Jump to content

Redz

Full Member
  • Posts

    205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Redz

  1. If you look under a x10 or x20 loupe the brown is probably host limonite that the gold occurred with.

    My guess in your situation the gold is travelling downward as there is not huge water flow. The other material travels around the gold and rounds the edges. The source is  close but probably not the decomposed rock layer unless you can see quartz or similar ore.

    However these are just generalizations as I dont know the ground you are in.

    • Thanks 1
  2. If it was really that easy, why does minelab spend millions on R&D, if a guy in his garage can come up with a competitive detector? If there were such garage geniuses lying around, why would they not be multimillionaires already? It is just not plausible, and IMHO frankly lacks a little humility

  3. 20 hours ago, Clay Diggins said:

    lode deposit has been discovered within the boundaries of the placer claim. In that situation the new lode claim replaces the placer claim within the lode claim's boundaries.

    Just curious why you would pay to file a new claim over ground you already hold the rights to? The placer claim would allow you to prove the lode. Only reason I can see is if you are developping a subsurface mine

  4. 5 minutes ago, phrunt said:

    Now the big question hanging over it is benefits outside of prospecting with its Target Id's, how beneficial is that going to be in parkland and beach settings, for me so far, it's looking good.

    A second big question is how useful this will be in really trashy areas of the motherlode. It has potential here to do what more expensive machines cannot

  5. I just use a SwissGear 1651 City Pack. They are narrow and small to maintain mobility, but carry 3L bladder and fit my pinpointer scoop, tools, emergency equipment etc. It has been pretty comfortable on long trips, and best of all it is 40-50 USD. I also dont like big bags that carry too much (as then I take too much I dont need).

    image.thumb.jpeg.d29a20209dc59d90ca89391d1674994b.jpeg

  6. 6 minutes ago, phrunt said:

    You keep bringing up EMI shielding, what exactly do you mean by this? what are you doing for this shielding? 

    I use the shield you mention (thanks Aureous) plus Woody's emi filter. Biggest noticable effect was switching from stock battery to aftermarket lithium, and getting rid of the amplifier in the stock battery. That seemed to introduce a lot of noise.

    After that I was able to run gain of 19 stabilizer 14 in most conditions, which was simply not possible before

  7. 44 minutes ago, Lost Scout said:

    I get the newer coils but is the amplifier that much more of an advantage?

    Amplifier allows you to lower the threshold on the detector controls, but then amplify with the external amplifier. The effect of this is you can use a much lower threshold but still hear it clearly, and boost the quiet signals that were hidden by threshold to be audible. When combined with emi shielding you can also lift the stabilizer so you hear much smaller signals. The overall effect of this is much greater sensitivity to small signals. In effect you are running the dector using settings you previously could not hear. The amplifier quality is also much better than the one in the stock battery.

    In my experience it allowed me to go over ground and hear deeper nuggets. But ask the australians, they all use amplifiers

×
×
  • Create New...