Good morning, Northeast. Thank you for your help.
I was looking at the SDC 2300, it's more like a smaller nugget, now the GPX 5000 goes deeper and has several coils for this model.
As the device graph shows, the GPX 5000 takes second place compared to the GPZ 7000.
https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/imagens/WnTPph0
Looking at the graph, you can see that the SDC 2300 gains in smaller nuggets of up to 5 grams down. Now when it goes to medium nuggets of 10 to 50 grams the GPX 5000 already gives a boost, and when it goes to nuggets of 100 grams the 5000 with the 15x12 coiltec coil takes almost half of the GPX 7000.
https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/imagens/8Dgb_kY
Now, in this other graph, the GPX 5000 has one star for nuggets and 3 stars for big nuggets. It will only lose to the GPX 6000, this GPX 6000 it has 5 stars for a smaller object and 4 stars for a large object (GOLD), but the GPX 6000 is more than 30 thousand out of the budget.
From the graph, you can see that the GPX 6000 is a complete device, both for smaller nuggets and for large nuggets. While the GPZ 7000 is focused on big nuggets, it has 5 stars for big gold.
Correct me if I'm wrong. I accept criticism.
More was researching and I could see that the 5000 is for Gold Prospecting and Deep Relic. But it does not even show an indicator on the screen if it is ferrous or not, this GPX 5000 it beeps in ferrous stone, how do I know if it is ferrous stone or non-ferrous metal.
Because the GOLD MONSTER 1000 shows it on the screen, when it keeps changing I dig. Now with the 5000 you don't have that option.
I'll have to dig everything like a Polish Pi, I've already found ferrous stone that whistled like non-ferrous metal.