Jump to content

AU_Solitude

Full Member
  • Posts

    320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by AU_Solitude

  1. Beav_Can has a good point; pretty much every pulse induction detector I have used has been affected by cellphones to some degree - it's a good idea to disable Wifi & Bluetooth and put it as far away from your detector (back pocket or backpack) as possible IF  you have to have it on at all. 

    Whether it was GB, interference, or a combination of both, it's good to hear you have it working! :smile:

  2. The performance reports rolling in seem less than stellar on the quest pro. The package is nice as it looks like it could break down to a very small footprint for use in the field. It may not be a negative for everyone, however, the built in rechargeable lithium battery is a big negative to me.

    Iv'e heard good things about their pinpointers which is how I believe Deteknix got their start.

  3. I've had no trouble with mine with a lot of hours on it now (although digging handfuls of little birdshot is annoying.) 

    Minelab has great customer service,  if you are having trouble with your unit send it in for service and they'll fix it. No manufacturer is immune to production anomalies and quirks, I can't think of a detector manufacturer that I haven't had a little issue with. 

  4. On 3/16/2016 at 5:02 PM, DDancer said:

    Uhm, you guys should realize the SXRF technology works on X-rays and as an inherent result only works on surface samples.  It does not penetrate very deeply, about 2 microns, and can not give deep survey result.  This is why a powdered/pulverized sample is required and the window for sample is very limited *about 2 millimeters* with the sample window Pressed against the sample.... 

    Its very expensive at this point in time to microminiaturize such a device beyond its current limits however its a very precise machine.  Read up on it as you can.  As a prospectors device it is most prohibitive.  I think this device is a small as can be had just now. And probably in the future as well.

    It doesn't need to be any smaller and the fact that its penetration is limited doesn't negate its usefulness as a tool. For mine exploration, yes, it would be a fantastic tool to have at your disposal. Would it be practical for a weekend prospector/miner? No, for this you are correct in saying it would be prohibitive. 

     

    Also, I don't believe that it is required to have the sample powdered or pulverized with current technology. The model I was able to test was here - check it out if you like.

    http://www.thermoscientific.com/en/product/niton-xl3t-goldd-xrf-analyzer.html

×
×
  • Create New...