Jump to content

Againstmywill

Full Member
  • Posts

    446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Posts posted by Againstmywill

  1. 3 hours ago, Mike Hillis said:

    I like it.    

    Is the cross hollow or solid?     If its hollow that would make a good test piece as gold crosses are normally hard to find due to their angularity and low conductivity.  

    HH
    Mike

    The cross is kind of like a tray that is holding some sort of metal that the gems are inset into. It's almost like solder was poured around the gems and it is holding them in. I have not seen something like it before. 

  2. 2 hours ago, GB_Amateur said:

    AMW, if you go dectecting, anything you find counts in my book.  I (and I'm sure everyone) has found 'sunbakers' where just my eyes were involved, regardless digging/not.  Sounds like your Eqx + 15" inch coil called your attention to it.  Nice chain and cross!

    P.S.  I assume you gave your Carrot a bath.  The only time mine looks like that is after a good cleaning, and it doesn't stay that way for long.

    Thanks 🙂 Here in FL the ground is so sandy that there is not much to stick to the carrot. It has also been very dry recently, so even the sand doesn't stick to it.

  3. 2 hours ago, Rick N. MI said:

    Nice find. Good you could get out. It's snowing right now in northern Michigan.

    Well, here in FL we are well into the "hot" season. Temp was 90 yesterday and today's dew point is 72. I feel for those in colder climates and can remember those days well in Utah when I knew there was a quarter under the ground, but the ground was frozen. I don't miss the cracking hands and the numb fingers and toes. 

  4. One good thing about social distancing was not having relatives for Easter dinner at our place this year so that we didn't have to clean the house! That afforded a couple hours of detecting time. Sadly, the football field and baseball fields I normally frequent were all chained off. So, I had to get creative. I detected around the outside of one of the diamonds and ran the 15" Equinox coil over this recent drop. I would not have seen it just walking past it, so I still count it as a find even though no dirt was dug. The chain is .925 and the cross says 10K. There are a couple names on the part that the chain goes through. My diamond tester did not show positive for diamonds. A blessed Easter to you all!

    IMG_20200412_111804.jpg

    IMG_20200412_111954.jpg

    IMG_20200412_112058.jpg

    IMG_20200412_112118.jpg

    IMG_20200412_112730.jpg

  5. 1 hour ago, dogodog said:

    Your going to need some more fingers, I'm sure my wife would donate a couple Ha Ha. Good job !!!  I believe the hexagon tack looking thing in the background is a plaster fastener. They were used to hold the wire to the plaster board in commercial construction. Around 1950's/1960's. I've found 2 in the last couple days

    I would not have guessed that. I thought it might have been off of a key holder. Thanks for mentioning it.

  6. 1 hour ago, dogodog said:

    So today I decided to take some advise that Againstmywill posted recently, and I cut my gain way back and decided to hunt the top couple of inches of ground. Boy did it pay off

    Took my advice...said by no one else, ever! 😁

    Glad you scored a ring! Was your digging faster so you could recover more targets?

  7. 18 hours ago, Againstmywill said:

    I guess I tend to cover more ground with the 15" coil so there is more chance of swinging over a ring. Try covering more ground by reducing the depth you are going. Turn the sensitivity down so you are hitting only the top 3-4 inches and then go to a ball field and swing, swing, swing.

    If I go deeper, I may find some rings. The problem with pulling up really deep rings is that by the time you investigate the target and dig down deep, someone who is searching for more recent drops (those in the last year or two) will have been able to recover 5 targets. If I find a gold ring for every 1,000 digs, that would likely hold true if I dug deeper. However, the time it took to do so would be 5 times longer. To me, it's all about covering the most ground on the fields. If I were searching for silver coins or relics, I would completely change my style to match. 

  8. 10 minutes ago, phrunt said:

    I don't know how you do it, I spend hundreds of hours digging thousands of coins and rarely ever find a ring 🙂  I'd be happy to find a  costume jewellery ring just so I know rings get lost around here!

     

    Nothing special that I do that you don't. I guess it's just like real estate... location, location, location. Funny, I would love to pick a field clean of silver coins.

    Because you detected gold before, you have not been detecting coins for very long I believe. You have mastered that very quickly. When I started detecting years ago with a Whites MXT, I never found rings. I mistakenly only listened for the coins. Another detectorist told me that he found many rings with the MXT. When I switched to an AT Pro, I was able to gel with that machine and found my first gold ring. Then, my G2 was next with some rings. The e-trac turned up a few after that. The Equinox just seems to have a special ability to cover the ground while just nailing the rings. I guess I tend to cover more ground with the 15" coil so there is more chance of swinging over a ring. Try covering more ground by reducing the depth you are going. Turn the sensitivity down so you are hitting only the top 3-4 inches and then go to a ball field and swing, swing, swing.

  9. So, went back out with the Equinox today to the park that had a lot of change. I hit a spot this time that was busier the last time I was at the park. There were many pieces of flat metal littered all over the place which gave very nice sounding 23's on the display. Almost $4 in change in 1 1/2 hours today. There was also a screaming 11/12 that was so sweet. Imagine my smile when I flipped the plug up and saw the yellow edge gleaming in the sun. As in most things, don't count your chickens before they're hatched. The ring is a golden specimen of electroplated stainless steel. 🙁 Almost at the vehicle I had a 27/28 on the display. I dug down about an inch in the grass and came up with a 1964 dime. Still more grass to cover and jewelry to find!

    IMG_20200402_172058.jpg

    IMG_20200402_172300.jpg

    IMG_20200402_191410.jpg

    IMG_20200402_191426.jpg

    IMG_20200402_191431.jpg

  10. Went to a new park today to dirt fish while my son went fish fishing. He was happy catching 3 fish in 3 hours, and I was happy finding a park that has not been hit too hard. I can't remember the last time I found over $12 in change in 3 hours of detecting, except for after when a carnival packed up and left. There were 36 quarters, 23 dimes, 11 nickels, and about 25 pennies. The 15" coil on the Equinox is no slouch at finding coins. Next time I will have to slow down and dig lots of trash to start pulling the gold rings out. If there are that many coins, it stands to reason there will be rings. Park 1, 7 recovery speed, 0 iron bias, 18 sensitivity, ground balanced, and all metal.

    IMG_20200331_203015.jpg

  11. 2 minutes ago, 2Valen said:

    I did the test on my ring and it showed up as a 24, my wedding ring that I wear showed a 12.

    My wedding ring is  a  10K 2 tone gold ring with some small diamonds.

    My old ring that looks close to yours shows 10 k also, I think that the reason it rings up differently is because it has the hollow area in the top. It does have the 10K mark on the inside towards the top.

    Hope this helps.

    Thanks for taking the time to look for the ring and then test it on the detector. Very kind of you.

  12. Just now, kac said:

    Other metal to check is palladium which looks like platinum. The acid test kits check for that too. I never found any so can't tell you what they ring in at.

    I'm guessing it wasn't in the ground too long--only 1" deep. In that time, it had some tarnish on it. I soaked in ketchup, but that did nothing. Once I put it in jewelry cleaner, the tarnish came off quickly. Some buffing brought back the shine. 

  13. 55 minutes ago, 2Valen said:

    I was wondering the same thing as I had a ring like that made from 2 tone gold, and yes when I dropped it I could hear a higher than normal tone from it. I think it was because of the way it was made, almost hollow in the top.

    Do you still have it to test the ID?

  14. Was out today using the 15" on a local softball field. Park 1, 18 sensitivity, all metal, 7 recovery speed, 0 iron bias, ground balanced.

    Granted, I could have found this with my first detector, an Ace 100, but the 15" on the Equinox sure covers the ground. This ring was at most 1" deep. I knew it was either a few quarters or a silver ring. I was just thinking today as I was detecting before finding this that my silver ring count was low; I have found more gold than silver. Ironic. And no, I am not complaining.😉

    IMG_20200325_112032.jpg

    IMG_20200325_112042.jpg

    IMG_20200325_115622.jpg

    IMG_20200325_205112.jpg

    IMG_20200325_205215.jpg

    IMG_20200325_205129.jpg

    Screenshot_20200326-131212.jpg

  15. So, last night was not four in a row night for gold. You can't win them all. 

    Nevertheless,  I detected a different spot on the football field. I have found the blue-tipped bullets before, but they were really the hot ticket last night. They came in a tight 16-17, so they are a must-dig.  Same settings as my other posts. 

    The 15" coil is able to get the small stuff as shown in one of the picks. There is part of a "Diamond" stud earring that sang to me as a solid 8-9. Crazy that it was able to pick that up as I'm swinging away at a recovery speed 7 to cover  a lot of ground before the lights go off on the field. Not much for change, only a little over $3. Lots of nickels, however.

    IMG_20200317_222827.jpg

    IMG_20200317_222822.jpg

    IMG_20200317_222817.jpg

  16. Just now, kac said:

    Most junk like aluminum can slag, pull rings etc generate unstable vdi's. Gold rings always seem to have a nicer smoother roll to them, more subtle than trash and nickels too on the machines I have used. That similar on the Nox?

    For me, it seems like the rings produce a "hard, repeatable hit" vs. a "wimpy, choppy hit." The variability is key for my ears. Little to no variability means to dig, and not just these lower numbers.

  17. 6 hours ago, 2Valen said:

    Nice find, but what type of quarterback would be wearing that?

    What was the depth that it was at when you dug it up. I have had some shallow targets that rand up the same that I had passed on in the past. I really should be digging up those numbers, but am still new with the 800.

    Thanks.

    2 inches or so. There is a lot of other aluminum junk that falls into those numbers (9, 10, 11), but the way the ID locks onto a ring is a tipoff once you have dug enough of those numbers. In fact, if the ID numbers stay within a range of 2 numbers as you swing, make sure to dig it. If it bounces through 3 or more numbers, it will likely be junk. A 9 is not common, a 10 is often the flat piece of aluminum that gets pushed down when a can is opened, and an 11 is not common. All those numbers can be aluminum shards of some sort. Start digging those numbers if you want the smaller women's rings...the ones with diamonds.

×
×
  • Create New...