Jump to content

taras777

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

taras777's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (2/6)

  1. Minelab 540 is better than equinox? I don't think so .... because 540 is a lower level. i'm stopping at nocta skore 2. if i have time to search further, i'll buy a spectrum 3 from whites. this metal detector finds coins 60 cm in the ground. i watched a test, but the company is no longer there. you can find a used one.
  2. As for the terra, I think they are not up to par, and they will be worse on heavy soils.
  3. Thank you all for your experience and advice. i am also inclined to nocta. today i called a colleague who is professionally engaged in devices in Ukraine. he sells them and tests them immediately. he said that nocta score 2 would be an ideal option for my soil. it is a little bit of a cut down legend but for me i think it is enough. In Germany, many people have switched to Nocta. I was a little skeptical of the Turkish manufacturer, but now I am sure that I will buy this device. first of all, it is the price-quality and 3-year warranty and positive reviews. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
  4. Thanks Jeff, I'm thinking about a nocta or equinox score 2 or minelab 600. i don't know what will be better, i've only worked with garets, i'm more inclined to nocta, almost everywhere positive reviews. i think they will be somewhere on the same level, although i heard that minelab 800 or 600 is delicate, about nocta they write that the device is well assembled and successful, carbon, easy to operate, it's just what i need. i see that many people sell minelabs for some reason. Mostly 800 and 600, or change to newer ones or switch to other devices. deus is a good device, but I tend to be more inclined to nocta. maybe in the future as a deep device I would take another Whites spectra v3i, it's a really good device, but difficult to set up, I watched a coin test in the ground, 60 cm in black soil. I think this is the deepest coin test of all the devices I know, but the company has long been defunct, and the device can be bought used. so while a new nocta or 600 mi
  5. Thank you for your informative answer and advice .I understand. then I choose most likely either nocta or equinox. maybe someone has a nocta score 2? read a review for it today. a gold coin of 10 rubles in the ground sees 27-28 cm. this is a very good indicator, maybe someone can confirm its performance that you have. about the Ukrainian chernozem, it is loose and black soil in some places with peat, in such land significantly increases the performance for the better. As for the deus, it seems to me that it is complicated and very noisy and will be more expensive. I think it will be better to equinox 600, it is now inexpensive in Europe for about 500 euros or nocta score 2? also the price is about 500 euros. I will choose from these two most likely, I also looked at the legend, but it is a little more expensive and it is not known whether there is a difference between them.
  6. I have been digging since 2007, in Ukraine the soils were completely different, black soil. in the forest there is only sand, having moved to Germany, everything is completely different here. I went mainly with garettes, it's like a Kalashnikov machine gun, turned on and went. now I want to try something new and better, then it turns out either nocta or equinox. then I choose something from this. thanks for the informative answer.
  7. and why the distrust to fischer f 75 ltd? it costs 400 if I'm not mistaken. it seems a good price for a professional device. i would take two. fischer and minelab but now i need one for now, so to speak...
  8. Gareth, I don't want to, I think they are shallow, do you like minelab? what's wrong with terra? nocta legend also looked at, but the company itself for some reason rejects. either minelab or fisher. maybe it's better to take 600 minelab? they are now cheaper .
  9. what kind of device are we talking about? and what options do you offer? i am more inclined to f75 because it was the leader in its line, but minelab also has its advantages, the main thing in the device is stability, depth and ease of use. thanks
  10. Hello everyone. i am facing a choice which is better. Fischer f 75 LTD or black, and is there a difference between them, I heard that there is a new firmware, or minelab x terra pro as an option or the same equinox 600. all the time I went with garrett, but it seems to me that they are shallow. budget 600-700 dollars. I looked at the nocta simplex, but still fisher and minelab is a well-known brand with a name. advise what will be better. my soils are heavy, European, namely Germany, Bavaria. in some places clay. stones. sand. thanks in advance for the tip. sincerely Taras
×
×
  • Create New...