Jump to content

Gerry in Idaho

Full Member
  • Posts

    2,186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    72

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Gerry in Idaho

  1. Even though someone said it was posted to another thread or site, some how I missed it?

    But I feel this videos actually needs it's own post anyway.

    Some of the threads of excitement on the AlgoForce E1500 are multi pages long which is great for retired folks who have all day to read word for word, post for post.  A few folks enjoy skimming and trying to find a nugget and I feel this post and what is shown is a "nugget".

    This may have been brought up before? Did you folks catch the date on the inside of the detector?  It's Sept 2023. 

     

    This machine didn't just pop up over night.  Well done Alex for keeping a good tight lid on it until ready for release.

    How about the comment of the Microphone at the 11 minute 36 sec mark?  "It's listening to you".

    And there is the 13:50 mark of the video and Woody's comments "you can tell they known what they're doing".

    Again, sorry if this is mixed in with one of the long threads but I only have so much time to try and read as much as possible.  You can hang me later, but at least let me get to and read Simon's updates.  I know, I'm a little behind.

    Screenshot_20240210_084333_Samsung Internet.jpg

    • Like 3
  2. Here's the truth about those things.  I can remember seeing ads in treasure magazines with like devices all the way to the 1970's.  Yet all these years later and we never see front cover magazines, news blips or real genuine YouTube videos showing treasures being recovered.

    If, I am not mistaken, a well known big K company in FL that sells all kinds of metal detectors and dreams... used to sell them, until a lawsuit.

    I actually have one.  I use it to find the right metal detector to do real hunts.

    A select few people delusional folks will purchase anything to get rich quick.  The pricing is so high the delusional buyer is convinced it must be real, for pricing alone.

     

    • Like 6
    • Haha 3
  3. 1 hour ago, Ndplumr said:

    Put me down for one of the first AlgoForce 1500's you get in Gerry

    I've been in contact with Alex and he knows me from many yrs of promoting gold detectors and working with previous Engineering.  It's just going to take some time to get them to US.  Hopefully not over a year, like some manufactures.

    • Like 7
    • Oh my! 2
  4. Simon, Your honest and up front raw video, comments and testing is fantastic.

    Not many folks get as excited as you do for so many detectors and or coils.  Your enthusiasm towards helping so many people in finding different tools for the gold hunt is exactly on par with the top few in the US who do the same.  Passion my friend is bleeding through.

    Hopefully my Staff/I will be able to find one some how and get it to well known and hunted out Rye Patch, NV.  I'm keeping an open mind in realizing a USD $1500 GPX-6000 detector is not a USD $6500 PI or even a USD $3400 SDC-2300.  But the added features it provides, the multiple of affordable coil selections and it's ergonomics will shine.  If we find some gold at Rye Patch, then we also know it will shine in other less hunted areas.

    Interestingly, I enjoy hunting specimen gold and especially the kind that many PI's from the past can't see.  Having a detector with it's sensitivity and ID system should be a game changer to the pocketbook.  Just think of how many folks who can now afford a Pulse Induction detector and still have the money to fill the gas tank and go.

    Thanks again my friend.

     

     

     

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
  5. 16 hours ago, Doc said:

    Can you think of the number of times you have to swing an 8 inch compared to a 14 inch.  Makes my arm sore just thinking about it.

    Doc

    Come on now Doc.  I've watched you hunt and you're no Spring Chicken.  Besides, how much ground do you need to cover in a day in that wheelchair?

    You remember those good old days when you could be on your knees in a 10' area for half day (2 to 3 hrs for us old farts) hunt and be grinning ear to ear as you sniped another dink with a small coil on that VLF.

    Pic of my happy customers finds using really small coils.  And they didn't have to walk very far.

    Scott1.thumb.jpg.1b1732af8b5e84b9b6660296174d4f22.jpg

     

    Glasses may be needed.

    Scott3.jpg.40ad240feb91bc840e0d1d4558e6de82.jpg

     

    Any gold no matter the size...is always good for beginner customers.

    WadeGB2NV2014.thumb.jpg.3aeb8d33ea2e024f24d881412f2694d8.jpg

     

    You/I both have many happy customers with their SDC-2300's and small 8" coil.

    SDCLunk1.jpg.4bf26bfa6b4f7ce441cc3eded99c53b8.jpg

     

    And you/I both know this.  It's not how much ground you cover in a day, but how good you cover the ground.

    Going home with any gold...is always better than going home with excuses and an empty kangaroo scrotum bag.

    I think this option of a value priced PI gold detector is going to be a smash...if not, then a splash... and we go back to our overpriced detectors.  At least we are getting options.

    Cheers my friend and good to see you on here again.

    • Like 8
  6. Having a site with 2 gram size nuggets as the average is extremely rare for most of us. 

    It's not a simple answer to your question, as gold density/shape, play into the equation, along with soil conditions and or hot rocks. Then you have to look at the depth of the 2 gram nuggets.  I'm assuming since you know they're averaging 2 grams, you also have an idea of their respective depth recovered?

    As Rob Allison mentioned, the GPX-5000 (discontinued in US), was a very capable detector on solid 2 gram nuggets. It could also be tuned for various soil types and hot rocks better than a GPX-6000.  

    If 2 gram is the average size, I'm expecting a few larger nuggets could be for the taking. If you're familiar with a GPX-5000 and not intimated with the 250X options of sub timings/settings and you're gold is at depth...and you don’t mind owning a model of detector that Minelab will eventually quit servicing? I myself would probably go GPX-5000. You didn't mention, but the new Garrett Axiom would be a decent choice also. 

    Now if the gold is 2 grams and under with a variety of density shapes and or specimens, go GPX-6000 or Axiom and don't worry. 

    I actually feel most of my detector selection between the two you mentioned, should also be the unit you feel most comfortable with. Confidence in one's detector and skill level is most important. 

    Many informative pieces of advice from great hunters. 

    Good luck and keep us posted of your choice and success. 

    • Like 5
  7. That's quite a large haul of treasures/trash which indicates it does not get detected very often.

    Love the interesting ring and it seems you now have it ID'd.

    A full bottle of jagermeister, now that's a treat.  

    Interesting pic of the river.  Have you been able to recover any Civil War era items?  NC had it's share of activity in certain areas.  Looks to be higher elevation with the clear water quality. 

    Well done and thanks for helping clean the environment at the same time.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  8. 15 hours ago, Skull diver said:

    Hard for me to forget 12.01 to 12.25 lottery numbers....

    Still a sniper rifle today with the right conditions.

    Too bad it feels less deep in detection than a D2 even with 9" coil...

    I keep it as a relic and it will remain the instrument I have had the most confidence with.

    Yes, the golden #'s on the CTX.  My wife has a gorgeous triple diamond ring set in platinum that was handed down to her mother and when mom passed, handed down to my wife.  When the 3030 1st came out, I tested about 30 gold rings and was stunned to see 12.01.  Another interesting piece many folks don't know about.  A beautiful gold ring that's band has broken.  Good luck hearing those to most of you.

    I imagine, as I start to get a dozen Caribbean trips under my belt with the Manti, and trying different Settings, I'm hoping to be more pleased with the depth when compared to my old reliable. 

    Please anyone reading this, don't think the Manticore is not a good saltwater detector because that is absolutely false.  I'm saying this with confidence, it's my #1 go to saltwater detector overall.

    - Easier to pack and I actually carry the complete detector on the plane with me. Can't do so with a CTX

    - Swings in the water with least friction and after a few days, I can still hunt. CTX is like swinging a paddle.

    - Much better waterproofing on Manti.  I had 3030's leaking the 1st trip we did.  Minelab said "you're doing something wrong".  Wonder why they finally changed the back seals and different O-ring?

    - Better on small jewelry such as gold ankle/wrist bracelets, necklaces, earrings, belly studs.

    - Faster Processor for when detecting around piers and areas in the water with higher iron trash.

    - Price point is better and peace of mind when traveling with two Manti's vs two 3030's.

    Side Note for land - Way better on gold nuggets than a CTX...I mean way better.

    Yes, like you, I too will keep that long range sniper rifle for those few occasions.

    • Like 2
  9. Man, That's quite a bit of work but as you said...you wanted to learn.

    I know of a couple customers who send their jewelry in as well. I don't think they go to the efforts and detail (in fact I'm quite certain) as you did.  

    I still have not decided if I]m best to sell them individually to get top dollar or not waist as much time and work with a smelter in small volume amounts.

    Thanks for sharing.

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...