, but they are much more expensive. Be sure to check your detector is an authentic gpx 5000 by checking the serial number on the minelab website.

  6. Gpx 5000 you can use 7.4v 8000 mah lithium. Is lightweight, plus you get much less emi.

    The remote control vehicle ones work well. Goldhound had a good post on this but I cant find it.

    There are many makes but they are like this

    https://www.amazon.com/HOOVO-Connector-Helicopter-Airplane-Quadcopter/dp/B07V5FZV2M/ref=mp_s_a_1_5?crid=N6PH1RPB8I3M&keywords=2s+traxxas+lipo+battery+10000mah+7.4v&qid=1683904030&sprefix=2s+tracxas+lipo+battery+10000+mah+7.4v%2Caps%2C225&sr=8-5

  7. I get tired of seeing this every couple of years. I have never known gold replenish except fly specs. I agree it is the 100 to 500 year flood when the water is 20-30 feet above normal that really has a chance of moving gold. The only real bonanza is removal of overburden making new areas accessible.

  8. Fartraveller,

    It may help a little to know what state you are considering. From your references/tools used you are in the southwest US correct? But there are a bunch of states that have 6000+ elevation.

    I am with Norvic - hunt ground where there are no big mines, more chance of nothing, but more chance of untouched spots. They are still there- old timers didnt have detectors, and older detectors cant handle ground modern ones can. Geology map will show the right ground

×
×
  • Create New...