Masked Non-ferrous Vs Iron Falsing

[HardPack]

The video examines the methods employed by both the XP Deus II and ML Manticore with a comparison of the discrimination setting tonal break points, TID averaging, ground conditions, etc related to non-ferrous target iron masking. A technique for differentiating masked non-ferrous signals from the ferrous (iron) falsing signals is explained. Watch to the end for the “Impedance Plane Analysis” (X - Y axis, phase angle, target vector) for explanation of what non-ferrous target signals are modified by an adjacent ferrous target. 
 

 

[JCR]

That is a good visual explanation of some of the important basics hiding in the weeds. Not only for iron masking & ground masking/balance, but Hot Rock adjustment for those detectors that have that capability.  Thanks for posting it.

[Geotech]

His vector analyses are very much on the right track but some of his specifics are off. But a pretty decent job overall.

[Jeff McClendon]

I always enjoy watching and learning a little from Loren's videos. Wow, I thought my detectors and tools were dirty!!!!

[CPT_GhostLight]

I've watched that video a few times before and now each time I watch it, I understand a little more. 😏

[HardPack]

I agree, lots of good information.