Equinox 600 And Bluetooth

[justinberry]

4 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

 If it pairs up at all, then it's not your detector, the lack of a plus sign definitively means the D9 is not flashed with APTX LL, as I feared (just plain Vanilla APTX or some other non LL APTX variant, like APTX HD).  That's why I specifically asked the + sign question of drive-by poster FoundingFather1776, who never re-visited the site after posting.  See if MPOW has a firmware update to get the D9 to APTX LL.  If not, you are out of luck and you should return them unless you want to use them for other purposes than detecting.  I too have run into ambiguously worded specs by MPOW and received a non APTX LL set of headphones purported to be low latency.

 

 

Went and tried it yesterday with just Bluetooth and it was horrible, lagging and fantom humming signals. The manufacturer is on China time so communication is gonna be drawn out and strenuous but on the plus side, in my experience, they always refund without having to return. Oh well, back to researching ear buds/phone's. Thanks for the info. I bet foundingfather is the U.S. shipper of the MPOW why I got it so fast.

[Noah (FL)]

I’ve been using my Sennheiser CX6.00 for a year or more now and they are great.  Battery is good for around 5+hours and they are the low latency version(+ sign).  Not sure on their waterproof rating but I’ve got them as sweaty as ever and haven’t had any moisture problems. I believe they are close to $100 retail but can usually be found for less at the usual online sales spots(amazon, ebay, etc...)

[justinberry]

On 3/8/2020 at 11:46 PM, justinberry said:

I ordered the MPOW D9 and cannot get them to (+). Trying for two days now. Got ahold of MPOW, waiting for reply. Not exactly sure it isn't my 600 that's being difficult. Would test but all my other BT speakers and phone are not APTX.

Well, no luck that route ?

[Noah (FL)]

2 hours ago, justinberry said:

Well, no luck that route ?

That’s pretty crappy. Seems that they could easily tell you if a different firmware was available that supports the LL.  Unfortunately many of these “name brand” headphones these days are manufactured by a separate company and they just add their name/branding to the product.  That’s probably what is going on with these.  

[justinberry]

1 hour ago, Noah (FL) said:

That’s pretty crappy. Seems that they could easily tell you if a different firmware was available that supports the LL.  Unfortunately many of these “name brand” headphones these days are manufactured by a separate company and they just add their name/branding to the product.  That’s probably what is going on with these.  

Funny thing is before I even got them they are the ones I talked to about them being late. NOW it's not their problem lol.

[justinberry]

19 hours ago, justinberry said:

Funny thing is before I even got them they are the ones I talked to about them being late. NOW it's not their problem lol.

Settled out of eBay court for $4 lol

[Winnieme05]

I'm confused. In order to use wireless/bluetooth headphones with the Nox 600, do I need to purchase the WM08 wireless module?

 

[GB_Amateur]

27 minutes ago, Winnieme05 said:

I'm confused. In order to use wireless/bluetooth headphones with the Nox 600, do I need to purchase the WM08 wireless module?

 

No.  Bluetooth and proprietary wireless are two different, unrelated channels.