Jump to content

AU_Solitude

Full Member
  • Posts

    320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by AU_Solitude

  1. 46 minutes ago, Paulito said:

    Quartz crystal chunk? Should look really sweet if most, even some, of those are crystals protruding off! 

    Yes, the picture doesn't really do it justice at the moment. Protruding quartz crystals are about finger sized and there is a whole mess of smaller ones in the voids along with some unidentified crystallization. I have to get rid of a lot of iron and manganese to bring everything to light. 

  2. Had to get out with the GB for a few hours this morning - had what I would normally have passed over as a hot rock signal, however I was in a place where hot rocks were few and far between... I believe it was all the iron in the pocket setting the GB off. This one should look nice after an acid bath. 

    DSC_0501.JPG

  3. When I lived in Wyoming I actually spent a lot of time looking for Indian artifacts and have a pretty good collection - I'd detect old homesteads but had yet to be bit by the prospecting bug. 

    Last year I stumbled across a very nice multiple pocket stringer of large quartz crystals while out for gold - as soon as the snow runs off at higher elevations here this spring I need to go hike back in and dig them out. I have a few here I need to grab some pictures of and I'll post. 

  4. 5 hours ago, raugaj said:

    I have had some sucess finding nuggets with a Fisher Gold Bug Pro but recently went out with  a friend who has a Minelab 5000. He was easily picking up nuggets where the GB gave no indication at all. I realised I needed something better but was not sure what would be appropriate.  The 5000 is rather large and heavy for carrying a long distance and is complicated compared with the GB Is there any recommendation as to a detector that is significantly better than the GB but has its lightweight features and ease of use? I suppose the Minelab 7000 would be even less likely to meet my needs.?I am not very fit and only get out gold detecting a few times a year.

    I think that your last line kind of sums it up; if you're only getting out a few times a year does it make sense for you to spend a lot of money on a PI unit?  Only you can make that decision, and everyone has differing amounts of income to sink into nugget detecting, but It sounds like you're doing well enough with your GB already. All detectors have a learning curve and there is no one turn on and go detector that's probably going to meet your needs. You can have the fanciest arsenal of detectors but if you're not putting the time in to connect with your machine I wouldn't be expecting miraculous results. Nugget shooting isn't easy or everyone would be doing it. Best of luck in your endeavors. 

  5. Not sure which detector of Vallon's you're inquiring about, and I'm not Steve, but having used Vallon, Ceia, Schiebel and other various mine detectors, I can tell you they are essentially of no use on native gold. If you are a relic hunter they might be fun, but zero discrimination and you'll be digging pin size targets all day long. The only mine detectors to date that performed reasonably well on gold were the minelab F1A4's. The Minelab F3C will hit gram and larger nuggets but at mediocre depths. For gold it's best to stick with gold specific machinery. I will add that while these mil-spec units usually come in extremely durable configurations, they are usually very cumbersome as a result. No free lunches. 

  6. 8 minutes ago, fredmason said:

    10 million is a lot of money. However at 5000 a detector it would only take 400 gpz's to recover the cost. Assuming my math is correct and my guess at what they sell to dealers for is anywhere in the ballpark.

    I am very happy Minelab stepped up!

    fred

    I believe your math is a little off, granted your wholesale is probably in the ballpark. Something else to consider is that I'm sure they didn't stop selling Z's the second they broke even.

  7. I haven't made the leap for a Z yet as I just don't get out enough to justify the expenditure. My primary machine has been my SDC and it does well in most of the shallow haunts that I hunt...absolutely love the song it sings.  I also have a GB Pro that I use in trashier locations and as a backup. Both of these detectors fit nicely in a decent size backpack which I love!

  8. 5 hours ago, RickUK said:

     

    I have a TDI Pro machine and as mentioned above i use it solely for hoard hunting,would i have bought a 'sl' version the reply would be no way,the horrible 'S' shaped shaft and because of the limited battery life i would almost certainly go and buy a competitors machines,price does not really come int the equation but usability does and the 'sl' for the most part is neither a top pro nugget machine or infact it also lacks on beach use as well because its not waterproof,so folks do tend to go more for the added bonus of being waterproof in a wet enviroment just incase they drop the machine in the surf.

    I have used an SL and actually like the S-shaft - matter of opinion there. Other than that, I believe everyone else seems to be on the same page. 

×
×
  • Create New...