raziel900

I really don't understand why people want to search for those tiny gold nuggets with the Deus 2, a VLF machine....there are other metal detectors suitable for this purpose, XP can't go crazy to "fix" its update giving the possibility of hitting those tiny gold nuggets in ultra-mineralized soils...the Deus was not designed for this use!

can you link the update page? is the list of changes visible? i cant find anything about the new update

How big is the coil? How wide? How long?

Is this notion valid for all multi-frequency metal detectors?

do you know the dimensions of the new coil? at what frequencies does it operate?

Can I ask you what it has to do with raising the bottlecap in mineralized soils? Isn't that setting just for bottle caps?

from your videos we can understand that the deus 2 in multifrequency uses two main frequencies, and that the various programs setting the same frequencies are all the same... except for some like general and sens ft...bhaa

what do you mean??

program number 3 with the aggressive silencer (even at 0) is the least suitable to create a base to unmask targets in the middle of the iron, following the logic I would have taken as a basis the program number 2, this is to say that logic is worth nothing in this hobby, things must be tried... And that's what I did in a medieval site full of iron and modern garbage, guys to my amazement I have to say that he unmasked some very small coins in the middle of that hell,I only changed the discrimination to 35 because some small coins sounded at 38-40 and the iron volume to 7....I was amazed and I must say that it works very well and if it works very well in a land with ancient bricks, iron of all sizes and modern garbage I think it will be good everywhere! ps: i'm on 1.1 version

Are there any advantages to lowering discrimination (-6.4)? It's the main question of this topic, we discussed it before. I'll give an example because I don't understand what you mean, a non-ferrous target with Tid 70 in a mineralized soil is masked with Tid 7 (ferrous zone) if we have discrimination at 10 that target sounds like a ferrous ok? Now, if in that context we have discrimination at 5, that target sounds like "good" but always with TID 7, right? Or do you mean that by lowering the discrimination that target with "drugged" Tid 7 turns into a Tid close to the real 70 so that coming out of the iron ladder?

I'm referring to Paystreak's video, in fact even in other videos he explains that in his highly mineralized soil the high reactivity offers more "depth" in that soil if it lowers the reactivity the target sounds like iron.

In Paystreak's video it is the highly mineralized soil that allows it to be drilled better with high reactivity.... Could you use negative discrimination in that context? It would only lead to confusion without any advantage

Totally agree with all of you, even if there is no news about it at least not in the videos on youtube, now I understand the meaning of negative discrimination even if in practice I can't imagine how a borderline target could sound better with negative discrimination. Surely we Europeans have different terrains and targets from those who live in the United States for example

Can you tell us more about how negative discrimination can help? in unmasking or in deep targets?