Jump to content
Website Rollback - Latest Updates ×

Minelab Vanquish 440/540 Internal Photos, Etc.


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, phrunt said:

Rendered in real time..... you missed the vital part of it. A 16mhz 8bit processor can do it, not a 200+mhz 32bit Anyway, I'm not going to argue... really last time I'm speaking in this thread.

Look, you completely missed what i was saying before.

I worked a bit with ultrasound like signals, and all that signal processing stuff is quite similar to what is used in cases like Xterra and Equinox. Same dds-demod-multirate filter etc. So in our case one channel (I or Q) with DDS, demodulator and post demod mutltirate filter was consuming around 50 operations per sample with 32 bit integers. Actually some accumulators were wider than 32 bits, but not that important. Assuming that equinox processing is similar, works with four frequencies, has sampling frequency of 100kHz for simplicity, we are getting 80 millions of these calculations per second. It is already a significant portion of what M7 core can do at 200MHz.

You keeps assuming that all it does is scans buttons and lights up segments on display, which is completely wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

You got that right! :laugh:

Whilst processing power was being disputed.......my detecting pal found another 18k whooper with a fat emerald yesterday with his Tesoro Compadre!!!!!??? Hasn’t had it valued yet but it’s a tad over 16grams.   Not sure what that converts to in mHz????

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh these Padawans........old Geezer talk to follow.........Why I remember a project we were doing for the U.S. Department of Transportation for Railway Safety Signaling.....and.....well we had Intel 8080‘s with 2K of Ram.  One day it was announced we were going to get 4K of Ram.  We broke out the bubbly.....oh the feats we would be able to accomplish with 4K!!!!!  We threw a heck of a party.....but not much coding got done the following day. :laugh::laugh::laugh:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Apollo Lunar Module only had 2K of core memory.  I'm pretty sure my iPhone could've ran everything and then some that a 1960's NASA Mission Control center that was using IBM mainframes ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

During WW2, the total combined computing capacity of the Allies was less than what you buy in a birthday card at the store that sings happy birthday. And everyone readily accepts that such a card is disposable, at least on a hardware level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...