EL NINO77

air test of the Equimox 800 programs for fine gold and silver..fine gold chain1, medium gold chain2,small silver coin parvus 3,gold heart4,gold earings 5.....Test in Sens18...and recovery speed 4...

...the direct rod if it is well balanced - it can not make a problem when it detects .. on the contrary - it can make the detector simple,solid, light and compact..-mi personal  carbon tuning my detectors...-better balanced,solid  and smaller weight..

let me give you a link to one equinox test programs Park1, Park2, Field1, Field 2 :   sensitivity 23, iron bias 1  .-.  in  13:30 minute Change recovery speed 5 to 4 - In Field 2,and Field 1 ..

I ordered a 6 "coil, but the 6X9-10" coil is the best compromise of the excellent sensitivity of very good depth,better separation and weight coil ...

.... over the weekend I switched through my 3 test items is Spectrum V3 with 12x10 and 6x10 sniper coils, tecnetics G2 with 11dd and 13 ultimate, and Rutus Optima with 29CM DD - and I can tell from Equinox that in this test over them reserve even when the Spectra with 12x10 bits takes the best  signal denar and  earrings- for 1F -7.5 khz--the multifrequency  for V3 Spectra its less deph and accuracy  ID in depth as one frequency- this is probably the only  lack of Spectra. Rutus Optima on DD29 also takes a denar and a earrings coil just above the ground but with a good ID - it's a good detector ... Pretty surprised by the tecnetics G2 with the 13 ultimate- taking the denar and the  earrings  a good and stable ID with even a coil a little bit over the ground-normal sweep- is a significant difference compared to the standard 11DD coil-you have already swept the ground to get some occasional positive signal .... what also surprised me on G2 of the 13 final sometimes got the signal also at a .0.05gram -lthough id was at 70 but it was .. -not in vain it's a gold detector .. Wink -this tested detectors were set to maximum sensitivity-but I skipped for sure a little less sensitivity ..- when I sum up the Equinox on sensitivity from 19 and it does not take 2 but all 3  deph test items with exact ID, I see it as it's uniquely great advantage ... 

Yes, ...includes VAT 165.38 euros....and 136.68 euros  ...without VAT-   seller is from the Czech Republic..-,dealer Minelab.... It's just me from Minelab fair price so I see it quite positively ... for  all users Equinox...

I ordered a 6 "Coil on Equinox,
  the price is165.38 euros, I think it's a good price ....
 

.I thought you were responding to Equinox programs so I ... I compared Equinox 800 to 3 buried items: -N2,N5,N6 ....1-AU segment  O  -0.05 gram-in depth 10cm, .... 2.- 14mm denar in depth 23cm ... and 3-13.5mm silver earrings at a depth of 20cm .... Equinox on Park 2, Field 2, Gold1, Gold2 has a signal for all 3 items at ease from sensitivity-19 -23 even with good ID -9,10 -Denar, 9ID- earrings., 1-2 ID Au segment O -0.05 gram.. but surprised me Park1, and Field 1, at sensitivity 20-23,24, -nice signal of Denar and silver earrings with a bit higher ID 11,12-Denar, even at such a depth .... but again on small  AU  segment O-0.05 grams did not respond to the maximum sensitivity 25 ... before I tried to dig up and AU segment O- just for 8cm .. and program park1, field 1 it also did not take away ..... Recovery speed I skipped from 1 to 8 ... good response had recovery 3,4,5,6 - even when the best was -4 ... Wink...

.... multi frequency works very well ....

I tried to use my Equinox 
2000mA powerbank with output 1A-- Off Equinox is charging ... "But on the Equinox turned on and also the charging it probably will not work ....

I gave the surface 2D Yt-test because it shows the other logic and efficiency of coin and iron detector work on a low recovery rate 1  - the coin signal is sufficient long, full and strong, high recovery rate 8 in this case cut signal coins for more times-the detector only sees a smal piece of coin , but the iron signal under the coil is still -strong ...
 

I have the impression that the V3I was using the fast tracking of the ground...,

“A square-wave drive TX produces a triangle-wave current and magnetic field, which produces exponential eddy responses in targets. You can sample the RX response with early/mid/late sample windows and effectively get X and R from this.

In a sequential multifrequency (SMF) where short & long duration TX drives are temporally separated, you can easily use parallel demod channels with proper timing to extract the X & R for the different frequencies. No pre-filtering needed since the responses are not intermixed.

In a concurrent multifrequency (CMF) where short & long duration TX drives are intermixed, the RX signal is bandpass-filtered into each frequency channel for X & R demodulation. Then the signal is closer to a sine wave and can be demodulated using continuous-time methods, exactly the same as a single-frequency design. The White's V3 demonstrated that when the channel filtering isn't good enough, frequency cross-talk makes ground balancing exceptionally difficult. That's why the V3 GB doesn't work as well as it should.  - Carl- Geotech forum..”.     Very much I appreciate the thoughts Carl Moreland ....           CMF multifrekvenci is Spectra V3 ,.....and SMF multifrekvenci  is  EQUINOX... 

the Park2 and Field2 programs on the equinox have a stronger preamp, so you have to find the right sensitivity to the field conditions ....

That's why I wrote 4-5hours of the 12hours of the equinox-it means 33-40% of the useful capacity of the Equinox battery.....,

Equinox on sensitivity 1, see the coin  to 4-5 inches ...

Equinox will charge 40% - 4-5 hours of detector work ...

In this test I used 5 detectors and  tested this 3D test...: 1nd place and Best signal -Equinox 800..., 2nd place  -good signal of the golden mask-9 "spyder and rutus optima DD29 coil,.... 3th place of the Spectra 12x10" detech coil -signal only  in very,very, low sweep  coil....and Teknetic G2 13 "ultimate coil - good signal only 20-25  cm above nails,  less - no signal -nada... is one important thing  !!!: Small and the ellipse of the coil will not go through such a test..!!!..Used coils in test: Equinox-11DDcoil...passed, Golden mask-9"spyder coil passed, Rutus Optima -DD29 passed,and DD23 coil.-no passed..,Whites SpectraV3 -6x4" whites-shooter ,10x6"mars sniper..-no passed and10"dd-whites..,12x10detech  coil- passed ....,Teknetics G2 - nel snake.., 11"dd tek coil. -no passed... .,,and 13" detech ultimate coil.-passed this test.....
 

15cm long nails  and 7cm above  23mm-5gram silver coin-1korona FJ-1893   ,....spacing between the nails is 18cm.....

Yes, it was very nice that Carl explained on the  Dankowski and Geotech forum....
 

...Equinox is compared to Spectra, easily adjustable but perform detector ...Spectra is a University of detection technology ...

25 minutes ago, MarXthespot said:

 EL NINO77.  That is what I was curious to know.

In my environment so far, 2" extra to get a quarter at 14" I would only see to 12" is the sort of variable I can easily weigh in my memory banks.

In my situation, that is a bad tradeoff for the benefits I see from using a higher recovery rate.  Not necessarily true for everyone in all situations, but it is good to know at times and places when it might be a significant gain/benefit.

Unfortunately, I'm out of reactions for the day, so thumbs up to you sir!  

 

...but you have to sweep it slowly - ...- As Steve H. quite rightly remarked, on mineralized land at least 4 or more Recovery speed...So we can say that the correct size of recovery speed is also a marker of terrain mineralization....