Jump to content

Steve Herschbach

Administrator
  • Posts

    19,804
  • Joined

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Steve Herschbach

  1. Hi Darren,

    Welcome to the forum!

    I can only offer an opinion. I think the MXT and V3i are different at a very basic level. I have read about attempts to get the V3i to emulate the MXT and I do not recall anyone ever being totally satisfied with the result. Page 39 of the V3i Owners manual has a program for emulating the MXT but I have not tried it myself. Mixed mode does for me provide that direct "coupling" with the ground and target responses that I enjoy but in a way very different than the MXT. You hear everything and have to hunt very slowly. In too much trash it would be overwhelming. 

    It sounds like you want to get a V3i but I can't honestly recommend getting rid of the MXT hoping the V3i might happily replace it. You say "I had a V3i for a couple years and sold it and went to the MXT and couldn't be happier." There is no reason to doubt that history would not repeat itself.

    Having said that, if you are like me, you probably want one anyway! I am on like my fourth V.

    mxt-program-for-whites-v3i.jpg

     

  2. I deleted a post that advocated exactly what the owners of this mine are trying to avoid - an escalation and extreme confrontation. I am a full supporter of miners and prospectors rights but this forum is set up to avoid political arguments. I welcome informational posts about meeting and issues, but inflammatory rhetoric should be taken to other more appropriate forums.

    Barry did a good synopsis of the situation at http://forums.nuggethunting.com/index.php?/topic/11385-blm-now-after-miners/?p=79470

  3. Keith, it was great meeting you and the rest of the team yesterday! Too bad the weather and my head cold were not cooperating. Thanks for your contributions to the forum, they are appreciated. Now get back out there and find more gold before you have to head home!

  4. That's really great Scott. Welcome to the club and I am glad to hear you are taking to the GPZ. I am discovering that the less a person has used a GPX the easier the transition to the GPZ seems to be. Longtime GPX users try to make the machine work like a GPX and the GPZ despite similarities is a whole different ballgame. Good luck and hope you score some big gold on your outing!

  5. I would like more posts of coin and jewelry finds. The full forum description - Detector Prospector Forum

    A forum dedicated to prospecting for gold and other precious items using metal detectors, suction dredges, sluice boxes, gold pans, and more. Metal detecting for coins, jewelry, relics, meteorites, etc.

    Great job returning a list ring to its owner!

  6. JP has commented a couple times that in his opinion the GPZ with 13"x14" coil gets about the same depth on large nuggets as a GPX 5000 with about an 18" or even 20" mono coil. That tells me if the ground has been hunted hard previously by an operator using a GPX with large coils than there is little chance of the GPZ going any deeper. The solution there will be the larger GPZ coil. However, this assumes the gold is reasonably solid stuff that both machines would do well on. The GPZ has a real and distinct advantage on specimen type gold regardless of the coil used on a GPX.

  7. Little confused on what they're describing in this video.

    The fast walking and swinging is what you do right after you hit the power button? This is for the benefit of the auto-tracking?

    Or is the fast walking and swinging what you do after you go to the quick start menu, do noise canceling then squeeze the quick-track button? The walking and swinging is going on while the quick-track button is being depressed for the initial ground balance required during quick start?

    Maybe I need to go back and re-read my manual. I may have been using my machine wrong...

    Yes, this is the fast walking and swinging what you do after you go to the quick start menu, do noise canceling then squeeze the quick-track button. The walking and swinging is going on while the quick-track button is being depressed for the initial ground balance required during quick start.

    I just tossed the video in to help illustrate JPs blog post that started this thread.

  8. I was a die-hard headphone guy. JP tried to convert me to external speakers in Austrlia but I did not want to do something new on such an important trip. Now that I have converted I wish I had done so sooner. It really is nice being headphone free.

    The only issue is external noise, and you still need headphones around running water or wind in the trees. I am going to check into fitted in the ear phones for those really windy days as headphone earphone cups seem to do as good a job picking up and amplifying wind noise as anything also.

  9. Bonus post by JP with pinpointing tips http://golddetecting.4umer.net/t21485-gpz-my-rating-4-out-of-10-and-thats-being-kind#208623

    I am glad people are finding the information useful. I have to admit in my case I simply am putting in hours detecting with the GPZ. I run at stock settings with just a couple changes and basically just use the Quick Start procedure and go detecting. The machine seems very easy to understand and operate compared to a GPX. People reading all the posts would think the GPZ is far more complicated than I think it is.

  10. I am adding a bit to my answer just for general readership.

    90% of my decades of metal detecting in Alaska I wore headphones. These days I tend towards external speakers. The sound would help alert a bear to your presence, which usually is a good thing. Or would they come to see what's making the funny noise? Don't know, but it is nice to be able to hear what is going on around me.

    How to handle bears in Alaska is Alaskans favorite subject of debate. Many old timers don't carry a gun. Some go nowhere without one. Pistols are great for convenience but all government and business interests looking to protect people use 12ga shotguns. That was my favored choice for many years as a camp weapon. It is more about comfort level than reality in most instances. In a lifetime of traveling from one end of Alaska to the other I never had to kill a bear to save my life.

    I rarely packed a weapon and if I went back up to Alaska tomorrow I would go without. I have sold my bear guns. Be aware if driving no guns allowed through Canada. If I was all that concerned about it I would get a can of bear spray mainly due to logistics. Just easier to get while up there and leave behind if need be. That's just me though - some people feel they need a gun. Again, you have to do whatever makes you comfortable.

    I do know it would be very difficult to have a gun of any size of your body using a GPZ 7000. Even a can of bear spray would be problematic.

    Safety in Bear Country http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=livingwithbears.main

    The issue is just as important in California and elsewhere as in Alaska. Plenty of bears in the western states. They keep eating Chris Ralph's apples!

  11. There is a lot of information about the Gold Bug 2 on this website at https://www.detectorprospector.com/magazine/steves-reviews/fisher-gold-bug-2-nugget-metal-detector/

    Ken has you started. If you get frustrated with ground noises (hot rocks) or trash the iron disc setting will make the detector quieter but less sensitive. Even then the Gold Bug 2 is more sensitive than most detectors.

    There is of course no setting just for gold. Even with the discrimination on you will dig plenty of lead and aluminum and some large steel items.

×
×
  • Create New...