Jump to content

Jim in Idaho

Full Member
  • Posts

    783
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Everything posted by Jim in Idaho

  1. Here's a link to the buck converter I use as a charger:DROK buck converter Here's a link to the battery management controller:Tenergy battery management controller Battery Junction also has the batteries
  2. I don't know of any videos that are specific to the SL. There are quite a few videos on making up the packs. It's just a matter of getting it all to fit into the Whites pack. You have to basically gut the Whites pack. Tale out all the plastic that holds the 8 AA batteries in place, along with all the wiring, excepting the contacts at the end. The batteries will fit in pairs along the sides, leaving room in the middle for a Tenergy controller, which is long and narrow. The Li-ion cells you want are the Panasonic, or other quality brand of 18650 3400 mah, or as much as you can find. The cells can be glued in with hotmelt glue. The cells are tool thick to use the stock cover. You have to ditch it,. and use a piece of thin vinyl or plastic as a cover. The just wire it up as the instructions with the controller say. Not really complicated, but having soldering experience is a big help, and some electronics understanding. For a charger I use a buck converter that will run off anything from 8-64 volts, and has controllable output of both voltage and current. You can find them on Ebay. I generally only charge mine to 16v., and I don't charge at a higher rate than 1 amp. I often use a wall wart as the power supply for the buck converter, but using that, I can only charge at a .5amp rate. Jim
  3. To my knowledge RNB does not make a 4-cell li-ion pack for the TDI SL. They DO make a 3-cell. The only builder of 4-cell packs is Reidman, and I haven't found his sales online lately. I did hear he was booked-up temporarily, however. He would NOT ship overseas, however, in any case. The best way to get a 4-cell pack is to make one, or find somebody local to make one for you. I just built one for my own use. Cost about $50.
  4. I have not. They look interesting. But, you won't get a voltage boosth from them...only 8 will fit in the TDI SL. But they might be the nuts in my GM24K. Nobody makes a lithium rechargeable pack for that. Jim
  5. This mod is just to accept a wider range of sweep speeds. Jim
  6. Nope. What you want to accomplish with the SS mod is a less critical SS on tiny items, without losing any sensitivity to the those items. I'm not sure it would make any difference on most beach targets.
  7. Did you do the sweep speed mod on your SL, Mark? Jim
  8. Hey Jon, How goes the battle? hope you're finding some gold up there on the NSR! Jim
  9. Hi HTH, and welcome! Looking forward to your finds reports. Jim
  10. yes...they break our hearts in the end, but all we can do is give them the best life possible, and then say "goodbye". then go get another. I'm on my 14th now. God, I pray they'll be waiting for me when I pass. Jim
  11. Yeah...I have to be careful where I take Heidi, too. Last fall i wanted to prospect a particular canyon and ran into signs warning of potentially lethal traps in the area. They were trapping wolves, and the rancher told me the traps were non-lethal, but even a leghold for a wolf would probably break Heidi's leg, so I went elsewhere. I also try to never take her into snake country when the snakes are active. She's had the rattlesnake shots every year, but I'd rather not risk it. Limits where i can go, but not a big deal. I can't imagine a piece of gold big enough I'd risk Heidi to have it. Jim
  12. Permit? I don't need no steenking permit....LOL Jim......in Blackfoot.
  13. Mark G. reminded me I hadn't posted the video link, to the comparison video, on here. So, here it is: sweep speed comparison
  14. Many thanks, Mark. You did a nice job on it, and will be rewarded with many years of use, not to mention the increased depth1 Jim
  15. Well, it's hard to gauge people's skill, Jim. You need a decent soldering iron with a small wedge tip, for starters. You also need some solder wick to absorb as much of the old solder as you can. It's also nice to have a really tiny drill bit, which I didn't have....the smallest I had was the one in my "number drill" kit, and it seemed it was too big, but might have been OK. (#60 .040") I ended up using a hardened steel wire, from a welding brush, heated with the soldering iron, to remove the last bit of old solder from the holes. Installing the new caps is easy, once the holes are cleaned out. The rest is just disassembly, and reassembly. A magnifying glass is a help, to check your resolder job on the new caps. The new caps need to be matched to 1%, too. The overall capacitance isn't critical, but whatever it is, they should be close to the same. I didn't see any difference in depth, but now wonder how much gold I've missed from sweeping too fast. Jim
  16. Bit the bullet and did the sweep speed mod this morning. Made a huge difference in the acceptable SS. I ran the 1 grain gold bar past the 8 x 6 Sadie coil before doing the mod, and there was a relatively slow, specific sweep speed that gave the best signal. Too fast, and the signal completely disappeared. After the mod, the SS made almost no difference. Fast, slow, the signal was steady. No change in indicated depth in the air test. Threshold was still smooth. I'll post a video of the before/after tests later on. I changed the filter caps (C20, 21) from .47ufd, to ,22ufd. A friend in Florida, who is a civilian tech working for the Navy, was kind enough to send me a few matched pairs of the caps. Without his encouragement, and help, I probably never would have tackled this. Now I'm really glad I did. One tool I'm glad I had was my fly-tying magnifying light. My eyes don't focus like they did when I was young, and that magnification allowed me to see the soldered spots, to be sure I had done a thorough job. Jim
  17. I did a quick test, with a quarter, on the 12"DF and it was about 11 1/2", Mark. The battery pack was purchased 3 years ago from a guy that goes by "Reidman" on Ebay. Last time I checked, he was no longer offering them, however. Now that I have one, I could build another pretty easily. I use a charger that the output voltage can be set to any desired voltage, so I can limit the final charge voltage to 16v. Standard chargers can't be adjusted, and don't stop until reaching 16.8v. The SL handles that OK, but you get more charge-discharge cycles from a pack by limiting the charge to 80%, or in the case of a 4-cell pack, 16.0v. Doing that will almost double the life of the pack. I think my SL is especially "hot". Just got lucky. It detects that 1 grain gold bar farther than my GM24K, or GMT. I think the reason the 12"DF is more sensitive than even the Sadie coil is the increased voltage. I'd bet, if I dropped the voltage to 12v, the 12"DF would not match the Sadie 8 x 6. I doubt the Sadie would decrease....the small coils don't benefit much from the added voltage. The SL is a good machine with the added voltage. Whites should upgrade the standard battery, IMHO. Or maybe re-design some components, and go all the way up to 21v. I was not impressed with the SP 350. I'd like to find a good 7 x12 mono for mine. LOL....that didn't cost an arm and leg. Jim
  18. I finally had time to do some testing on the SL, regarding the Ground balance. Here's the result: TDI SL GB TEST 350 Super Pulse coil. battery voltage at start of test = 16.0v Freq. max., Switch in "ALL", Gain MAX, Pulse delay MIN. 1979 US nickel Sweeping side-to-side. The test setup was having the detector vertical, with the coil on top of a 5 gallon bucket to minimize the ground effects. I taped a yardstick to the shaft. I did NOT use headphones, but did repeatedly sweep the nickel to try and get honest results. GB off 13" GB on: 2 14 1/2" 3 15 1/2" 4 15 1/2" 5 15 1/2" 6 14 1/2" 7 to 11 15 1/2" Freq. set to minimum GB off same GB on: 2 14 3/4" 3 14 1/2 4 14 1/2" 5 14 1/2" 6 thru 11 15" Switch to 12"DF coil GB off 17" GB on: 2-5 17" 6-11 16" 12DF with 1 grain gold bar GB off 3 1/4" GB on: 2-11 3 3/4" Both coils with 6 gram men's gold ring: Both coils detected this very close to the same as they did with the nickel. But, turning the GB on and off had very little effect on the depth. It's apparent to me that on some items, my detector is definitely better with the GB on, but set to 2, or minimum. But on larger gold, the GB has little effect. But what effect there is favors having the GB on, but set to minimum. There was only one instance where having the GB off was an improvement. I also tested my NF Sadie 8 x 6, and was surprised to see it was LESS sensitive to the 1 grain gold bar, than the 12"DF. The Sadie struggled to make 3". For me the best coil is the 12"DF, where it can be used. Where it's too cumbersome, I'll go to the Sadie. The Sadie was better than the 7 1/2"DF, and the MJ 5 x 9. I sorta wish I hadn't sold the 7 1/2"DF...I'd like to test it more. I also tested a 1" thick x 4" diameter hunk of aluminum, with a 1 1/4" hole through the center. Neither coil could detect it near as well as they did the nickel. Jim
  19. Yup...that explains a lot, Mark...many thanks! If I can find the time, I'm going to have to rerun some tests to specifically target the GB settings, and see what's going on. JIm
  20. That's an interesting question, but I have no idea if that's the case with the Whites TDI SL. Jim
  21. It would be a help if the testers posted the year their SL's were built, along with the battery voltage at the time of the test. Jim
  22. I picked up one good thing about this discussion, besides the overall stuff. That is, there's a benefit to running the frequency maxed out, as far as energy to the coil goes. I'll be doing that from now on, assuming it doesn't cause an excess noise problem. On mine, that's over an 8% gain in coil voltage. Nothing to sneer at. Jim
  23. Sorry, John. I thought you'd said '14. So, it's possible the '13's are different somehow.
  24. Sure looks that way, Mark. John (auminesweeper), and I both have machines built fairly early, and we get very similar results. His was built in '14, and mine in '13. So it looks like yours is different, for sure. What did you have a for a batterry voltage in that test? Jim
×
×
  • Create New...